Brief Overview of the Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in COVID-19 Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

Antony Macido, Vidya Nair
{"title":"Brief Overview of the Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in COVID-19 Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)","authors":"Antony Macido, Vidya Nair","doi":"10.29173/ijcc48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nA serious complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Hypoxemia refractory to traditional management, including invasive positive pressure ventilation, is not uncommon with COVID-19. It can lead to circulatory failure necessitating the use of mechanical circulatory support devices, specifically extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).\nAim\nThis paper provides a brief update on the use and indications of ECMO for adult patients with COVID-19 around the world.\nMethods\nWe conducted a rapid umbrella review on the use of ECMO in treating COVID-19-related ARDS (CARDS), as well as current indications and contraindications for the initiation of ECMO. We reviewed the use of venovenous (V-V) ECMO and veno-arterial (V-A) ECMO in CARDS.\nFindings\nV-V ECMO is the primary ECMO mode employed in the majority of the patients who required ECMO support for CARDS. Although the duration of V-V ECMO in COVID-19 was longer than the V-V ECMO in non-COVID-19 patients with ARDS, the mortality rate appears similar. Meta-analyses reviewed reported an in-hospital mortality rate ranging from 37% to 49% for COVID-19 patients who required V-V ECMO.\nConclusion\nThe survival benefit of ECMO in COVID-19 patients with severe cardiopulmonary failure is not clearly established, but V-V ECMO may be considered in adults with COVID-19 and severe cardiopulmonary compromise when resources are available. V-A ECMO may be considered in COVID-19 patients with severe cardiac failure, but limited data are available on survival benefits.","PeriodicalId":13937,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/ijcc48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background A serious complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Hypoxemia refractory to traditional management, including invasive positive pressure ventilation, is not uncommon with COVID-19. It can lead to circulatory failure necessitating the use of mechanical circulatory support devices, specifically extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Aim This paper provides a brief update on the use and indications of ECMO for adult patients with COVID-19 around the world. Methods We conducted a rapid umbrella review on the use of ECMO in treating COVID-19-related ARDS (CARDS), as well as current indications and contraindications for the initiation of ECMO. We reviewed the use of venovenous (V-V) ECMO and veno-arterial (V-A) ECMO in CARDS. Findings V-V ECMO is the primary ECMO mode employed in the majority of the patients who required ECMO support for CARDS. Although the duration of V-V ECMO in COVID-19 was longer than the V-V ECMO in non-COVID-19 patients with ARDS, the mortality rate appears similar. Meta-analyses reviewed reported an in-hospital mortality rate ranging from 37% to 49% for COVID-19 patients who required V-V ECMO. Conclusion The survival benefit of ECMO in COVID-19 patients with severe cardiopulmonary failure is not clearly established, but V-V ECMO may be considered in adults with COVID-19 and severe cardiopulmonary compromise when resources are available. V-A ECMO may be considered in COVID-19 patients with severe cardiac failure, but limited data are available on survival benefits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外膜氧合(ECMO)在COVID-19合并严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者中的应用综述
冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)的一个严重并发症是急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)。包括有创正压通气在内的传统治疗难治性低氧血症在COVID-19中并不罕见。它可导致循环衰竭,需要使用机械循环支持装置,特别是体外膜氧合(ECMO)。目的本文简要介绍了世界各地成人COVID-19患者ECMO的使用和适应症。方法对ECMO在治疗covid -19相关ARDS (ARDS)中的应用进行快速综述,以及目前启动ECMO的适应症和禁忌症。我们回顾了静脉-静脉(V-V) ECMO和静脉-动脉(V-A) ECMO在卡片中的应用。发现sv - v ECMO是大多数需要卡内ECMO支持的患者采用的主要ECMO模式。虽然COVID-19患者的V-V ECMO持续时间长于非COVID-19 ARDS患者的V-V ECMO,但死亡率相似。回顾的荟萃分析报告称,需要V-V ECMO的COVID-19患者的住院死亡率为37%至49%。结论ECMO对COVID-19合并严重心肺衰竭患者的生存益处尚不明确,但在资源允许的情况下,对成人COVID-19合并严重心肺损害患者可考虑V-V ECMO。严重心力衰竭的COVID-19患者可以考虑V-A ECMO,但关于生存益处的数据有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Methylene Blue in Management of Vasoplegic Shock Secondary to Primidone Overdose Emergency Airway Management due to Angioedema Successful ECMO Decannulation after (103 Days) Due to COVID-19 Infection: A Case Report The Use of the Pulse Oximeter in Limb Ischemia: The Pulse Study An In-Depth Analysis of the Multi-Faceted Benefits of Cytosorb Filter Utilization during Cardiopulmonary Bypass
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1