Retrospective evaluation and comparison of oxygen supply management with piped supply with cylinder manifold in first wave of COVID-19 against piped supply with liquid medical oxygen system in second wave of COVID-19

Sandipbhai Patel, V. Gaikwad, B. Suroshe, Harshal M. Mahajan
{"title":"Retrospective evaluation and comparison of oxygen supply management with piped supply with cylinder manifold in first wave of COVID-19 against piped supply with liquid medical oxygen system in second wave of COVID-19","authors":"Sandipbhai Patel, V. Gaikwad, B. Suroshe, Harshal M. Mahajan","doi":"10.5455/njppp.2023.13.12592202225122022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: COVID-19 infection is a major health pandemic all over world started in 2019. Due to respiratory tract involvement, major number of patients required oxygen supplementation. Dedicated COVID hospitals and others required high burden of oxygen all over world. During first wave, oxygen supply management to main hospital building of our institute was by the central piped supply with cylinder manifold whereas during second wave, it was piped supply with 20 KL liquid medical oxygen (LMO) SYSTEM. Aims and Objectives: With this background, we decided to compare these both systems by questionnaire-based interview of healthcare worker and data evaluation. We planned to conduct this study with aim to compare effectiveness and ease of oxygen supply management with both these oxygen supply systems. Materials and Methods: We took questionnaire-based interviews of oxygen store people, intensive care unit, and ward in charge sisters and doctors and manpower working at oxygen supply systems. Results: Both systems of oxygen supply provided uninterrupted supply of oxygen during COVID outbreak with statistically significant less stress level of healthcare workers, good pressure constancy, less cost, and more ease of operability of LMO system. Conclusion: During daily high demand of oxygen, LMO system is superior than piped supply with cylinder manifold system.","PeriodicalId":18969,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/njppp.2023.13.12592202225122022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 infection is a major health pandemic all over world started in 2019. Due to respiratory tract involvement, major number of patients required oxygen supplementation. Dedicated COVID hospitals and others required high burden of oxygen all over world. During first wave, oxygen supply management to main hospital building of our institute was by the central piped supply with cylinder manifold whereas during second wave, it was piped supply with 20 KL liquid medical oxygen (LMO) SYSTEM. Aims and Objectives: With this background, we decided to compare these both systems by questionnaire-based interview of healthcare worker and data evaluation. We planned to conduct this study with aim to compare effectiveness and ease of oxygen supply management with both these oxygen supply systems. Materials and Methods: We took questionnaire-based interviews of oxygen store people, intensive care unit, and ward in charge sisters and doctors and manpower working at oxygen supply systems. Results: Both systems of oxygen supply provided uninterrupted supply of oxygen during COVID outbreak with statistically significant less stress level of healthcare workers, good pressure constancy, less cost, and more ease of operability of LMO system. Conclusion: During daily high demand of oxygen, LMO system is superior than piped supply with cylinder manifold system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第一波新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)与第二波新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)医用液氧系统管道供氧管理的回顾性评价与比较
背景:2019冠状病毒病感染是2019年开始在全球范围内发生的重大卫生大流行。由于累及呼吸道,大部分患者需要补充氧气。世界各地专门的抗疫医院和其他医院都需要高负荷的氧气。第一波对本院主楼的供氧管理采用带气缸歧管的中央管道供氧,第二波对本院主楼的供氧管理采用20kl医用液体氧(LMO)系统管道供氧。目的和目的:在此背景下,我们决定通过对医护人员的问卷访谈和数据评估来比较这两个系统。我们计划进行这项研究,目的是比较两种供氧系统的供氧管理的有效性和易用性。材料与方法:采用问卷调查的方式对氧库人员、重症监护病房人员、病区主管姐妹、医生及供氧系统工作人员进行访谈。结果:两种供氧系统在疫情期间均能实现不间断供氧,具有统计学意义的低医护人员应激水平、良好的压力稳定性、低成本、易操作性。结论:在日常高需氧量情况下,LMO系统优于管道供氧系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Substance abuse: A survey among medical students of tribal area of Chhattisgarh – A cross-sectional study Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance among 2nd-year medical students: A cross-sectional study Evaluation of ethanolic extract of leaves of Abutilon indicum on carrageenan-induced rat paw edema Students’ reflection on immediate feedback during formative assessment Randomized and controlled trial to determine safety and efficacy of Foley’s catheter and PGE2 gel for induction of labor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1