Bioarchaeology in Central Asia: Growing from Legacies to Enhance Future Research

Q3 Arts and Humanities Translocal Chinese: East Asian Perspectives Pub Date : 2022-07-08 DOI:10.1353/asi.2022.0019
Elissa A Bullion, Zhuldyz Tashmanbetova, A. R. Ventresca Miller
{"title":"Bioarchaeology in Central Asia: Growing from Legacies to Enhance Future Research","authors":"Elissa A Bullion, Zhuldyz Tashmanbetova, A. R. Ventresca Miller","doi":"10.1353/asi.2022.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We review the historical trajectory of bioarchaeology in Central Asia to draw attention to the importance of previous archaeological and biological anthropology research that pioneered large scale systematic excavation and use of technology such as aerial photography. We highlight the political and social biases of past work and how its legacy continues to shape modern practices. We are interested in bringing these dynamics to the attention of western scholars who are increasingly focusing on Central Asian samples for research. Political ideologies, especially during the Soviet period, shaped the study of populations in Central Asia, including centering ethnogenesis as an enduring focus. Current research requires careful work by scholars to contextualize human remains within social and theoretical models of the past that continue to shape everything from access to collections to the organization of departments. Advances in molecular methods have led to an increase in studies of human remains, often focusing on panregional social, dietary, and genetic changes. However, these studies often have small sample sizes and are thinly distributed across the vast expanse of Central Asia. Researchers conducting bioarchaeological research should concentrate on the documentation of biological and material culture at the micro-regional scale to build up models of broader social processes from the bottom-up. Finally, ethical bioarchaeology in the region requires that the contributions of Central Asian scholars past and present be acknowledged and centered, and that training, research, and publication opportunities be provided for Central Asian scholars and communities.","PeriodicalId":36318,"journal":{"name":"Translocal Chinese: East Asian Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translocal Chinese: East Asian Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/asi.2022.0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We review the historical trajectory of bioarchaeology in Central Asia to draw attention to the importance of previous archaeological and biological anthropology research that pioneered large scale systematic excavation and use of technology such as aerial photography. We highlight the political and social biases of past work and how its legacy continues to shape modern practices. We are interested in bringing these dynamics to the attention of western scholars who are increasingly focusing on Central Asian samples for research. Political ideologies, especially during the Soviet period, shaped the study of populations in Central Asia, including centering ethnogenesis as an enduring focus. Current research requires careful work by scholars to contextualize human remains within social and theoretical models of the past that continue to shape everything from access to collections to the organization of departments. Advances in molecular methods have led to an increase in studies of human remains, often focusing on panregional social, dietary, and genetic changes. However, these studies often have small sample sizes and are thinly distributed across the vast expanse of Central Asia. Researchers conducting bioarchaeological research should concentrate on the documentation of biological and material culture at the micro-regional scale to build up models of broader social processes from the bottom-up. Finally, ethical bioarchaeology in the region requires that the contributions of Central Asian scholars past and present be acknowledged and centered, and that training, research, and publication opportunities be provided for Central Asian scholars and communities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中亚生物考古学:从遗产中成长以加强未来研究
我们回顾了中亚生物考古学的历史轨迹,以提请注意以前的考古和生物人类学研究的重要性,这些研究开创了大规模系统挖掘和使用航空摄影等技术。我们强调了过去工作的政治和社会偏见,以及它的遗产如何继续塑造现代实践。我们有兴趣将这些动态引起西方学者的注意,他们越来越关注中亚样本进行研究。政治意识形态,特别是在苏联时期,塑造了中亚人口的研究,包括将民族起源作为一个持久的焦点。目前的研究需要学者们仔细的工作,将人类遗骸置于过去的社会和理论模型的背景下,这些模型继续塑造着从藏品的获取到部门组织的一切。分子方法的进步导致了人类遗骸研究的增加,通常集中在全区域的社会、饮食和遗传变化上。然而,这些研究的样本量往往很小,而且分布在中亚广阔的地区。进行生物考古研究的研究人员应该集中精力在微观区域尺度上记录生物和物质文化,自下而上地建立更广泛的社会过程模型。最后,该地区的伦理生物考古学需要承认和关注中亚学者过去和现在的贡献,并为中亚学者和社区提供培训、研究和出版机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Translocal Chinese: East Asian Perspectives
Translocal Chinese: East Asian Perspectives Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Chinese Space, Identity, and Presence in Malaysia: Exploring the Yingxiong Haohan Ideal of Wu Masculinity in the Wangkang Festival of Melaka Introduction: Evolving “Chineseness”: from Politics and Economy to Cultural Heritage Cold War Elements: a Discussion on the Influence of the Cold War on the Communist Party of Malaya from 1948 to 1989 The Logic of Tong (Togetherness) or Why Guanxi Works in Chinese Societies? Does China Matter to the Chinese Overseas? A Case Study of Malaysian Chinese Businesses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1