The post-colonial is neocolonial in the Indian Ocean region: the case of Chagos seen through the African-centred decolonial theoretical lens

IF 0.2 Q4 AREA STUDIES Africa Review Pub Date : 2020-05-13 DOI:10.1080/09744053.2020.1754677
Siphamandla Zondi
{"title":"The post-colonial is neocolonial in the Indian Ocean region: the case of Chagos seen through the African-centred decolonial theoretical lens","authors":"Siphamandla Zondi","doi":"10.1080/09744053.2020.1754677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The status of the Chagos Island remains a subject of struggle in international relations pitting the United Kingdom and, by extension, the U.S. against the indigenous people of the Chagos who were forcibly displaced and exiled in order to accommodate a U.S. military base involved in evil conflicts in the lands of the Orient. Mauritius joined this struggle on the basis that the islands were separated from Mauritius by the British on the eve of independence in 1968. The Chagosians have for decades insisted on their right to self-determination and their right to return to the land of their ancestors, taking their battles to the streets of London and international courts. In spite of the growing support for their cause around the world and although they have scored some victories in courts and at the United Nations, their dreams remain deferred as the U.K. and the U.S. refuse to act justly and fairly. This is a classic case of neocolonial continuities that haunt post-colonial Africa, rendering independence meaningless for injustice anywhere in Africa is injustice against the whole of Africa. This paper suggests that the use of a decolonial lens of analysis infused with African anti-colonial perspectives enables us to understand the fundamental problems facing the Chagosians and to think of more permanent solutions to this quagmire.","PeriodicalId":41966,"journal":{"name":"Africa Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09744053.2020.1754677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The status of the Chagos Island remains a subject of struggle in international relations pitting the United Kingdom and, by extension, the U.S. against the indigenous people of the Chagos who were forcibly displaced and exiled in order to accommodate a U.S. military base involved in evil conflicts in the lands of the Orient. Mauritius joined this struggle on the basis that the islands were separated from Mauritius by the British on the eve of independence in 1968. The Chagosians have for decades insisted on their right to self-determination and their right to return to the land of their ancestors, taking their battles to the streets of London and international courts. In spite of the growing support for their cause around the world and although they have scored some victories in courts and at the United Nations, their dreams remain deferred as the U.K. and the U.S. refuse to act justly and fairly. This is a classic case of neocolonial continuities that haunt post-colonial Africa, rendering independence meaningless for injustice anywhere in Africa is injustice against the whole of Africa. This paper suggests that the use of a decolonial lens of analysis infused with African anti-colonial perspectives enables us to understand the fundamental problems facing the Chagosians and to think of more permanent solutions to this quagmire.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度洋地区的后殖民主义是新殖民主义:查戈斯群岛的案例是通过以非洲为中心的非殖民主义理论视角来看的
查戈斯岛的地位仍然是国际关系中斗争的主题,使英国和美国与查戈斯群岛的土著人民进行斗争,这些土著人民被迫流离失所和流亡,以容纳美国在东方土地上参与邪恶冲突的军事基地。毛里求斯加入这场斗争的基础是,这些岛屿是在1968年独立前夕被英国人从毛里求斯分离出来的。几十年来,查戈斯人一直坚持他们的自决权和返回祖先土地的权利,将他们的斗争推向伦敦街头和国际法庭。尽管他们的事业在世界各地得到越来越多的支持,尽管他们在法庭和联合国取得了一些胜利,但由于英国和美国拒绝采取公正和公平的行动,他们的梦想仍然被推迟。这是新殖民主义继续困扰后殖民非洲的一个典型例子,使独立变得毫无意义,因为非洲任何地方的不公正都是对整个非洲的不公正。本文认为,运用非殖民主义的分析视角,结合非洲反殖民主义的观点,使我们能够理解查戈斯人面临的根本问题,并为这一困境想出更持久的解决办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Africa Review
Africa Review AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Africa Review is an interdisciplinary academic journal of the African Studies Association of India (ASA India) and focuses on theoretical, historical, literary and developmental enquiries related to African affairs. The central aim of the journal is to promote a scholarly understanding of developments and change in Africa, publishing both original scholarship on developments in individual countries as well as comparative analyses examining the wider region. The journal serves the full spectrum of social science disciplinary communities, including anthropology, archaeology, history, law, sociology, demography, development studies, economics, education, gender studies, industrial relations, literature, politics and urban studies.
期刊最新文献
Artistic Resistance and Resilience in Sank, or the Patience of the Dead, by Aristide Tarnagda Good Morning, Mr. Mandela: A Memoir, by Zelda La Grange The House on Butterfly Street, by Mhani Alaoui What Makes a Terrorist Tick in Al Aswany’s The Yacoubian Building? Africa: Colonizers’ Unpaid Debt, by Irina Abramova (ed)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1