Cross-acceptance of fire safety systems based on SIL equivalence in relation to IEC 61508 and EN 50129

Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/09617353.2022.2107255
Peter Okoh, H. Dong, Yiliu Liu
{"title":"Cross-acceptance of fire safety systems based on SIL equivalence in relation to IEC 61508 and EN 50129","authors":"Peter Okoh, H. Dong, Yiliu Liu","doi":"10.1080/09617353.2022.2107255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Several sectors, e.g. process, railway, etc., have set their functional safety standards based on the generic IEC 61508. Yet, a product that is originally developed based on IEC 61508 is not automatically accepted for use in specific industries. Therefore, companies that are keen on selling safety products across sectors are faced with the challenge of satisfying the requirements sector by sector, thus incurring more cost and time to market. Cross-acceptance across industries is expected to solve this problem. However, an approach with a quantitative focus (e.g. in relation to SIL) has yet to be identified and validated. Demonstrating consistency and compatibility between cross-domain standards in relation to system safety is necessary for harmonising safety integrity claims. This paper applies the relationship between PFDavg and THR to cross-acceptance, establishing SIL equivalence as a basis for cross-acceptance, supporting this with data prioritisation and recommending it together with architectural constraints, systematic capability, the original safety case, a supplementary safety case (accounting for differences between the original and target standards provisions), and the original safety manuals (for COTS components and the whole system) as a framework for achieving both IEC 61508 (generic) and EN 50129 (railway) certification for a fire detection system.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09617353.2022.2107255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Several sectors, e.g. process, railway, etc., have set their functional safety standards based on the generic IEC 61508. Yet, a product that is originally developed based on IEC 61508 is not automatically accepted for use in specific industries. Therefore, companies that are keen on selling safety products across sectors are faced with the challenge of satisfying the requirements sector by sector, thus incurring more cost and time to market. Cross-acceptance across industries is expected to solve this problem. However, an approach with a quantitative focus (e.g. in relation to SIL) has yet to be identified and validated. Demonstrating consistency and compatibility between cross-domain standards in relation to system safety is necessary for harmonising safety integrity claims. This paper applies the relationship between PFDavg and THR to cross-acceptance, establishing SIL equivalence as a basis for cross-acceptance, supporting this with data prioritisation and recommending it together with architectural constraints, systematic capability, the original safety case, a supplementary safety case (accounting for differences between the original and target standards provisions), and the original safety manuals (for COTS components and the whole system) as a framework for achieving both IEC 61508 (generic) and EN 50129 (railway) certification for a fire detection system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
基于与IEC 61508和EN 50129相关的SIL等效的消防安全系统的交叉验收
一些行业,如过程、铁路等,已经根据通用的IEC 61508制定了自己的功能安全标准。然而,最初基于IEC 61508开发的产品不会自动被接受用于特定行业。因此,热衷于跨行业销售安全产品的公司面临着逐个行业满足要求的挑战,从而产生更多的成本和上市时间。跨行业的交叉接受有望解决这个问题。然而,以定量为重点的方法(例如,与SIL相关的方法)还有待确定和验证。证明与系统安全相关的跨领域标准之间的一致性和兼容性对于协调安全完整性声明是必要的。本文将PFDavg和THR之间的关系应用于交叉接受,建立SIL等效性作为交叉接受的基础,通过数据优先级来支持这一点,并将其与架构约束、系统能力、原始安全案例、补充安全案例(考虑原始和目标标准规定之间的差异)一起推荐。以及原始的安全手册(用于COTS组件和整个系统),作为实现火灾探测系统的IEC 61508(通用)和EN 50129(铁路)认证的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1