Scientific publications as an element of evaluation of scientific output in Poland

Rafał Dowgier, Urszula K. Zawadzka-Pąk
{"title":"Scientific publications as an element of evaluation of scientific output in Poland","authors":"Rafał Dowgier, Urszula K. Zawadzka-Pąk","doi":"10.15290/ACR.2016.09.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The evaluation of scientific output of people who conduct such research activity can be made according to different criteria and in different dimensions in the Polish legal system. Most importantly, it needs to be indicated that there are distinct evaluation rules for individual research activity conducted for promotion (Ph.D., postdoctoral titles, professorships), for competitions connected with gaining finances for research projects or for assessing institutions employing such people (categorisation and parametrisation of research institutes). In the first case, detailed rules of evaluation made for academic degrees and titles are regulated by the act of 14 March 2003 on academic degrees and academic title and degrees and title in art.1 On the other hand, the evaluation of research institutes is made based on the criteria specified both in the act of 30 April 2010 on the principle of financing science2, as well as in the executive orders to the act.3 Other regulations are binding in evaluation of people who apply for grants for research projects. In majority they are granted through competitions by National Science Centre operating on the basis of the act of 30 April 2010 on the National Science Centre4. Besides evaluation criteria of applications connected with the quality of financed research also scientific achievements of the applicants are included and are assessed through scientific publications.","PeriodicalId":7334,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Computing Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"30-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Computing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15290/ACR.2016.09.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction The evaluation of scientific output of people who conduct such research activity can be made according to different criteria and in different dimensions in the Polish legal system. Most importantly, it needs to be indicated that there are distinct evaluation rules for individual research activity conducted for promotion (Ph.D., postdoctoral titles, professorships), for competitions connected with gaining finances for research projects or for assessing institutions employing such people (categorisation and parametrisation of research institutes). In the first case, detailed rules of evaluation made for academic degrees and titles are regulated by the act of 14 March 2003 on academic degrees and academic title and degrees and title in art.1 On the other hand, the evaluation of research institutes is made based on the criteria specified both in the act of 30 April 2010 on the principle of financing science2, as well as in the executive orders to the act.3 Other regulations are binding in evaluation of people who apply for grants for research projects. In majority they are granted through competitions by National Science Centre operating on the basis of the act of 30 April 2010 on the National Science Centre4. Besides evaluation criteria of applications connected with the quality of financed research also scientific achievements of the applicants are included and are assessed through scientific publications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学出版物作为评价波兰科学产出的一个要素
在波兰法律体系中,对从事此类研究活动的人的科学成果的评估可以根据不同的标准和不同的维度进行。最重要的是,需要指出的是,对于为晋升而进行的个人研究活动(博士、博士后头衔、教授职位)、与获得研究项目资金有关的竞争或评估雇用这些人的机构(研究机构的分类和参数化),都有不同的评估规则。在第一种情况下,学位和头衔的详细评估规则由2003年3月14日关于学位和头衔以及第1条中关于学位和头衔的法案规定另一方面,对研究机构的评估是根据2010年4月30日关于资助科学原则的法案2以及该法案的行政命令中规定的标准进行的其他法规在评估申请研究项目资助的人员时也具有约束力。其中大多数是由国家科学中心根据2010年4月30日关于国家科学中心的法案通过竞赛授予的。除了与资助研究的质量有关的申请的评估标准外,还包括申请人的科学成就,并通过科学出版物进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advances in Computing: 16th Colombian Congress, CCC 2022, Armenia, Colombia, October 17–21, 2022, Revised Selected Papers Advances in Computing: 15th Colombian Congress, CCC 2021, Bogotá, Colombia, November 22–26, 2021, Revised Selected Papers Effect of Convective Mixing Process on Storage of CO2 in Saline Aquifers with Layered Permeability Synthesis of Tris(arylphosphite)-ligated Cobalt(0) Complexes [Co2(CO)6{P(OAr)3}2], and their Reactivity towards Phenylacetylene and Diphenylacetylene A Concomitant Allergic Fungal Otomastoiditis with an Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1