Bonding performance of universal adhesives with concomitant use of silanes to CAD/CAM blocks

M. Amaral, J. Rizzato, Victoria Caroline Souza de Almeida, Priscila-Christiane-Suzy Liporoni, R. Zanatta
{"title":"Bonding performance of universal adhesives with concomitant use of silanes to CAD/CAM blocks","authors":"M. Amaral, J. Rizzato, Victoria Caroline Souza de Almeida, Priscila-Christiane-Suzy Liporoni, R. Zanatta","doi":"10.1590/1981-86372023002020220004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: This study assessed whether the use of a silane coupling agent influence the bond strength of two universal adhesives to ceramic or resin CAD/CAM blocks. Methods: Forty-eight samples were obtained from each resin nano-ceramic hybrid block (RCBs) and lithium disilicate ceramic blocks (LD). Samples were treated with silane with MDP (Monobond - S-MDP), silane without MDP (Prosil - PS), and no silane application (Control - Ctr) followed by universal adhesive with silane (UAS) and without silane (UA) (n=8). Three polyurethane tubes (1.5 mm of internal diameter) were positioned in each sample treated surface and filled with a dual cured resin cement. Bond strength was assessed by microshear bond strength test and failure analysis was performed for all samples. Results: For the RCBs, UAS presented the highest bond strength values (p=0.004). Silane application was not significant in bond strength values (p=0.444). For LD, silane application was significant in bond strength values (p<0.001), but the adhesive was not (p=0.066). Failure analysis showed high prevalence of adhesive failures for both substrates. Conclusion: A silane-containing universal adhesive promoted the best bond strength results to the resin nano-ceramic hybrid block. For bonding to a glass-ceramic CAD/CAM material, additional silane (without MDP) application presented the best results.","PeriodicalId":30069,"journal":{"name":"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-86372023002020220004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: This study assessed whether the use of a silane coupling agent influence the bond strength of two universal adhesives to ceramic or resin CAD/CAM blocks. Methods: Forty-eight samples were obtained from each resin nano-ceramic hybrid block (RCBs) and lithium disilicate ceramic blocks (LD). Samples were treated with silane with MDP (Monobond - S-MDP), silane without MDP (Prosil - PS), and no silane application (Control - Ctr) followed by universal adhesive with silane (UAS) and without silane (UA) (n=8). Three polyurethane tubes (1.5 mm of internal diameter) were positioned in each sample treated surface and filled with a dual cured resin cement. Bond strength was assessed by microshear bond strength test and failure analysis was performed for all samples. Results: For the RCBs, UAS presented the highest bond strength values (p=0.004). Silane application was not significant in bond strength values (p=0.444). For LD, silane application was significant in bond strength values (p<0.001), but the adhesive was not (p=0.066). Failure analysis showed high prevalence of adhesive failures for both substrates. Conclusion: A silane-containing universal adhesive promoted the best bond strength results to the resin nano-ceramic hybrid block. For bonding to a glass-ceramic CAD/CAM material, additional silane (without MDP) application presented the best results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硅烷通用粘合剂与CAD/CAM块的粘接性能
摘要目的:本研究评估了硅烷偶联剂的使用是否会影响两种通用粘合剂与陶瓷或树脂CAD/CAM块的结合强度。方法:树脂纳米陶瓷杂化块(RCBs)和二硅酸锂陶瓷块(LD)各取48个样品。样品分别用含有MDP的硅烷(Monobond - S-MDP)、不含MDP的硅烷(Prosil - PS)和不含硅烷的硅烷(Control - Ctr)处理,然后用含硅烷(UAS)和不含硅烷(UA)的通用粘合剂处理(n=8)。三个聚氨酯管(1.5 mm内径)被放置在每个样品处理表面,并填充双固化树脂水泥。通过微剪切粘结强度测试评估粘结强度,并对所有样品进行破坏分析。结果:对于rcb, UAS具有最高的粘结强度值(p=0.004)。硅烷应用对粘结强度值无显著影响(p=0.444)。对于LD,硅烷的应用对粘结强度值有显著影响(p<0.001),但粘合剂没有显著影响(p=0.066)。失效分析表明,这两种基材的粘合剂失效率很高。结论:含硅烷万能胶对树脂纳米陶瓷杂化块的粘接效果最好。对于与玻璃陶瓷CAD/CAM材料的结合,添加硅烷(不含MDP)的效果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sleep disorders are associated with both morning temporal and jaw pain among adults and elderly: a population-based study in Brazil Radiolucent image in lower third molar: hidden caries or pre-eruptive resorption?: a case report Edentulism and number of medications are associated with nutritional status in older adults: a population-based cross-sectional study Fluoride in Mozambique: retrospective study Evidence-practice gap in treatment recommendations for proximal caries among Brazilian dentists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1