Prescription analysis of rheumatology and endocrinology departments of a teaching hospital in Western India

V. Yadav, S. Jaiswal, S. Shyam
{"title":"Prescription analysis of rheumatology and endocrinology departments of a teaching hospital in Western India","authors":"V. Yadav, S. Jaiswal, S. Shyam","doi":"10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_26_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Prescription analysis is the simplest method to observe the current treatment practice in any health-care setting. Biopharmaceuticals are a class of drugs that hold great promise in treating diseases. In recent years, there has been an increase in their consumption. The present analysis was carried out to obtain data on the prescribing patterns and the prevalence of the use of biologics in two departments of a tertiary care hospital through a cross-sectional study. Methodology: The study was conducted as an observational study in the departments of rheumatology and endocrinology of a tertiary care hospital in western India. Data were collected from the prescription notebooks or medical case sheets of patients on treatment in the outpatient departments (OPDs) or wards by the rheumatologists or endocrinologists of the hospital. The World Health Organization core drug use indicators for drug prescription analysis were calculated. Results: A total of 4684 drugs had been prescribed in the 874 patient encounters analyzed with the average number of drugs per prescription being 5.36. While 13.3% of prescriptions in the rheumatology department contained a biologic, more than 55% of prescriptions in the endocrinology department contained a biologic. The commonly used biologics were infliximab and etanercept in the rheumatology department and insulin analogs in the endocrinology department. Conclusion: The use of eight types of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis patients in this study is an indicator of active monitoring of the disease and early intervention. The present study has brought out the rational use of biologics such as infliximab and etanercept in rheumatology and insulin analogs in the endocrinology departments of the hospital.","PeriodicalId":32638,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_26_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prescription analysis is the simplest method to observe the current treatment practice in any health-care setting. Biopharmaceuticals are a class of drugs that hold great promise in treating diseases. In recent years, there has been an increase in their consumption. The present analysis was carried out to obtain data on the prescribing patterns and the prevalence of the use of biologics in two departments of a tertiary care hospital through a cross-sectional study. Methodology: The study was conducted as an observational study in the departments of rheumatology and endocrinology of a tertiary care hospital in western India. Data were collected from the prescription notebooks or medical case sheets of patients on treatment in the outpatient departments (OPDs) or wards by the rheumatologists or endocrinologists of the hospital. The World Health Organization core drug use indicators for drug prescription analysis were calculated. Results: A total of 4684 drugs had been prescribed in the 874 patient encounters analyzed with the average number of drugs per prescription being 5.36. While 13.3% of prescriptions in the rheumatology department contained a biologic, more than 55% of prescriptions in the endocrinology department contained a biologic. The commonly used biologics were infliximab and etanercept in the rheumatology department and insulin analogs in the endocrinology department. Conclusion: The use of eight types of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis patients in this study is an indicator of active monitoring of the disease and early intervention. The present study has brought out the rational use of biologics such as infliximab and etanercept in rheumatology and insulin analogs in the endocrinology departments of the hospital.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西印度某教学医院风湿病科和内分泌科处方分析
背景:处方分析是在任何卫生保健机构中观察当前治疗实践的最简单方法。生物制药是一类在治疗疾病方面有很大希望的药物。近年来,他们的消费有所增加。目前的分析是通过横断面研究,在三级护理医院的两个部门获得处方模式和使用生物制剂的流行率的数据。方法:本研究是在印度西部一家三级医院的风湿病科和内分泌科进行的一项观察性研究。数据由医院的风湿病学家或内分泌学家从门诊(OPDs)或病房治疗的患者的处方笔记本或病历中收集。计算了用于药物处方分析的世界卫生组织核心药物使用指标。结果:874例患者共开处方4684种药物,平均处方药物数为5.36种。风湿病科13.3%的处方含有生物制剂,而内分泌科超过55%的处方含有生物制剂。风湿病科常用的是英夫利昔单抗和依那西普,内分泌科常用的是胰岛素类似物。结论:本研究中类风湿关节炎患者使用8种生物制剂是积极监测疾病和早期干预的指标。本研究为医院内分泌科合理应用英夫利昔单抗、依那西普等生物制剂治疗风湿病及胰岛素类似物提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of transfusion-transmitted infection and reactive donor response rate in a tertiary care hospital in South India: A retrospective observational study Corynebacterium jeikeium from exudative pharyngitis: A close mimicker of Corynebacterium diphtheriae Impact of evidence-based pedagogical approach on clinical reasoning among undergraduate physical therapy students Capnography troubleshooting: Lessons learned from laparoscopic hernia surgery A review on the crisis of antibiotic resistance and the strategies to combat resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1