Comparison of two insulin injection methods on control of type 2 diabetes; is the new protocol effective or not?

M. Bayani, Hojjat Ghorbani, R. Akbari
{"title":"Comparison of two insulin injection methods on control of type 2 diabetes; is the new protocol effective or not?","authors":"M. Bayani, Hojjat Ghorbani, R. Akbari","doi":"10.34172/jre.2021.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Type 2 diabetes is a progressive disease with a significant risk for developing late complications. Objectives: This study aimed to determine if the discharge NPH and regular insulin doses of conventional insulin therapy protocol in which optimal glycemic control can be achieved are similar to NPH and regular insulin doses at beginning of the insulin protocol or not. In other words, we aimed to compare two insulin injection methods on the control of type 2 diabetes. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on hospital records of type II diabetic patients admitted for insulin therapy with the conventional protocol from 2008-2013. Treatment was initiated with the following proportions; morning NPH: 44%, morning regular dosage: 22%, evening NPH dosage: 17% and evening regular dosage: 17%. Insulin doses of the discharge day in which optimal glycemic control has been achieved were recorded and based on their mean, a protocol was made. Finally, two groups were categorized. Group 1 consisted of patients whose discharge insulin dose was in the range of the mean data of the study (±2 IU/mL) and patients whose discharge insulin dose was in accordance with the conventional protocol (±2 IU/mL) participated in group 2. Results: At discharge day, the mean morning NPH dose was 34.2±6.69, morning regular: 23.8±6.36, evening NPH: 21.26±6.75 and evening regular: 20.74±5.51. The discharge insulin ratios of the conventional protocol were similar to that of the admission ratios in only 17.7% of the patients. Only 34.5% of the patients could include in the new protocol and 50% of them didn’t fit any protocol. Conclusion: It is suggested to inject one-third of the total daily insulin need as NPH in the morning and divide the remained two-thirds between morning regular, evening NPH and evening regular equally. This may decrease the length of hospital stay and decrease the time to reach the desired glycemic control.","PeriodicalId":16964,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Renal Endocrinology","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Renal Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jre.2021.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Type 2 diabetes is a progressive disease with a significant risk for developing late complications. Objectives: This study aimed to determine if the discharge NPH and regular insulin doses of conventional insulin therapy protocol in which optimal glycemic control can be achieved are similar to NPH and regular insulin doses at beginning of the insulin protocol or not. In other words, we aimed to compare two insulin injection methods on the control of type 2 diabetes. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on hospital records of type II diabetic patients admitted for insulin therapy with the conventional protocol from 2008-2013. Treatment was initiated with the following proportions; morning NPH: 44%, morning regular dosage: 22%, evening NPH dosage: 17% and evening regular dosage: 17%. Insulin doses of the discharge day in which optimal glycemic control has been achieved were recorded and based on their mean, a protocol was made. Finally, two groups were categorized. Group 1 consisted of patients whose discharge insulin dose was in the range of the mean data of the study (±2 IU/mL) and patients whose discharge insulin dose was in accordance with the conventional protocol (±2 IU/mL) participated in group 2. Results: At discharge day, the mean morning NPH dose was 34.2±6.69, morning regular: 23.8±6.36, evening NPH: 21.26±6.75 and evening regular: 20.74±5.51. The discharge insulin ratios of the conventional protocol were similar to that of the admission ratios in only 17.7% of the patients. Only 34.5% of the patients could include in the new protocol and 50% of them didn’t fit any protocol. Conclusion: It is suggested to inject one-third of the total daily insulin need as NPH in the morning and divide the remained two-thirds between morning regular, evening NPH and evening regular equally. This may decrease the length of hospital stay and decrease the time to reach the desired glycemic control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种胰岛素注射方式控制2型糖尿病的比较新方案是否有效?
2型糖尿病是一种进行性疾病,具有发生晚期并发症的显著风险。目的:本研究旨在确定常规胰岛素治疗方案的出院NPH和常规胰岛素剂量是否与胰岛素方案开始时的NPH和常规胰岛素剂量相似,以达到最佳血糖控制。换句话说,我们的目的是比较两种胰岛素注射方式对2型糖尿病的控制。患者和方法:本横断面研究对2008-2013年接受常规方案胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者的医院记录进行了研究。按以下比例开始治疗:早上NPH: 44%,早上常规剂量:22%,晚上NPH: 17%,晚上常规剂量:17%。记录出院当天达到最佳血糖控制的胰岛素剂量,并根据其平均值制定方案。最后分为两组。第一组为出院胰岛素剂量在研究平均数据范围内(±2 IU/mL)的患者,第二组为出院胰岛素剂量符合常规方案(±2 IU/mL)的患者。结果:出院当天,上午NPH平均值为34.2±6.69,早上正常:23.8±6.36,晚上NPH平均值为21.26±6.75,晚上正常:20.74±5.51。常规方案的出院胰岛素率与入院胰岛素率相似的患者仅为17.7%。只有34.5%的患者可以纳入新方案,50%的患者不符合任何方案。结论:建议每日胰岛素总需水量的三分之一在晨间注射作为NPH,其余三分之二在晨间、晚间和晚间平均分配。这可能减少住院时间,减少达到预期血糖控制的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contrast-induced acute kidney injury; possible ameliorative effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors Vitamin D and its role in health; A review of mechanisms, risk factors, sources, and health benefits New hopes on "SLU-PP-332" as an effective agent for weight loss with indirect kidney protection efficacy; a nephrology point of view Evaluation of the frequency of benign reactive lymphocytosis and lymphoproliferative disorders by flow cytometry in patients with persistent lymphocytosis in peripheral blood Cardiac alterations following radiation therapy in individuals with breast cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1