Linda Nesse, M. T. Gonzalez, G. Aamodt, R. K. Raanaas
{"title":"Recovery, quality of life and issues in supported housing among residents with co-occurring problems: a cross-sectional study","authors":"Linda Nesse, M. T. Gonzalez, G. Aamodt, R. K. Raanaas","doi":"10.1108/add-10-2019-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recovery for residents who experience co-occurring problems and live in supported housing takes place in everyday contexts. This study aims to explore residents’ self-reported recovery and quality of life and examine the relationships between these factors and issues in supported housing.,A cross-sectional study was conducted at 21 supported housing sites in six cities across Norway. A total of 104 residents (76 men and 28 women) responded to measures of recovery (Recovery Assessment Scale – Revised), life satisfaction (Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life), affect (single items), staff support (Brief INSPIRE) and sense of home (single items).,Linear regression analyses indicated associations between recovery and staff support (B = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.01-0.02, s = 0.39), housing satisfaction (B = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.07-0.22, s = 0.38), sense of home (B = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.14-0.32, s = 0.49) and satisfaction with personal economy (B = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.05-0.17, s = 0.33). Similarly, associations were found between life satisfaction and staff support (B = 0.03, 95% CI = 0.02-0.04, s = 0.46), housing satisfaction (B = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.46-0.80, s = 0.60), sense of home (B = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.42-0.87, s = 0.51) and satisfaction with personal economy (B = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.19-0.50, s = 0.39).,The findings imply that core issues in supported housing, namely, staff support, housing satisfaction, sense of home and satisfaction with personal economy, are associated with recovery and quality of life.","PeriodicalId":51922,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Dual Diagnosis","volume":"8 1","pages":"73-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/add-10-2019-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
Recovery for residents who experience co-occurring problems and live in supported housing takes place in everyday contexts. This study aims to explore residents’ self-reported recovery and quality of life and examine the relationships between these factors and issues in supported housing.,A cross-sectional study was conducted at 21 supported housing sites in six cities across Norway. A total of 104 residents (76 men and 28 women) responded to measures of recovery (Recovery Assessment Scale – Revised), life satisfaction (Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life), affect (single items), staff support (Brief INSPIRE) and sense of home (single items).,Linear regression analyses indicated associations between recovery and staff support (B = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.01-0.02, s = 0.39), housing satisfaction (B = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.07-0.22, s = 0.38), sense of home (B = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.14-0.32, s = 0.49) and satisfaction with personal economy (B = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.05-0.17, s = 0.33). Similarly, associations were found between life satisfaction and staff support (B = 0.03, 95% CI = 0.02-0.04, s = 0.46), housing satisfaction (B = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.46-0.80, s = 0.60), sense of home (B = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.42-0.87, s = 0.51) and satisfaction with personal economy (B = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.19-0.50, s = 0.39).,The findings imply that core issues in supported housing, namely, staff support, housing satisfaction, sense of home and satisfaction with personal economy, are associated with recovery and quality of life.
对于那些经历共同发生的问题并住在支持住房中的居民来说,康复是在日常环境中进行的。本研究旨在探讨居民自我报告的康复和生活质量,并探讨这些因素与保障性住房问题之间的关系。一项横断面研究在挪威六个城市的21个受支持的住房地点进行。共有104名居民(76名男性和28名女性)对恢复措施(恢复评估量表-修订),生活满意度(曼彻斯特生活质量短期评估),影响(单项),工作人员支持(Brief INSPIRE)和家的感觉(单项)做出了回应。线性回归分析表明,恢复与员工支持(B = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.01-0.02, s = 0.39)、住房满意度(B = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.07-0.22, s = 0.38)、家的感觉(B = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.14-0.32, s = 0.49)和个人经济满意度(B = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.05-0.17, s = 0.33)相关。同样,生活满意度与员工支持(B = 0.03, 95% CI = 0.02-0.04, s = 0.46)、住房满意度(B = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.46-0.80, s = 0.60)、家的感觉(B = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.42-0.87, s = 0.51)和个人经济满意度(B = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.19-0.50, s = 0.39)之间存在关联。研究结果表明,支持性住房的核心问题,即工作人员支持、住房满意度、家的感觉和个人经济满意度,与康复和生活质量有关。