Introduction to the Epistemology of Testimony

Q4 Arts and Humanities Argumenta Philosophica Pub Date : 2006-01-02 DOI:10.21825/philosophica.82188
D. O’Brien
{"title":"Introduction to the Epistemology of Testimony","authors":"D. O’Brien","doi":"10.21825/philosophica.82188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spoken and written testimony pervades much of our life. I hear the announcement that the train is delayed, I read that Philip Roth has published another novel, and one’s partner can tell you that she loves you. A good deal of our knowledge would appear to be testimonial knowledge – perhaps most. Curiously, though, until fairly recently philosophers did not often concern themselves with this way of acquiring knowledge, and it was thought that one should be suspicious of beliefs acquired in this way. To know something one must be able to reason it through for oneself, or perceive it oneself, and not just acquire it secondhand from someone else. Here is Locke expressing this “individualist” approach to knowledge.","PeriodicalId":36843,"journal":{"name":"Argumenta Philosophica","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argumenta Philosophica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Spoken and written testimony pervades much of our life. I hear the announcement that the train is delayed, I read that Philip Roth has published another novel, and one’s partner can tell you that she loves you. A good deal of our knowledge would appear to be testimonial knowledge – perhaps most. Curiously, though, until fairly recently philosophers did not often concern themselves with this way of acquiring knowledge, and it was thought that one should be suspicious of beliefs acquired in this way. To know something one must be able to reason it through for oneself, or perceive it oneself, and not just acquire it secondhand from someone else. Here is Locke expressing this “individualist” approach to knowledge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
证言认识论导论
口头和书面的证词在我们的生活中无处不在。我听到广播说火车晚点了,我读到菲利普·罗斯(Philip Roth)又出版了一部小说,你的伴侣会对你说她爱你。我们的许多知识似乎都是证言性的知识——也许是大多数。然而,奇怪的是,直到最近,哲学家们才经常关心这种获取知识的方式,人们认为人们应该对以这种方式获得的信仰持怀疑态度。要了解一件事,一个人必须能够自己推理,或者自己感知,而不仅仅是从别人那里二手地获得它。这里是洛克表达这种“个人主义”的知识方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Argumenta Philosophica
Argumenta Philosophica Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Naturalisme et scepticisme Naturalismo e cosmopolitismo nell’Antichità Il naturalismo oggi Onnipotenza divina e ordine naturale nel Medioevo La natura e gli stati abituali nell’Etica Nicomachea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1