Assessing a Nation’s Competitiveness in Global Food Innovation: Creating a Global Food Innovation Index

Sylvain Charlebois, Amy Hill, Janèle Vézeau, Lydia Hunsberger, Maddy Johnston, J. Music
{"title":"Assessing a Nation’s Competitiveness in Global Food Innovation: Creating a Global Food Innovation Index","authors":"Sylvain Charlebois, Amy Hill, Janèle Vézeau, Lydia Hunsberger, Maddy Johnston, J. Music","doi":"10.3390/world3010002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While food innovation is heavily influenced by the myriad of policies, regulations and other environmental factors within a country, globalization means that food innovation is also a matter of international competitiveness. This benchmarking exercise uses 24 variables to compare the different innovation environments across ten countries: Canada, the US, Mexico, the UK, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Japan, and Australia. Quantitative and qualitative data was collected from publicly available sources only to measure each variable and ultimately provide a ranking. Qualitative data was evaluated using thematic coding to establish baseline practices and then compare each country to the baseline. Quantitative data was evaluated by constructing an average to which each country was compared. Countries whose data showed they met the average were awarded two points, and those who performed above or below average were either awarded an additional point or saw a point deducted. A final ranking was established from the scores across all four pillars, and the ranking was weighted to account for lacking data. The final weighted ranking saw the UK rank first, followed by the US, Germany, Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, Japan, Mexico, France and finally, Italy in tenth place.","PeriodicalId":49307,"journal":{"name":"Microlithography World","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microlithography World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/world3010002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While food innovation is heavily influenced by the myriad of policies, regulations and other environmental factors within a country, globalization means that food innovation is also a matter of international competitiveness. This benchmarking exercise uses 24 variables to compare the different innovation environments across ten countries: Canada, the US, Mexico, the UK, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Japan, and Australia. Quantitative and qualitative data was collected from publicly available sources only to measure each variable and ultimately provide a ranking. Qualitative data was evaluated using thematic coding to establish baseline practices and then compare each country to the baseline. Quantitative data was evaluated by constructing an average to which each country was compared. Countries whose data showed they met the average were awarded two points, and those who performed above or below average were either awarded an additional point or saw a point deducted. A final ranking was established from the scores across all four pillars, and the ranking was weighted to account for lacking data. The final weighted ranking saw the UK rank first, followed by the US, Germany, Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, Japan, Mexico, France and finally, Italy in tenth place.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估一个国家在全球食品创新中的竞争力:创建一个全球食品创新指数
虽然食品创新在很大程度上受到一个国家内无数政策、法规和其他环境因素的影响,但全球化意味着食品创新也是一个国际竞争力问题。这项基准测试使用24个变量来比较10个国家不同的创新环境:加拿大、美国、墨西哥、英国、法国、德国、意大利、荷兰、日本和澳大利亚。从公开来源收集定量和定性数据仅用于测量每个变量并最终提供排名。使用专题编码对定性数据进行评估,以建立基线做法,然后将每个国家与基线进行比较。定量数据通过构建一个平均值来评估,并与每个国家进行比较。数据显示达到平均水平的国家被加两分,高于或低于平均水平的国家要么被加一分,要么被扣一分。最终的排名是根据所有四个支柱的得分来确定的,并对排名进行加权,以考虑数据的缺乏。在最终的加权排名中,英国排名第一,其次是美国、德国、澳大利亚、加拿大、荷兰、日本、墨西哥、法国,最后是意大利,排名第十。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Demand-Side Actors in Agricultural Supply Chain Sustainability: An Assessment of Motivations for Action, Implementation Challenges, and Research Frontiers Demographic Delusions: World Population Growth Is Exceeding Most Projections and Jeopardising Scenarios for Sustainable Futures Riverbank Erosion and Rural Food Security in Bangladesh The Human Ecology of Overshoot: Why a Major ‘Population Correction’ Is Inevitable Carbon-Neutrality Research in China—Trends and Emerging Themes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1