Media lost and found: the medieval understanding of the history of artistic techniques

IF 0.1 N/A ART Quintana-Revista do Departamento de Historia da Arte Pub Date : 2018-12-29 DOI:10.15304/qui.16.5592

E. Inglis

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Este artículo aborda el estudio de textos medievales que hacen referencia a técnicas perdidas y recuperadas. Escritos, la mayor parte, por autores eclesiásticos, estos textos testimonian cómo en la Edad Media se entendieron objetos y técnicas en un contexto histórico. Demuestran que en la Edad Media se utilizaban las técnicas para establecer una periodización de la producción artística, a diferencia de lo que hacían los autores antiguos o del Renacimiento que priorizaron el logro y la decadencia de las habilidades representacionales. Esta periodización está ligada a la historia local o institucional.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

媒介失而复得:对中世纪艺术技法历史的理解

这篇文章讨论了中世纪文本的研究，涉及丢失和恢复的技术。这些文本大多由教会作家撰写，证明了中世纪的物品和技术是如何在历史背景下被理解的。它们表明，在中世纪，技术被用来建立艺术生产的分期，而不是古代或文艺复兴时期的作家优先考虑表现技能的成就和衰落。这种分期与当地或机构的历史有关。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Quintana-Revista do Departamento de Historia da Arte ART-

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： QUINTANA is a journal about the history of art, issued annually, which publishes original research papers about any of the specialities related to the Arts, including interdisciplinary approaches that enrich their study. The publication of research papers is structured in two sections: the first one -SUBJECT- is of a monographic character, and its content is planned beforehand by the Editorial Board, who invites well-known specialists in the chosen theme, whilst the second one -ARTICLES- is open to contributions about any theme. The papers which are presented in the ARTICLES section will be subjected to assessment using a double-blind review process with anonymity for both authors and reviewers (peer-review process). The journal will use two reviewers, members of the Scientific Committee or academic experts, to assess each article received, and will resort to a third reviewer in the case of discrepancy. The articles which are finally published will include reception and acceptance dates. The journal’s Director and the Editorial Board will have ultimate responsibility for the selection process, and will communicate the editorial decisions to the authors.