{"title":"Mening med vrøvlet","authors":"Claus K. Madsen, Lea Allouche","doi":"10.14811/clr.v44.605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Making Sense of Nonsense: Readings of Children’s Poetry as Play and Creative Thinking \nAbstract: Nonsense and meaning are not necessarily conflicting concepts, but can be conceived of as a hendiadys, that is, not opposites, the one or the other, but as one and the other. The idea that meaning and nonsense are related and coexist is a premise for this article, which describes different structures of meaning in the nonsense poetry of Birgitte Krogsbøll and Kamilla Wichmann’s picture book Funkelgnister: Rim, råb og remser (2015, Glittersparks: Rhymes, Roars and Rigmaroles). By linking our analysis of Funkelgnister to Johan Huizinga’s theory of play as a prerequisite for culture, we reveal how the specific structures and logics of the poems generate meaning and thereby we disclose how children’s nonsense poetry is simultaneously meaningful and nonsensical, as a creative thinking akin to culture developed through play and playfulness. We describe how meaning can be sought in three directions, suggested by Gilles Deleuze: above, below and on the surface. In the first case, we consider nonsense as a seductive acoustic phenomenon. In the second, we focus on nonsense poetry as subversive. And finally, in the third case, we show how it is an event. In all, these different aspects demonstrate how nonsense poetry functions as play and challenges our understanding of what it means to read. Following Jurij Lotman’s understanding of pictorial language as creative thinking, we show how nonsense in Funkelgnister opens up a free space by utilizing an in-between, where meaning takes on different forms as signs and sounds, and how the inherent rejection of normative rules of reading in such a venture, initiates a production of meaning as metonymic activity. We thereby highlight how nonsense generates a ground for a creative development of meaning. ","PeriodicalId":52259,"journal":{"name":"Barnboken","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Barnboken","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14811/clr.v44.605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Making Sense of Nonsense: Readings of Children’s Poetry as Play and Creative Thinking
Abstract: Nonsense and meaning are not necessarily conflicting concepts, but can be conceived of as a hendiadys, that is, not opposites, the one or the other, but as one and the other. The idea that meaning and nonsense are related and coexist is a premise for this article, which describes different structures of meaning in the nonsense poetry of Birgitte Krogsbøll and Kamilla Wichmann’s picture book Funkelgnister: Rim, råb og remser (2015, Glittersparks: Rhymes, Roars and Rigmaroles). By linking our analysis of Funkelgnister to Johan Huizinga’s theory of play as a prerequisite for culture, we reveal how the specific structures and logics of the poems generate meaning and thereby we disclose how children’s nonsense poetry is simultaneously meaningful and nonsensical, as a creative thinking akin to culture developed through play and playfulness. We describe how meaning can be sought in three directions, suggested by Gilles Deleuze: above, below and on the surface. In the first case, we consider nonsense as a seductive acoustic phenomenon. In the second, we focus on nonsense poetry as subversive. And finally, in the third case, we show how it is an event. In all, these different aspects demonstrate how nonsense poetry functions as play and challenges our understanding of what it means to read. Following Jurij Lotman’s understanding of pictorial language as creative thinking, we show how nonsense in Funkelgnister opens up a free space by utilizing an in-between, where meaning takes on different forms as signs and sounds, and how the inherent rejection of normative rules of reading in such a venture, initiates a production of meaning as metonymic activity. We thereby highlight how nonsense generates a ground for a creative development of meaning.
摘要:无意义与意义并不一定是相互冲突的概念,而是可以被理解为一种偶合,即不是对立的,不是一个或另一个,而是一个和另一个。本文以意义与无意义相互关联并共存为前提,描述了Birgitte krossbø ll和Kamilla wiichmann的绘本《Funkelgnister: Rim, r b og remser》(2015,Glittersparks: Rhymes, Roars and Rigmaroles)中无意义诗歌的不同意义结构。通过将我们对Funkelgnister的分析与Johan Huizinga的游戏作为文化先决条件的理论联系起来,我们揭示了诗歌的特定结构和逻辑是如何产生意义的,从而我们揭示了儿童的无意义诗歌如何同时具有意义和无意义,作为一种创造性思维,类似于通过游戏和游戏性发展起来的文化。根据吉尔·德勒兹(Gilles Deleuze)的建议,我们描述了如何从三个方向寻找意义:上面、下面和表面。在第一种情况下,我们认为无稽之谈是一种诱人的声音现象。第二,我们把重点放在无意义诗歌的颠覆性上。最后,在第三种情况下,我们说明它是一个事件。总之,这些不同的方面展示了无意义诗歌如何发挥游戏的作用,并挑战了我们对阅读意义的理解。根据Jurij Lotman对图像语言作为创造性思维的理解,我们展示了Funkelgnister中的无意义如何通过利用中间空间打开一个自由的空间,其中意义以不同的形式作为符号和声音,以及如何在这种冒险中对规范阅读规则的固有拒绝,引发了作为转喻活动的意义生产。因此,我们强调无意义是如何为意义的创造性发展创造基础的。