Health-related misinformation and public governance of COVID-19 in South Africa

IF 2.1 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Digital Policy Regulation and Governance Pub Date : 2023-01-20 DOI:10.1108/dprg-12-2021-0163
Paul Kariuki, L. Ofusori, M. Goyayi, P. Subramaniam
{"title":"Health-related misinformation and public governance of COVID-19 in South Africa","authors":"Paul Kariuki, L. Ofusori, M. Goyayi, P. Subramaniam","doi":"10.1108/dprg-12-2021-0163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper was to examine health-related misinformation proliferation during COVID-19 pandemic and its implications on public governance in South Africa.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nBecause of COVID-19 related restrictions, this study conducted a systematic review. The researchers searched several search engines which include PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus to identify relevant studies. A total of 252 peer reviewed research papers were identified. These research papers were furthered filtered, and a total of 44 relevant papers were eventually selected\n\n\nFindings\nThere is a relationship between the spread of health-related misinformation and public governance. Government coordination and institutional coherence across the different spheres of governance is affected when there are multiple sources of information that are unverified and uncoordinated.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study was limited to a systematic review because of COVID-19 restrictions, and therefore, actual data could not be collected. Moreover, this study was limited to health-related communication, and therefore, its findings can only be generalized to the health sector.\n\n\nPractical implications\nFuture research in this subject should consider actual data collection from the departments of health and communications to gain an in-depth understanding of misinformation and its implications on public governance from their perspective as frontline departments as far as government communication is concerned.\n\n\nSocial implications\nMisinformation is an impediment to any fight against a public health emergency. Institutions which regulate communications technology and monitor misinformation should work harder in enforcing the law to deter information peddlers from their practice. This calls for reviewing existing regulation so that online spaces are safer for communicating health-related information.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nEffective health communication remains a priority for the South African Government during COVID-19. However, with health-related misinformation on the increase, it is imperative to mitigate the spread to ensure it does not impede effective public governance. Government departments in South Africa are yet to develop policies that mitigate the spread of misinformation, and this paper may assist them in doing so.\n","PeriodicalId":56357,"journal":{"name":"Digital Policy Regulation and Governance","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Policy Regulation and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-12-2021-0163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper was to examine health-related misinformation proliferation during COVID-19 pandemic and its implications on public governance in South Africa. Design/methodology/approach Because of COVID-19 related restrictions, this study conducted a systematic review. The researchers searched several search engines which include PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus to identify relevant studies. A total of 252 peer reviewed research papers were identified. These research papers were furthered filtered, and a total of 44 relevant papers were eventually selected Findings There is a relationship between the spread of health-related misinformation and public governance. Government coordination and institutional coherence across the different spheres of governance is affected when there are multiple sources of information that are unverified and uncoordinated. Research limitations/implications This study was limited to a systematic review because of COVID-19 restrictions, and therefore, actual data could not be collected. Moreover, this study was limited to health-related communication, and therefore, its findings can only be generalized to the health sector. Practical implications Future research in this subject should consider actual data collection from the departments of health and communications to gain an in-depth understanding of misinformation and its implications on public governance from their perspective as frontline departments as far as government communication is concerned. Social implications Misinformation is an impediment to any fight against a public health emergency. Institutions which regulate communications technology and monitor misinformation should work harder in enforcing the law to deter information peddlers from their practice. This calls for reviewing existing regulation so that online spaces are safer for communicating health-related information. Originality/value Effective health communication remains a priority for the South African Government during COVID-19. However, with health-related misinformation on the increase, it is imperative to mitigate the spread to ensure it does not impede effective public governance. Government departments in South Africa are yet to develop policies that mitigate the spread of misinformation, and this paper may assist them in doing so.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非与健康相关的错误信息和COVID-19的公共治理
本文的目的是研究COVID-19大流行期间与健康相关的错误信息扩散及其对南非公共治理的影响。设计/方法/方法由于COVID-19相关限制,本研究进行了系统评价。研究人员搜索了几个搜索引擎,包括PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus,以确定相关研究。共确定了252篇同行评议的研究论文。对这些研究论文进行进一步筛选,最终筛选出44篇相关论文。研究发现:与健康相关的错误信息的传播与公共治理之间存在关系。当存在多个未经核实和未经协调的信息来源时,不同治理领域的政府协调和机构一致性就会受到影响。研究局限性/意义由于COVID-19的限制,本研究仅限于系统评价,因此无法收集实际数据。此外,这项研究仅限于与卫生有关的交流,因此,其研究结果只能推广到卫生部门。实际意义未来的研究应该考虑从卫生和通信部门收集的实际数据,从他们作为政府传播的一线部门的角度深入了解错误信息及其对公共治理的影响。社会影响错误信息是对抗突发公共卫生事件的障碍。监管通信技术和监控虚假信息的机构应加大执法力度,遏制信息贩子的行为。这就要求对现有法规进行审查,以使在线空间更安全地交流与健康有关的信息。创意/价值在2019冠状病毒病期间,有效的卫生沟通仍然是南非政府的优先事项。然而,随着与健康有关的错误信息不断增加,必须减缓传播,以确保它不会妨碍有效的公共治理。南非的政府部门尚未制定减轻错误信息传播的政策,本文可能有助于他们这样做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digital Policy Regulation and Governance
Digital Policy Regulation and Governance INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Emerald holds journals from the current and previous year. We hold all older back volumes and can supply high quality reprints for most volumes that were previously out-of-print. Complete list of titles we can supply from this publisher Publisher''s web page and subscription information
期刊最新文献
Socio and macroeconomic determinants of mobile money adoption: a cross-cultural study of selected MENA and Sub-Saharan countries Adoption of digital payment FinTech service by Gen Y and Gen Z users: evidence from India Blockchain technology in foreign trade management: which blockchain alternative is more suitable? Enterprise architecture for the transformation of public services based on citizen’s feedback Blockchain for environmental peacebuilding: application in water management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1