{"title":"Global advances in fish passage research and practice","authors":"L. Baumgartner, Luiz G. M. Silva","doi":"10.1080/24705357.2019.1670745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The water-food-energy nexus is central to sustainable development (Poff and Olden 2017). Demand for all three is increasing, driven by a rising global population, rapid urbanization, changing diets and economic growth. In response, many countries are implementing unprecedented irrigation and hydropower expansion programs infrastructure to secure food, water and energy resources. Globally, irrigation has doubled in the last 50 years (Foley et al. 2011) and hydropower is expected to double again by 2050 (Ziv et al. 2012). Therefore, it is important that such development is planned, implemented and managed appropriately (Lynch et al. 2019) because any structure which diverts or stores water will impede the free movement of fish; in both an upstream and downstream direction. The environmental impacts of migration barriers have been recognised globally as one of the major threats for aquatic biota, particularly riverine species (Poff and Hart 2002). But there is always a significant challenge developing technical solutions that minimise impacts on fish, and create mutually beneficial outcomes for the environment and society. Fish passage has long been an intervention applied by irrigation and fisheries managers to mitigate the impacts of riverine development on fish (Clay 1995). But getting fish passage implemented correctly represents a significant engineering and biological challenge (Silva et al. 2018). Often, there are multiple solutions that may fit any given site but the best for implementation depends on a range of factors including target species and size classes, the expected ecological outcomes, local site hydrology, constructability and available budget (Larinier and Marmulla 2004). At many sites, data availability is often limited and so engineers and biologists must work collaboratively to implement functional solutions. This often requires design compromises which can only be agreed upon in collaboration (MallenCooper and Brand 2007). As has been famously noted, “An engineer may learn a lot of biology, and a biologist may learn a lot of engineering but, ultimately, both skills are needed to implement a functional solution” (Clay 1995). This special issue of Journal of Ecohydraulics explores recent biological and engineering advances in fish passage technology to help mitigate the impacts of barriers on fish migrations. The articles highlight the impacts of river infrastructure on fish and key knowledge advances for biologists and engineers to apply at future sites. Whilst these contrasting perspectives are explored from different angles, they essentially seek to arrive at the same outcome; winwin benefits for both fish and river development. Key topics include:","PeriodicalId":93201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ecohydraulics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ecohydraulics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24705357.2019.1670745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The water-food-energy nexus is central to sustainable development (Poff and Olden 2017). Demand for all three is increasing, driven by a rising global population, rapid urbanization, changing diets and economic growth. In response, many countries are implementing unprecedented irrigation and hydropower expansion programs infrastructure to secure food, water and energy resources. Globally, irrigation has doubled in the last 50 years (Foley et al. 2011) and hydropower is expected to double again by 2050 (Ziv et al. 2012). Therefore, it is important that such development is planned, implemented and managed appropriately (Lynch et al. 2019) because any structure which diverts or stores water will impede the free movement of fish; in both an upstream and downstream direction. The environmental impacts of migration barriers have been recognised globally as one of the major threats for aquatic biota, particularly riverine species (Poff and Hart 2002). But there is always a significant challenge developing technical solutions that minimise impacts on fish, and create mutually beneficial outcomes for the environment and society. Fish passage has long been an intervention applied by irrigation and fisheries managers to mitigate the impacts of riverine development on fish (Clay 1995). But getting fish passage implemented correctly represents a significant engineering and biological challenge (Silva et al. 2018). Often, there are multiple solutions that may fit any given site but the best for implementation depends on a range of factors including target species and size classes, the expected ecological outcomes, local site hydrology, constructability and available budget (Larinier and Marmulla 2004). At many sites, data availability is often limited and so engineers and biologists must work collaboratively to implement functional solutions. This often requires design compromises which can only be agreed upon in collaboration (MallenCooper and Brand 2007). As has been famously noted, “An engineer may learn a lot of biology, and a biologist may learn a lot of engineering but, ultimately, both skills are needed to implement a functional solution” (Clay 1995). This special issue of Journal of Ecohydraulics explores recent biological and engineering advances in fish passage technology to help mitigate the impacts of barriers on fish migrations. The articles highlight the impacts of river infrastructure on fish and key knowledge advances for biologists and engineers to apply at future sites. Whilst these contrasting perspectives are explored from different angles, they essentially seek to arrive at the same outcome; winwin benefits for both fish and river development. Key topics include:
水-粮食-能源关系是可持续发展的核心(Poff和Olden, 2017)。在全球人口增长、快速城市化、饮食变化和经济增长的推动下,对这三种食品的需求都在增加。为此,许多国家正在实施前所未有的灌溉和水电扩建计划,以确保粮食、水和能源的安全。在全球范围内,灌溉在过去50年中翻了一番(Foley et al. 2011),预计到2050年水电将再次翻一番(Ziv et al. 2012)。因此,适当规划、实施和管理这种开发是很重要的(Lynch等人,2019),因为任何转移或储存水的结构都会阻碍鱼类的自由流动;在上游和下游都有。在全球范围内,迁徙障碍的环境影响已被认为是水生生物群,特别是河流物种的主要威胁之一(Poff和Hart 2002)。但是,开发技术解决方案,最大限度地减少对鱼类的影响,并为环境和社会创造互利的结果,始终是一个重大挑战。长期以来,鱼类通道一直是灌溉和渔业管理人员用来减轻河流开发对鱼类影响的一种干预措施(Clay 1995)。但正确实现鱼类通道是一项重大的工程和生物学挑战(Silva et al. 2018)。通常,有多种解决方案可能适合任何给定的地点,但最佳实施取决于一系列因素,包括目标物种和大小类别、预期的生态结果、当地的水文、可建造性和可用预算(Larinier和Marmulla 2004)。在许多站点,数据可用性通常是有限的,因此工程师和生物学家必须协同工作来实现功能解决方案。这通常需要在设计上做出妥协,而这只能在合作中达成一致(MallenCooper and Brand 2007)。众所周知,“工程师可能会学到很多生物学知识,而生物学家可能会学到很多工程学知识,但最终,实现功能性解决方案需要这两种技能”(Clay 1995)。本期《生态水力学杂志》特刊探讨了鱼类通道技术的最新生物学和工程学进展,以帮助减轻障碍对鱼类洄游的影响。文章强调了河流基础设施对鱼类的影响,以及生物学家和工程师在未来应用的关键知识进展。虽然这些截然不同的观点是从不同的角度探索的,但它们本质上寻求达到相同的结果;鱼类和河流发展双赢。主要议题包括: