Biopolitics in the Time of Pandemic: Populism and Neoliberalism in the Light of COVID-19

IF 0.5 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Perspectives on Global Development and Technology Pub Date : 2021-03-25 DOI:10.1163/15691497-12341587
Rafal Soborski
{"title":"Biopolitics in the Time of Pandemic: Populism and Neoliberalism in the Light of COVID-19","authors":"Rafal Soborski","doi":"10.1163/15691497-12341587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Populism is at the center of many debates about socio-political aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic However, pondering questions such as, “Is coronavirus bad for populism?” or “How do populist leaders respond to it?” is unlikely to bring significant insights into the distribution and operation of power in the context of COVID-19, or more generally The populist label is used by elites to describe any politics that they dismiss, whether right- or left-wing, rendering populism an empty and incoherent concept This point is supported by developments associated with COVID-19 as attitudes of “populist” regimes towards the pandemic varied and some of them followed the same strategies as those pursued by “non-populist” governments This article reveals the limited explanatory utility of the concept of populism and proposes shifting the focus of attention towards neoliberalism as a key factor shaping individual countries' responses to the ongoing biopolitical challenge © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2021","PeriodicalId":43666,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Global Development and Technology","volume":"393 1","pages":"137-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Global Development and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15691497-12341587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Populism is at the center of many debates about socio-political aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic However, pondering questions such as, “Is coronavirus bad for populism?” or “How do populist leaders respond to it?” is unlikely to bring significant insights into the distribution and operation of power in the context of COVID-19, or more generally The populist label is used by elites to describe any politics that they dismiss, whether right- or left-wing, rendering populism an empty and incoherent concept This point is supported by developments associated with COVID-19 as attitudes of “populist” regimes towards the pandemic varied and some of them followed the same strategies as those pursued by “non-populist” governments This article reveals the limited explanatory utility of the concept of populism and proposes shifting the focus of attention towards neoliberalism as a key factor shaping individual countries' responses to the ongoing biopolitical challenge © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2021
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大流行时期的生命政治:新冠肺炎背景下的民粹主义和新自由主义
民粹主义是关于COVID-19大流行的社会政治方面的许多争论的中心,然而,思考诸如“冠状病毒对民粹主义有害吗?”或“民粹主义领导人会如何应对?”“不太可能对新冠疫情背景下的权力分配和运作带来重要见解,或者更广泛地说,民粹主义的标签被精英们用来描述他们所排斥的任何政治,无论是右翼还是左翼,这一点得到了与COVID-19相关的事态发展的支持,因为“民粹主义”政权对大流行的态度各不相同,其中一些政权遵循了与“非民粹主义”政府所追求的相同策略。本文揭示了民粹主义概念的有限解释效用,并建议将注意力转移到新自由主义上,作为塑造个别国家应对当前疫情的关键因素生物政治挑战©Koninklijke Brill NV,莱顿,2021
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Global Development and Technology (PGDT) is a peer-reviewed journal for the discussion of current social sciences research on diverse socio-economic development issues that reflect the opportunities and threats brought about by the world order shift from bipolar to global, the present economic liberalization that constricts development options, and the new enabling technologies of the Information Age. A founding principle of PGDT is that all people are entitled to scientific and technological knowledge to promote human development. PGDT is the international forum where the questions associated with this endeavour are thoroughly examinated and clearly communicated.
期刊最新文献
Social Media and Emergence of Neo-Traditional Protests: Exploring Communicative Ecology of Oromo Protests in Ethiopia The Effects of the Developments in Artificial Intelligence and Open-Access Software on the Visions of Academicians Manifestation of the Socio-Psychological Impact of COVID-19 in Selected Contexts around the Globe Navigating the Future of Education: Harnessing Data Mining to Illuminate Pathways to Success Advancing Sustainable Development Goals through Enhanced Literacy in Nuclear Science and Technology: Emphasizing Hands-On Experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1