When More Is Too Much: Compound Caregiving, Barriers to Services, and Service Support for Older Families of People With Disabilities

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Families in Society-The Journal of Contemporary Social Services Pub Date : 2021-12-11 DOI:10.1177/10443894211048456
P. Samuel, Kathryn Wright, C. Marsack-Topolewski, Rosanne DiZazzo-Miller
{"title":"When More Is Too Much: Compound Caregiving, Barriers to Services, and Service Support for Older Families of People With Disabilities","authors":"P. Samuel, Kathryn Wright, C. Marsack-Topolewski, Rosanne DiZazzo-Miller","doi":"10.1177/10443894211048456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the theoretical lens of Family Quality of Life, this study evaluated perceptions of older compound caregivers (i.e., caring for more than one family member) regarding their need for services. Quantitative analysis of cross-sectional data collected from 112 caregivers (50 years and older) demonstrated that compound caregivers faced more barriers in accessing services for their families than noncompound caregivers. Although all caregivers shared similar perceptions on the importance, opportunities, initiative, and attainment of service support for their families, compound caregivers had lower stability and satisfaction than noncompound caregivers. Findings highlight the need to develop support programs to equip older caregivers in managing their daily challenges at the individual and family level.","PeriodicalId":47463,"journal":{"name":"Families in Society-The Journal of Contemporary Social Services","volume":"1 1","pages":"180 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families in Society-The Journal of Contemporary Social Services","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10443894211048456","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Using the theoretical lens of Family Quality of Life, this study evaluated perceptions of older compound caregivers (i.e., caring for more than one family member) regarding their need for services. Quantitative analysis of cross-sectional data collected from 112 caregivers (50 years and older) demonstrated that compound caregivers faced more barriers in accessing services for their families than noncompound caregivers. Although all caregivers shared similar perceptions on the importance, opportunities, initiative, and attainment of service support for their families, compound caregivers had lower stability and satisfaction than noncompound caregivers. Findings highlight the need to develop support programs to equip older caregivers in managing their daily challenges at the individual and family level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当更多是太多:复合护理,服务障碍,以及对老年残疾人家庭的服务支持
利用家庭生活质量的理论视角,本研究评估了老年复合照顾者(即照顾一个以上家庭成员)对其服务需求的看法。从112名护理人员(50岁及以上)收集的横截面数据的定量分析表明,复合护理人员比非复合护理人员在为其家庭获得服务方面面临更多障碍。虽然所有照护者对家庭服务支持的重要性、机会、主动性和获得程度有相似的认识,但复合照护者的稳定性和满意度低于非复合照护者。研究结果强调,需要制定支持方案,使老年护理人员能够在个人和家庭层面上应对日常挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Experiences and Service Utilization of American Indian/Alaskan Native Kinship Caregivers in Kinship Navigator Programs Across Washington State Initial Evidence for the Reliability and Validity of New Survey Measures to Evaluate Family Outcomes of Kinship and Adoption Navigator Programs Preventive Legal Services for Kinship Care: Reducing the Need for Foster Care with Family First Conceptualizations of Permanency in an Online Foster Care Community The Experiences of Asian Americans Who Intermarry in the United States: A Qualitative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1