The Show Must Go On

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Zeitschrift Fur Arbeits-Und Organisationspsychologie Pub Date : 2021-09-16 DOI:10.1026/0932-4089/a000369
Laura Klebe, Katharina Klug, J. Felfe
{"title":"The Show Must Go On","authors":"Laura Klebe, Katharina Klug, J. Felfe","doi":"10.1026/0932-4089/a000369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. By disrupting routines at work, the Covid-19 pandemic may have undermined the extent and effectiveness of health-oriented leadership (HoL) in terms of staff-care and self-care. In a survey with two measurement points in the spring of 2020 ( Nt1=264; Nt2=123), we examined whether the stronger the crisis the lower HoL is, while becoming more effective in terms of follower health. Crisis severity turned out to be indirectly related to exhaustion via staff-care and self-care. Staff-care was more effective for follower health the stronger the crisis was. The results were largely supported in a subsample when exhaustion was measured 1 week later. Moreover, the Covid-19 pandemic was indirectly related to crisis severity via hindrance stressors. Findings underline that staff-care was jeopardized but gained in importance during the pandemic. By displaying staff-care, leaders can buffer negative crisis effects on followers. Organizations should strengthen HoL to protect the health of both leaders and followers during crises.","PeriodicalId":44883,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Arbeits-Und Organisationspsychologie","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Arbeits-Und Organisationspsychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000369","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Abstract. By disrupting routines at work, the Covid-19 pandemic may have undermined the extent and effectiveness of health-oriented leadership (HoL) in terms of staff-care and self-care. In a survey with two measurement points in the spring of 2020 ( Nt1=264; Nt2=123), we examined whether the stronger the crisis the lower HoL is, while becoming more effective in terms of follower health. Crisis severity turned out to be indirectly related to exhaustion via staff-care and self-care. Staff-care was more effective for follower health the stronger the crisis was. The results were largely supported in a subsample when exhaustion was measured 1 week later. Moreover, the Covid-19 pandemic was indirectly related to crisis severity via hindrance stressors. Findings underline that staff-care was jeopardized but gained in importance during the pandemic. By displaying staff-care, leaders can buffer negative crisis effects on followers. Organizations should strengthen HoL to protect the health of both leaders and followers during crises.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
演出必须继续
摘要Covid-19大流行扰乱了日常工作,可能削弱了以健康为导向的领导在员工护理和自我保健方面的程度和有效性。在2020年春季有两个测点的调查中(Nt1=264;Nt2=123),我们检验了危机越强,HoL是否越低,而在追随者健康方面变得更有效。结果表明,危机严重程度与员工照顾和自我照顾间接相关。危机越严重,员工关怀对追随者健康越有效。当一周后测量耗竭时,结果在很大程度上支持子样本。此外,新冠肺炎大流行通过障碍压力源与危机严重程度间接相关。调查结果强调,在大流行期间,工作人员护理受到了损害,但变得更加重要。通过表现出对员工的关心,领导者可以缓冲危机对下属的负面影响。组织应加强HoL,以在危机期间保护领导者和下属的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: In Kooperation mit der Sektion Arbeits-, Betriebs- und Organisationspsychologie im Berufsverband Deutscher Psychologen (BDP)
期刊最新文献
Effects of Idle Time on Well-Being: An Experimental Study Divergent Mental Models as a Trigger of Team Adaptation Das Konstrukt der „vollständigen Tätigkeit“ als Ziel guter Arbeitsgestaltung Digital gestresst durch Vorgesetzte? When to Think Like a Scientist
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1