Cooperative Cytotoxins: A New Look at an Old Observation of Bacterial Crosstalk

R. Linder, Camille D. McIntyre
{"title":"Cooperative Cytotoxins: A New Look at an Old Observation of Bacterial Crosstalk","authors":"R. Linder, Camille D. McIntyre","doi":"10.35248/2155-9597.19.10.362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cooperative (or synergistic) hemolysis, the ability of two bacterial species to jointly lyse erythrocytes, has long been recognized as a helpful tool in the identification of common pathogens (i.e. the CAMP reaction between Streptococcus agalactiae and Staphylococcus aureus). However, to examine these biological partnerships separately from their use in the diagnostic lab provides new perspectives on toxicity to host tissue during infections and in health. Many examples of such pairings exist, and typically reflect the sequential action of a phospholipase (e.g., PLC from Staphylococcus aureus or Clostridium perfringens), followed by a second bacterial toxin acting on the altered membrane, e.g. the CAMP protein of group B streptococci, or the cholesterol oxidase of Rhodococcus equi. Commonly occurring cooperative cytotoxic partnerships are reviewed, along with their biochemical mechanisms of action. Newly reported is the ability of hemolytic collaborations to accommodate a midcourse change in conditions of oxygenation. Thus, erythrocytes altered by PLC of C. perfringens grown anaerobically, are lysed following exposure to the strict aerobe R. equi, in air. Why does this matter? Microbial communities on tissue (i.e. the microbiome) are increasingly understood to impact the health of hosts. Pathogenesis, especially in anaerobic infections, often reflects the combined actions of microbial pathogens, commensal (resident) microorganisms, and metabolites from the host. Products of some cooperative reactions (i.e., ceramide and oxysterol) are directly toxic, e.g., to the immune system. Host environments include a range of oxygenation not intuitively evident, i.e., extreme anaerobiosis in the mouth, creating ideal conditions for cooperative cytotoxicity to occur in vivo. To appreciate the impact of common hydrolytic enzymes and other proteins from diverse sources deepens our understanding of the host and its complex microbial community.","PeriodicalId":15045,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bacteriology & Parasitology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bacteriology & Parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2155-9597.19.10.362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Cooperative (or synergistic) hemolysis, the ability of two bacterial species to jointly lyse erythrocytes, has long been recognized as a helpful tool in the identification of common pathogens (i.e. the CAMP reaction between Streptococcus agalactiae and Staphylococcus aureus). However, to examine these biological partnerships separately from their use in the diagnostic lab provides new perspectives on toxicity to host tissue during infections and in health. Many examples of such pairings exist, and typically reflect the sequential action of a phospholipase (e.g., PLC from Staphylococcus aureus or Clostridium perfringens), followed by a second bacterial toxin acting on the altered membrane, e.g. the CAMP protein of group B streptococci, or the cholesterol oxidase of Rhodococcus equi. Commonly occurring cooperative cytotoxic partnerships are reviewed, along with their biochemical mechanisms of action. Newly reported is the ability of hemolytic collaborations to accommodate a midcourse change in conditions of oxygenation. Thus, erythrocytes altered by PLC of C. perfringens grown anaerobically, are lysed following exposure to the strict aerobe R. equi, in air. Why does this matter? Microbial communities on tissue (i.e. the microbiome) are increasingly understood to impact the health of hosts. Pathogenesis, especially in anaerobic infections, often reflects the combined actions of microbial pathogens, commensal (resident) microorganisms, and metabolites from the host. Products of some cooperative reactions (i.e., ceramide and oxysterol) are directly toxic, e.g., to the immune system. Host environments include a range of oxygenation not intuitively evident, i.e., extreme anaerobiosis in the mouth, creating ideal conditions for cooperative cytotoxicity to occur in vivo. To appreciate the impact of common hydrolytic enzymes and other proteins from diverse sources deepens our understanding of the host and its complex microbial community.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
协同细胞毒素:对细菌相声的旧观察的新认识
协同(或协同)溶血是两种细菌共同溶血红细胞的能力,长期以来一直被认为是鉴定常见病原体的有用工具(如无乳链球菌和金黄色葡萄球菌之间的CAMP反应)。然而,将这些生物伙伴关系与它们在诊断实验室中的使用分开检查,为研究感染期间和健康期间对宿主组织的毒性提供了新的视角。存在许多这样的成对例子,通常反映了磷脂酶的顺序作用(例如,来自金黄色葡萄球菌或产气荚膜梭菌的PLC),其次是作用于改变的膜上的第二种细菌毒素,例如B群链球菌的CAMP蛋白,或马红球菌的胆固醇氧化酶。本文综述了常见的细胞毒性合作伙伴关系及其作用的生化机制。新报道的是溶血协作适应中期氧合条件变化的能力。因此,缺氧生长的产气荚膜梭菌的PLC改变的红细胞,在暴露于空气中的严格需氧细菌r.e equi后被分解。为什么这很重要?组织上的微生物群落(即微生物组)对宿主健康的影响已被越来越多地了解。发病机制,特别是在厌氧感染中,通常反映了微生物病原体、共生(常驻)微生物和宿主代谢物的共同作用。某些协同反应的产物(如神经酰胺和氧甾醇)具有直接毒性,例如对免疫系统。宿主环境包括一系列不直观可见的氧合,即口腔内的极端厌氧,为体内发生协同细胞毒性创造了理想条件。了解来自不同来源的常见水解酶和其他蛋白质的影响可以加深我们对宿主及其复杂微生物群落的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antigenic Structural Similarity as a Predictor for Antibody Cross-Reactivity What is the Probability that a Vaccinated Person is Shielded from COVID-19? Severe Rhinocerebral Mucormycosis Case Developed after COVID-19 Prevalence and Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Parasites in Cattle in Different Zones of Tehsil Chakwal, Punjab, Pakistan Characterization, Associated Risk Factors and Possible Treatment of Healthcare Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HA-MRSA) and Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1