Invisible Women, 1983–2021

IF 0.4 3区 社会学 Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2021-07-22 DOI:10.1353/hlq.2021.0001
Margaret J. M. Ezell
{"title":"Invisible Women, 1983–2021","authors":"Margaret J. M. Ezell","doi":"10.1353/hlq.2021.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"• One of the many pleasures of attending a symposium1 where there are no concurrent sessions is the natural, ongoing conversations that arise over its course as panelists connect with each other about their topics, about the challenges of their work, and about the strategies for negotiating them. While many of the writers discussed in the “Women in Book History” symposium were already familiar to me— from Elizabeth Montagu, Charlotte Smith, Eliza Haywood, and Frances Burney to Dorothy Wordsworth and Mary Wollstonecraft—I also encountered what one speaker termed “a multitude of stars,” also called by some “obscure women”: women known only to their family circle or their immediate social group. At this symposium, I was the wrap-up speaker in the program; as I listened, I found myself recalling and reflecting on some of my own first encounters some thirty years ago with obscure women writers, evolving methodologies, and our findings back then. In 1983, the year after I began teaching in an American university, the feminist scholar and science fiction writer Joanna Russ (1937–2011) published How to Suppress Women’s Writing. Highlighted by its witty cover art (fig. 1) was the book’s ironic attack on the ways in which British and American women’s writing—and, by extension, the writing of any marginalized social group—had been systematically explained away. These strategies ranged from denial of agency (women didn’t write back then) to declassification (she wrote it, but it’s not “art”) to diminution (she wrote it, but she had help; or she wrote it, but it isn’t any good). The overall effect was to weave a veil of unexamined beliefs about women and other marginalized writers and their writing that, if it did not indeed suppress them, rendered the people and their","PeriodicalId":45445,"journal":{"name":"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY","volume":"57 1","pages":"12 - 5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hlq.2021.0001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

• One of the many pleasures of attending a symposium1 where there are no concurrent sessions is the natural, ongoing conversations that arise over its course as panelists connect with each other about their topics, about the challenges of their work, and about the strategies for negotiating them. While many of the writers discussed in the “Women in Book History” symposium were already familiar to me— from Elizabeth Montagu, Charlotte Smith, Eliza Haywood, and Frances Burney to Dorothy Wordsworth and Mary Wollstonecraft—I also encountered what one speaker termed “a multitude of stars,” also called by some “obscure women”: women known only to their family circle or their immediate social group. At this symposium, I was the wrap-up speaker in the program; as I listened, I found myself recalling and reflecting on some of my own first encounters some thirty years ago with obscure women writers, evolving methodologies, and our findings back then. In 1983, the year after I began teaching in an American university, the feminist scholar and science fiction writer Joanna Russ (1937–2011) published How to Suppress Women’s Writing. Highlighted by its witty cover art (fig. 1) was the book’s ironic attack on the ways in which British and American women’s writing—and, by extension, the writing of any marginalized social group—had been systematically explained away. These strategies ranged from denial of agency (women didn’t write back then) to declassification (she wrote it, but it’s not “art”) to diminution (she wrote it, but she had help; or she wrote it, but it isn’t any good). The overall effect was to weave a veil of unexamined beliefs about women and other marginalized writers and their writing that, if it did not indeed suppress them, rendered the people and their
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
看不见的女人,1983-2021
•参加一个没有同期会议的研讨会的乐趣之一是,当小组成员就他们的主题、工作中的挑战以及谈判策略相互联系时,在整个过程中出现的自然的、持续的对话。在“图书史上的女性”研讨会上讨论的许多作家我都很熟悉——从伊丽莎白·蒙塔古、夏洛特·史密斯、伊丽莎·海伍德、弗朗西丝·伯尼到多萝西·华兹华斯和玛丽·沃斯通克拉夫特——我也遇到了一位演讲者所说的“众多明星”,也被一些“默默无闻的女性”称为:只有她们的家庭圈子或直接的社会群体知道的女性。在这次研讨会上,我是项目的总结性发言人;听着听着,我发现自己在回忆和反思大约30年前我第一次与一些不知名的女作家接触的情况,不断发展的方法,以及我们当时的发现。1983年,也就是我开始在美国一所大学教书的第二年,女权主义学者、科幻作家乔安娜·拉斯(Joanna Russ, 1937-2011)出版了《如何压制女性写作》。诙谐的封面艺术(图1)突出了这本书对英美女性写作方式的讽刺攻击,进而延伸到任何边缘化社会群体的写作方式,这些方式被系统地解释了。这些策略包括否认代理(当时女性不写作),解密(她写了,但这不是“艺术”),贬低(她写了,但她得到了帮助;或者是她写的,但写得不好)。总体效果是编织了一层关于女性和其他边缘化作家及其作品的未经检验的信念的面纱,如果它没有真正压制他们,那么它就会使人民和他们的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY
HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"That Dreadful Distemper": Smallpox, Quakers, and Inoculation in Enlightenment Britain The Annotations in the 1525 Ptolemy in the Huntington Library: The Continuing Influence of Martin Waldseemüller's World Map of 1507 Jonson's Imaginary Library: "An Execration upon Vulcan" and Its Intertexts Unwresting the Past: The Poetics and Politics of Samuel Daniel's 1595 Civil Wars A Tudor Family Library: Social Ambition and Continental Books in Sir Michael Dormer's Donation to the Bodleian Library
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1