A percepção do bibliotecário universitário sobre a ética no tratamento temático da informação

L. Oliveira
{"title":"A percepção do bibliotecário universitário sobre a ética no tratamento temático da informação","authors":"L. Oliveira","doi":"10.21747/21836671/pag19a9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is focused on the subject representation based on a reflective perspective in terms of ethics in the field. It aims to analyze the professional perception of Brazilian university librarians about ethics in subject representation. It is a descriptive study of a quantitative nature that usesthe application of online survey, which was applied to professionals in charge of managing the technical processing section of university libraries located in federal public universities in Brazil. The results demonstrate that ethics is well assimilated by technical processingmanagers, even though they face interpretive dilemmas as well as a major concern about indexing process and its embodiment via term. Despite every care in the equal treatment of the different issues, reported by the respondents, inconsistent substitutes are still echoing in the information retrieval system, making it necessary to seek training and unrestricted use of documentary instruments in order to avoid biased interpretations and representations. Simultaneously, qualification, collaboration and participation of the user are understood as a way of supporting the ethical instance of the subject representation, as well as the need for further evolution of the library literature within thisperspective. It is concluded that the ethical dimension in the subject representation is understood by Brazilian university librarians who can identify impasses, difficulties, problems, solutions and needs for greater assertiveness in this context.","PeriodicalId":30970,"journal":{"name":"Paginas ab","volume":"272 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paginas ab","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21747/21836671/pag19a9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is focused on the subject representation based on a reflective perspective in terms of ethics in the field. It aims to analyze the professional perception of Brazilian university librarians about ethics in subject representation. It is a descriptive study of a quantitative nature that usesthe application of online survey, which was applied to professionals in charge of managing the technical processing section of university libraries located in federal public universities in Brazil. The results demonstrate that ethics is well assimilated by technical processingmanagers, even though they face interpretive dilemmas as well as a major concern about indexing process and its embodiment via term. Despite every care in the equal treatment of the different issues, reported by the respondents, inconsistent substitutes are still echoing in the information retrieval system, making it necessary to seek training and unrestricted use of documentary instruments in order to avoid biased interpretations and representations. Simultaneously, qualification, collaboration and participation of the user are understood as a way of supporting the ethical instance of the subject representation, as well as the need for further evolution of the library literature within thisperspective. It is concluded that the ethical dimension in the subject representation is understood by Brazilian university librarians who can identify impasses, difficulties, problems, solutions and needs for greater assertiveness in this context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学图书馆员对信息专题处理伦理的看法
本研究主要是基于反思的视角,从伦理学的角度对主体表征进行研究。本研究旨在分析巴西大学图书馆员对学科表现伦理的专业认知。这是一个定量性质的描述性研究,使用在线调查的应用,这是适用于负责管理位于巴西联邦公立大学的大学图书馆的技术处理部分的专业人员。结果表明,尽管技术处理管理者面临解释困境以及对索引过程及其在术语中的体现的主要担忧,但他们仍能很好地吸收伦理。尽管答复者报告在平等对待不同问题方面尽了一切努力,但在资料检索系统中仍然存在不一致的替代品,因此有必要寻求培训和不受限制地使用单据文书,以避免有偏见的解释和陈述。同时,用户的资格、协作和参与被理解为支持主题表现的道德实例的一种方式,以及在这个角度下图书馆文献进一步发展的需要。结论是,巴西大学图书馆员能够理解主题代表中的道德维度,他们可以识别僵局、困难、问题、解决方案,并在这种情况下需要更大的自信。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
O contexto de uso do termo Arquivos Comunitários a partir da vertente dos estudos críticos e decoloniais uma análise terminológica pontual Dados Bibliográficos definições e interlocuções com as tecnologias e a inovação Informação e memória, biblioteca e memória o caso EMATER/MG Gestão de riscos em arquivos proposição de um método para priorização de ações para o impedimento da perda do patrimônio documental A percepção do bibliotecário universitário sobre a ética no tratamento temático da informação
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1