PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OF BIBLICAL SCHOLARSHIP IN LATVIA

E. Petrenko, Dace Balode
{"title":"PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OF BIBLICAL SCHOLARSHIP IN LATVIA","authors":"E. Petrenko, Dace Balode","doi":"10.7833/120-1-2054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How did geo-politics and history influence the development of biblical scholarship in Latvia in the last one hundred years (1920-present)? This essay explores the three major periods of Latvia’s recent history – the first period of Latvian independence (1920-1940), the Soviet occupation (1940-1990), and the second period of Latvian independence (from 1990 onwards) – and it shows that a constant throughout these three periods is how German scholarship and the historical-critical method have shaped biblical studies in Latvia. The first period of independence was considered the ‘golden age’ of biblical exegesis in contrast with the period of Soviet occupation, when there was a stagnation of biblical scholarship and a disconnect with the progressive scholarly debate in the West, as well as a distorted hermeneutical framework. The revived hope of a robust biblical scholarship in the second period of independence also resurrected the long-standing dispute between the perceived liberal and conservative approaches to biblical studies and theology, and re-established the divide between the Faculty of Theology and other theological institutions. This has weakened the relationship between academic theological education and church life, and limited cooperation and biblical debate between scholars and institutions. Furthermore, long-standing German influence in biblical scholarship has been slowly giving way to a wider international scholarly community. This paper concludes that the future of biblical scholarship in Latvia needs to develop on a national and international level. Scholars and institutions need to learn how to cooperate towards robust biblical research and establish a dialogue with not just the German-speaking world but also the wider international (English-speaking) community. This will bring Latvian scholars to an environment where they can engage with and contribute to the international biblical debate.","PeriodicalId":44409,"journal":{"name":"Scriptura-International Journal of Bible Religion and Theology in Southern Africa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scriptura-International Journal of Bible Religion and Theology in Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7833/120-1-2054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How did geo-politics and history influence the development of biblical scholarship in Latvia in the last one hundred years (1920-present)? This essay explores the three major periods of Latvia’s recent history – the first period of Latvian independence (1920-1940), the Soviet occupation (1940-1990), and the second period of Latvian independence (from 1990 onwards) – and it shows that a constant throughout these three periods is how German scholarship and the historical-critical method have shaped biblical studies in Latvia. The first period of independence was considered the ‘golden age’ of biblical exegesis in contrast with the period of Soviet occupation, when there was a stagnation of biblical scholarship and a disconnect with the progressive scholarly debate in the West, as well as a distorted hermeneutical framework. The revived hope of a robust biblical scholarship in the second period of independence also resurrected the long-standing dispute between the perceived liberal and conservative approaches to biblical studies and theology, and re-established the divide between the Faculty of Theology and other theological institutions. This has weakened the relationship between academic theological education and church life, and limited cooperation and biblical debate between scholars and institutions. Furthermore, long-standing German influence in biblical scholarship has been slowly giving way to a wider international scholarly community. This paper concludes that the future of biblical scholarship in Latvia needs to develop on a national and international level. Scholars and institutions need to learn how to cooperate towards robust biblical research and establish a dialogue with not just the German-speaking world but also the wider international (English-speaking) community. This will bring Latvian scholars to an environment where they can engage with and contribute to the international biblical debate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉脱维亚圣经学术的过去、现在和未来
在过去一百年(1920年至今),地缘政治和历史如何影响拉脱维亚圣经学术的发展?本文探讨了拉脱维亚近史的三个主要时期——拉脱维亚独立的第一个时期(1920-1940)、苏联占领时期(1940-1990)和拉脱维亚独立的第二个时期(从1990年起)——并表明,贯穿这三个时期的一个不变之处是德国学术和历史批判方法如何塑造了拉脱维亚的圣经研究。独立的第一个时期被认为是圣经训诂学的“黄金时代”,与苏联占领时期形成对比,当时圣经学术停滞不前,与西方进步的学术辩论脱节,以及扭曲的解释学框架。在独立的第二个时期,对强大的圣经学术的重新燃起的希望,也重新激起了长期以来在圣经研究和神学方面的自由和保守方法之间的争论,并重新建立了神学院和其他神学机构之间的分歧。这削弱了学术神学教育和教会生活之间的关系,限制了学者和机构之间的合作和圣经辩论。此外,长期以来德国对圣经学术的影响正慢慢让位于更广泛的国际学术团体。本文的结论是,拉脱维亚圣经学术的未来需要在国家和国际层面上发展。学者和机构需要学习如何合作开展强有力的圣经研究,并不仅与德语世界,而且与更广泛的国际(英语)社区建立对话。这将把拉脱维亚学者带到一个他们可以参与并为国际圣经辩论做出贡献的环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Studi Efikasi Diri terhadap Komunikasi Non-Verbal dalam Karakter Utama Film The Pursuit of Happiness Digital Divide and Digital Literacy During the Covid-19 Pandemic Search Engine Optimization (SEO) for Journalistic Content in Building Brand Image for Innovation Products Kompetensi Komunikasi sebagai Faktor Keberhasilan dalam Pelaksanaan Program Kampus Mengajar (Studi Kasus di SD Negeri Sinaba Kasemen Kota Serang) The Social Construction of the Rebo Wekasan Ritual in Building Collective Trust in the Karundang Tengah Community to Increase Social Resilience During the COVID-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1