The Profile of Scientific Literacy and Self-Concept in Learning Physics

Sheila Fitriana, Tuti Hardianti, Syahwin Syahwin
{"title":"The Profile of Scientific Literacy and Self-Concept in Learning Physics","authors":"Sheila Fitriana, Tuti Hardianti, Syahwin Syahwin","doi":"10.20527/jipf.v7i1.7025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the findings of interviews and preliminary observations, there are various issues with learning physics, including the continued use of the expository approach and a reliance on the capacity to recall topics without comprehending their significance. This study aimed to characterize the profile of students' scientific literacy and self-concept. The descriptive research approach was employed in this study, with a single case design. Learning observation sheets, interview sheets, scientific literacy tests, and student self-concept surveys were utilized as study instruments. The quantitative data acquired from questionnaires and tests in this study will be examined descriptively by percentage. Students' scientific literacy abilities are still rather low in general. Competency domain indicators for explaining scientific phenomena are in the medium category, obtaining a percentage of 78%, while competency domain indicators for evaluating and designing scientific investigations are in a low category, obtaining a percentage of 58%, and competency domain indicators for interpreting data and scientific evidence are in the deficient category, obtaining a percentage of only 46%. Students' attitudes toward learning physics are rated as modest. Based on the outcomes of this study, more in-depth research utilizing appropriate learning models is required to monitor success in physics learning and develop students' scientific literacy abilities. ","PeriodicalId":31460,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika AlBiruni","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika AlBiruni","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v7i1.7025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the findings of interviews and preliminary observations, there are various issues with learning physics, including the continued use of the expository approach and a reliance on the capacity to recall topics without comprehending their significance. This study aimed to characterize the profile of students' scientific literacy and self-concept. The descriptive research approach was employed in this study, with a single case design. Learning observation sheets, interview sheets, scientific literacy tests, and student self-concept surveys were utilized as study instruments. The quantitative data acquired from questionnaires and tests in this study will be examined descriptively by percentage. Students' scientific literacy abilities are still rather low in general. Competency domain indicators for explaining scientific phenomena are in the medium category, obtaining a percentage of 78%, while competency domain indicators for evaluating and designing scientific investigations are in a low category, obtaining a percentage of 58%, and competency domain indicators for interpreting data and scientific evidence are in the deficient category, obtaining a percentage of only 46%. Students' attitudes toward learning physics are rated as modest. Based on the outcomes of this study, more in-depth research utilizing appropriate learning models is required to monitor success in physics learning and develop students' scientific literacy abilities. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物理学习中的科学素养与自我概念
根据访谈和初步观察的结果,学习物理存在各种各样的问题,包括继续使用说明性方法和依赖回忆主题的能力而不理解其重要性。本研究旨在探讨学生科学素养和自我概念的特征。本研究采用描述性研究方法,采用单一案例设计。学习观察表、访谈表、科学素养测试和学生自我概念调查作为研究工具。本研究中从问卷调查和测试中获得的定量数据将按百分比进行描述性检验。学生的科学素养水平总体上还比较低。解释科学现象的胜任力领域指标处于中等水平,占比78%;评价和设计科学调查的胜任力领域指标处于较低水平,占比58%;解释数据和科学证据的胜任力领域指标处于不足水平,占比仅为46%。学生对学习物理的态度一般。基于本研究的结果,需要更深入的研究,利用适当的学习模式来监测物理学习的成功,培养学生的科学素养能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploration of Increasing Students’ Critical Thinking in the Guided Discovery Learning Model on Light Waves An Analysis of Learning Styles on Renewable Energy Material in Independent Curriculum for Differentiation Learning REACT Learning on the Topic of Elasticity to Enhance Students' Analytical Abilities The Effect of Ethnoscience-Based Science Environment Technology Society (SETS) Learning Model in Learning Physics and Biology Is 21st Century Learning Need STEM Approach built into Physics Comics?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1