Collaborative Community Design Processes in Rural and Urban Settlements in Thailand

Sadanu Sukkasame
{"title":"Collaborative Community Design Processes in Rural and Urban Settlements in Thailand","authors":"Sadanu Sukkasame","doi":"10.54028/nj2019177180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares two contrasting processes of low-income community design in rural and urban areas in Thailand. The low-income Srabot community in the urban area is constructing a new settlement on newly purchased land. In parallel, the indigenous Banggloy community is located in the National Park as a community who were forcibly evicted from their village home to an allocated area where they constructed dwellings in the new village. Both cases were supported by housing loans and funding from the Thai Community Organizations Development Institute (CODI)1. The aim of this paper is to examine collaborative learning process based on low-income community design. Both cases employed participatory housing and planning design workshops. The urban community focused on designing the community masterplan. In contrast, the rural indigenous community concentrated on the housing design. In both projects, the occupants were encouraged to be the key actors and to decentralize the solution finding process. The outcome of workshops generated the activities and possible solutions that respect the need for the stakeholders and motivate them to continue to be active.","PeriodicalId":36071,"journal":{"name":"Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54028/nj2019177180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper compares two contrasting processes of low-income community design in rural and urban areas in Thailand. The low-income Srabot community in the urban area is constructing a new settlement on newly purchased land. In parallel, the indigenous Banggloy community is located in the National Park as a community who were forcibly evicted from their village home to an allocated area where they constructed dwellings in the new village. Both cases were supported by housing loans and funding from the Thai Community Organizations Development Institute (CODI)1. The aim of this paper is to examine collaborative learning process based on low-income community design. Both cases employed participatory housing and planning design workshops. The urban community focused on designing the community masterplan. In contrast, the rural indigenous community concentrated on the housing design. In both projects, the occupants were encouraged to be the key actors and to decentralize the solution finding process. The outcome of workshops generated the activities and possible solutions that respect the need for the stakeholders and motivate them to continue to be active.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泰国农村和城市住区的协作社区设计过程
本文比较了泰国农村和城市低收入社区设计的两个对比过程。城市地区低收入的斯拉博特社区正在新购买的土地上建设一个新的定居点。与此同时,位于国家公园的土著邦格罗伊社区作为一个社区,被强行从他们的村庄家园驱逐到一个分配的区域,在那里他们在新村建造了住房。这两个项目都得到了住房贷款和泰国社区组织发展研究所的资助。本文的目的是研究基于低收入社区设计的协作学习过程。这两个案例都采用了参与式住房和规划设计工作坊。城市社区重点设计社区总体规划。相比之下,农村土著社区则侧重于房屋设计。在这两个项目中,居住者被鼓励成为关键角色,并分散解决方案寻找过程。讲习班的成果产生了尊重利益相关者需求的活动和可能的解决方案,并激励他们继续积极参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Indonesian Government’s Role in Setting Renewable Energy Targets to Reduce GHG Emissions from the Electrical Energy Sector Applying the A-Kano Model to assess the impact of common area elements on customers’ perceptions of subdivision housing projects in metropolitan Bangkok Urban Policy Supporting Cultural Adequacy in Nang Loeng, Bangkok Transforming Adversity Into Opportunity: Assessing User Satisfaction in Hospital Transformation in Lieu of a Pandemic Through the Multi-Corridor Expansion Model for Epidemic Management and Environmental Design Enhancement Perception of Overall Quality of Life Among Occupants of Green and Non-Green Office Buildings in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1