Appropriate Sets of Criteria for Innovation Adoption of IS Security in Organizations

Sandy Kosasi, Vedyanto Vedyanto, I. D. Ayu Eka Yuliani
{"title":"Appropriate Sets of Criteria for Innovation Adoption of IS Security in Organizations","authors":"Sandy Kosasi, Vedyanto Vedyanto, I. D. Ayu Eka Yuliani","doi":"10.1109/EECSI.2018.8752816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Determining sets of criteria and alternatives becoming main priorities is essential to guarantee the success of innovation adoption of Information System (IS) security. The goal of this research was to select and determine important entities as representation of each criterion for managers in making decisions of innovation adoption of IS security. This research applied Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) Framework, and Human-Organization-Technology-Fit (HOT-Fit) Model to map relative importance variables of criteria and alternatives. AHP Approach was applied for computation simulation to determine priorities of criteria and alternatives. Results show that a principal criterion is manpower of organizations. The eigen factor score is 4.398. Moreover, alternatives covering complexity, financial resources, intensity of competition, and CIO innovativeness have these respective eigen factors scores: 4.326, 9.307, 4.376, and 4.545.","PeriodicalId":6543,"journal":{"name":"2018 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics (EECSI)","volume":"46 1","pages":"608-613"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics (EECSI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EECSI.2018.8752816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Determining sets of criteria and alternatives becoming main priorities is essential to guarantee the success of innovation adoption of Information System (IS) security. The goal of this research was to select and determine important entities as representation of each criterion for managers in making decisions of innovation adoption of IS security. This research applied Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) Framework, and Human-Organization-Technology-Fit (HOT-Fit) Model to map relative importance variables of criteria and alternatives. AHP Approach was applied for computation simulation to determine priorities of criteria and alternatives. Results show that a principal criterion is manpower of organizations. The eigen factor score is 4.398. Moreover, alternatives covering complexity, financial resources, intensity of competition, and CIO innovativeness have these respective eigen factors scores: 4.326, 9.307, 4.376, and 4.545.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织创新采用信息系统安全的适当标准
确定一套标准和替代方案成为主要优先事项,对于确保信息系统(is)安全创新采用的成功至关重要。本研究的目的是选择和确定重要的实体,作为管理者在制定创新采用信息系统安全决策时的每个标准的代表。本研究采用技术-组织-环境(TOE)框架和人-组织-技术-适合(HOT-Fit)模型来映射标准和备选方案的相对重要性变量。采用层次分析法进行计算仿真,确定准则和备选方案的优先级。结果表明,组织的人力资源是一个主要的衡量标准。特征因子得分为4.398。复杂性、财务资源、竞争强度和CIO创新的特征因子得分分别为4.326、9.307、4.376和4.545。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design of Low Noise Micro Liter Syringe Pump for Quartz Crystal Microbalance Sensor Development of Mobile Based Educational Game as a Learning Media for Basic Programming in VHS Sentiment Analysis Based on Appraisal Theory for Assessing Incumbent Electability Variance and Symmetrical-based Approach for Optimal Alignment of 3D Model Comparison of LFC Optimization on Micro-hydro using PID, CES, and SMES based Firefly Algorithm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1