Mystical techniques, mental processes, and states of consciousness in Abraham Abulafia’s Kabbalah: A reassessment

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Archive for the Psychology of Religion-Archiv Fur Religionspsychologie Pub Date : 2019-05-03 DOI:10.1177/0084672419839490
Vadim Putzu
{"title":"Mystical techniques, mental processes, and states of consciousness in Abraham Abulafia’s Kabbalah: A reassessment","authors":"Vadim Putzu","doi":"10.1177/0084672419839490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reevaluates the mystical techniques and experiences peculiar to Abraham Abulafia’s Kabbalah and attempts to offer an alternative approach to their dominant understanding, which largely depends on Moshe Idel’s work. Current scholars of Jewish mysticism have a habit of highlighting the “unique character” of Abulafia’s mystical practices while asserting that they cannot be compared with the induction techniques and the psychophysical phenomena typical of hypnosis. While generally agreeing with the scholars discussed that the hyperactivation of the mind found in Abulafian Kabbalah contrasts sharply with the mental relaxation attained through the mystical practices of other religious traditions, the present study takes issue with the current view of Abulafian Kabbalah’s relation to hypnotic procedures, processes, and states. This work addresses the issues present with the current view and offers a more inclusive model for interpreting Abulafia’s Kabbalah, drawing from psychiatrist Roland Fischer.","PeriodicalId":44899,"journal":{"name":"Archive for the Psychology of Religion-Archiv Fur Religionspsychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive for the Psychology of Religion-Archiv Fur Religionspsychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0084672419839490","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article reevaluates the mystical techniques and experiences peculiar to Abraham Abulafia’s Kabbalah and attempts to offer an alternative approach to their dominant understanding, which largely depends on Moshe Idel’s work. Current scholars of Jewish mysticism have a habit of highlighting the “unique character” of Abulafia’s mystical practices while asserting that they cannot be compared with the induction techniques and the psychophysical phenomena typical of hypnosis. While generally agreeing with the scholars discussed that the hyperactivation of the mind found in Abulafian Kabbalah contrasts sharply with the mental relaxation attained through the mystical practices of other religious traditions, the present study takes issue with the current view of Abulafian Kabbalah’s relation to hypnotic procedures, processes, and states. This work addresses the issues present with the current view and offers a more inclusive model for interpreting Abulafia’s Kabbalah, drawing from psychiatrist Roland Fischer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神秘技术,心理过程和意识状态在亚伯拉罕·阿布拉菲亚的卡巴拉:重新评估
本文重新评估了亚伯拉罕·阿布拉菲亚的卡巴拉特有的神秘技术和经验,并试图提供一种替代方法,以取代他们主要的理解,这在很大程度上取决于摩西·爱德尔的工作。当前的犹太神秘主义学者有一种习惯,即强调阿布拉菲亚神秘主义实践的“独特性”,同时声称它们无法与催眠的归纳技巧和典型的心理物理现象相提并论。虽然普遍同意学者们的讨论,即在阿布拉菲卡巴拉中发现的精神的过度激活与通过其他宗教传统的神秘实践获得的精神放松形成鲜明对比,但目前的研究对阿布拉菲卡巴拉与催眠过程、过程和状态的关系提出了质疑。这项工作解决了当前观点中存在的问题,并提供了一个更具包容性的模型来解释阿布拉菲亚的卡巴拉,借鉴了精神病学家罗兰·费舍尔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The international, peer-reviewed journal Archive for the Psychology of Religion/Archiv für Religionspsychologie is the oldest periodical that publishes research in the psychology of religion. It is the organ of the International Association for the Psychology of Religion (IAPR), founded in 1914. The Archive for the Psychology of Religion/Archiv für Religionspsychologie is open to all scientific methodologies, both quantitative and qualitative.
期刊最新文献
Intrinsic and extrinsic religious orientation as a moderator of key predictors of romantic relationship commitment The experience of, and beliefs about, divine grace in mainline protestant Christianity: A consensual qualitative approach Unpackaging gender differences in justifying morally debatable behaviors around the world: The role of personal religiosity and society’s socialization priorities for its children Contributions of Muslim medieval scholars to psychology A comprehensive literature review of Islam-oriented scales on religiosity, spirituality, and morality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1