Immunoaffinity column clean-up and thin layer chromatography for determination of ochratoxin A in green coffee

E. A. Santos, E. Vargas
{"title":"Immunoaffinity column clean-up and thin layer chromatography for determination of ochratoxin A in green coffee","authors":"E. A. Santos, E. Vargas","doi":"10.1080/02652030110213717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An immunoaffinity clean-up-based method for determining ochratoxin A (OTA) in green coffee aiming at one-dimensional thin layer chromatography (TLC) analysis was established. OTA was extracted with a mixture of methanol and aqueous sodium hydrogen carbonate solution, purified through an immunoaffinity column, separated on normal or reversed-phase (RP) TLC plates and detected and quantified by visual and densitometric analysis. The linear equation of the standard calibration curve by densitometric analysis gave R2 > 0.999 (0.04–84 ng). The mean recovery (R) of OTA from spiked samples (1.8–109 µg kg−1) by densitometric and visual analyses were 98.4 and 103.8%, respectively. The relative standard deviations (RSD) for densitometric and visual analysis varied from 1.1 to 24.9% and from 0.0 to 18.8%, respectively. The RSD for naturally contaminated samples by densitometry (three levels of contamination, n = 3) varied from 11.1 to 18.1%. The correlation (R2) between high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and densitometry, and between visual and densitometric analysis for spiked samples were > 0.99. The limit of detection (LOD) of the method was 0.5 µg kg−1 for normal TLC. Toluene-ethyl acetate-88% formic acid (6:3:1 v/v/v) and acetonitrile-methanol-water-glacial acetic acid (35:35:29:10 v/v/v/v) were regarded as the suitable TLC solvents for eluting both standards and samples on normal and RP TLC plates, respectively. Toluene-acetic acid (99:1 v/v) was chosen as the spotting solvent among several others for giving the best sensitivity and resolution of OTA on TLC plates as well as the best recovery of OTA from standard and sample extract residues. Preliminary studies were carried out to investigate the reuse of the immunoaffinity column and the interference of caffeine in the OTA recovery.","PeriodicalId":12310,"journal":{"name":"Food Additives & Contaminants","volume":"68 1","pages":"447 - 458"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"64","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Additives & Contaminants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030110213717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

Abstract

An immunoaffinity clean-up-based method for determining ochratoxin A (OTA) in green coffee aiming at one-dimensional thin layer chromatography (TLC) analysis was established. OTA was extracted with a mixture of methanol and aqueous sodium hydrogen carbonate solution, purified through an immunoaffinity column, separated on normal or reversed-phase (RP) TLC plates and detected and quantified by visual and densitometric analysis. The linear equation of the standard calibration curve by densitometric analysis gave R2 > 0.999 (0.04–84 ng). The mean recovery (R) of OTA from spiked samples (1.8–109 µg kg−1) by densitometric and visual analyses were 98.4 and 103.8%, respectively. The relative standard deviations (RSD) for densitometric and visual analysis varied from 1.1 to 24.9% and from 0.0 to 18.8%, respectively. The RSD for naturally contaminated samples by densitometry (three levels of contamination, n = 3) varied from 11.1 to 18.1%. The correlation (R2) between high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and densitometry, and between visual and densitometric analysis for spiked samples were > 0.99. The limit of detection (LOD) of the method was 0.5 µg kg−1 for normal TLC. Toluene-ethyl acetate-88% formic acid (6:3:1 v/v/v) and acetonitrile-methanol-water-glacial acetic acid (35:35:29:10 v/v/v/v) were regarded as the suitable TLC solvents for eluting both standards and samples on normal and RP TLC plates, respectively. Toluene-acetic acid (99:1 v/v) was chosen as the spotting solvent among several others for giving the best sensitivity and resolution of OTA on TLC plates as well as the best recovery of OTA from standard and sample extract residues. Preliminary studies were carried out to investigate the reuse of the immunoaffinity column and the interference of caffeine in the OTA recovery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免疫亲和柱净化及薄层色谱法测定绿咖啡中赭曲霉毒素A
建立了一种基于免疫亲和清除的绿咖啡中赭曲霉毒素A (OTA)的一维薄层色谱检测方法。OTA采用甲醇和碳酸氢钠水溶液混合提取,免疫亲和柱纯化,在正相或反相TLC板上分离,目测和密度分析检测和定量。密度分析的标准校准曲线线性方程R2 > 0.999 (0.04 ~ 84 ng)。通过密度分析和目测分析,加标样品(1.8 ~ 109µg kg - 1)中OTA的平均回收率(R)分别为98.4和103.8%。密度分析和目测分析的相对标准偏差(RSD)分别为1.1 ~ 24.9%和0.0 ~ 18.8%。通过密度测定(三种污染水平,n = 3)自然污染样品的RSD从11.1到18.1%不等。加标样品的高效液相色谱法与密度分析法、目测法与密度分析法的相关系数(R2)均> 0.99。该方法的检出限(LOD)为0.5µg kg−1。分别以甲苯-乙酸乙酯-88%甲酸(6:3:1 v/v/v)和乙腈-甲醇-水-冰醋酸(35:35:29:10 v/v/v/v /v)为标准品和样品在常规和反相薄层色谱板上的合适洗脱溶剂。选择甲苯乙酸(99:1 v/v)作为斑点溶剂,在TLC板上获得了最佳的OTA灵敏度和分辨率,并从标准品和样品提取物残留物中获得了最佳的OTA回收率。初步研究了免疫亲和柱的重复使用和咖啡因对OTA恢复的干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Index of Keywords—Volume 24 List of Referees—Volume 24 Levels of nitrate in Swedish lettuce and spinach over the past 10 years Generation of an antibody specific to erythritol, a non-immunogenic food additive Distribution and elimination of fumonisin analogues in weaned piglets after oral administration of Fusarium verticillioides fungal culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1