A special issue in honor of the late Professor Alex D. Bain (1948-2016)

IF 0.4 4区 化学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A Pub Date : 2018-04-29 DOI:10.1002/cmr.a.21421
William F. Reynolds PhD, Eugene P. Mazzola PhD, Roderick E. Wasylishen PhD
{"title":"A special issue in honor of the late Professor Alex D. Bain (1948-2016)","authors":"William F. Reynolds PhD,&nbsp;Eugene P. Mazzola PhD,&nbsp;Roderick E. Wasylishen PhD","doi":"10.1002/cmr.a.21421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The NMR community lost one of its most brilliant and original thinkers when Alex Bain died in late 2016. Many of his friends and former colleagues felt that Alex deserved some form of special recognition in view of his many contributions to NMR, both in Canada and elsewhere. Since Alex had published a number of important articles in <i>Concepts in Magnetic Resonance</i> and also served on the Editorial Board of Concepts, it was decided that a special issue of this journal in his honor would be an appropriate form of recognition of Alex's accomplishments, and three of us agreed to be Guest Editors for the issue.</p><p>Alex Bain graduated with a double Honors B.Sc. in Mathematics and Chemistry from the University of Toronto in 1970. He then received a National Research Council of Canada Fellowship for M.Sc. studies at the University of British Columbia where he carried out research on photoelectron spectroscopy. Next, he received a Shell Canada Fellowship for Ph.D. studies at Cambridge University. There he began his NMR career, working with Dr. Ruth Lynden-Bell. Returning to Canada in 1974, a time when full-time academic positions in Chemistry were few and far between, he first had an NRC Postdoctoral Fellowship with Professor John Martin at the University Alberta, followed by a series of limited term appointments at McMaster University and the Scarborough Campus of the University of Toronto. Finally, in 1980, Bruker Canada hired him as research scientist with particular responsibility for NMR programming, including for 2D NMR. He remained there until 1987 when McMaster attracted him back as an Associate Professor and later he became a Full Professor. In 2008, due to health concerns, he opted for early retirement to become an Emeritus Professor. However, he still kept very active in research, both at McMaster and as an unpaid research associate in Lewis Kay's group at Toronto. His contributions there are described in the article by Lewis.</p><p>Alex's research combined a strong desire to fully understand complex NMR phenomena with a knowledge and depth of understanding of advanced mathematical methods relevant to NMR that very few in the NMR community could match. Thus, use of Liouvillian operators, Floquet theory and sparse matrices featured prominently in his research. His Ph.D. research included elucidation of alternative relaxation pathways in heteronuclear AX<sub>2</sub> and AX<sub>3</sub> spin systems, knowledge that is still used today by Lewis Kay and others in designing 3D and 4D pulse sequences for protein NMR research. His Postdoctoral research included the use of Liouvillian operators to calculate NMR transitions. During his first spell at McMaster, he pioneered the use of Superspin to simulate 2D spectra. He also programmed a borrowed computer from a Nicolet FT-IR spectrometer to acquire and process 2D data on a Bruker spectrometer. This is what likely led to his job offer from Bruker. While at Bruker, he published a very useful paper describing a straightforward procedure for designing phase cycling for multi-pulse sequences. The continuing importance of this paper is well-described in the article by Lewis Kay.</p><p>After his return to McMaster, Alex focused on methods for highly accurate measurements of kinetic processes by NMR. This included development of a program, called MEXICO, which went beyond earlier programs by allowing analysis of multi-site exchange processes involving singlet peaks and two-site exchange between coupled spin systems. He also published a series of articles that provided a detailed understanding of the NMR and NQR spectra of quadrupolar nuclei. Finally, he also was fascinated by NMR exotica, such as the use of spin noise to generate an NMR spectrum without RF pulses. In addition to his own research, Alex was also very generous in sharing his expertise in NMR with McMaster colleagues, leading to many joint publications. This is well-described in the article by Giuseppe Mancini and co-authors from McMaster, along with a description of the many other ways that he contributed to life at McMaster. Alex was equally generous in providing help and advice to the broader NMR community, particularly on mathematical aspects of NMR.</p><p>Alex was a modest and very personable individual who particularly went out of his way to encourage younger scientists early in their careers. His modesty likely worked to his disadvantage in terms of wider recognition of his important work since he never boasted about or promoted his contributions to NMR. Nevertheless, those of us who were fortunate to know Alex well had tremendous respect for both him and his research. He is sorely missed.</p><p>My first interaction with Alex was in the spring term of 1966-67. Alex was enrolled in the first year of the Maths, Physics and Chemistry program at Toronto.</p><p>This was an extremely rigorous program that each year attracted about 300 of the top Science and Maths students from all over Ontario. The courses were far more advanced than typical first year University courses. At the start of that year, the Chemistry and Physics Departments had come up with an unusual arrangement for splitting teaching responsibilities, one that Physics later regretted. The agreement was that Physics would teach a course in Classical Mechanics while Chemistry taught a course in Quantum Mechanics. John Polanyi taught the first half of the Chemistry course, covering fairly hard-core quantum mechanics. I was surprised, as a very junior staff member, to be asked to give the second term lectures. I covered the approximation methods that chemists used at that time to describe structure and bonding for molecules. At the start of 1967-68, we were pleased to discover that more students than usual had opted for one of the Chemistry options in second year, likely because of the impression from first year that Chemistry was more modern than Physics. A number opted for a combined Physics/Chemistry program but only Alex opted for the Maths/Chemistry program. Few before him had attempted that combination and even fewer had succeeded. Nevertheless, Alex not only succeeded but also had an incredibly strong academic record. However, since his Chemistry courses beyond first year were mostly Physical Chemistry, I later used to tease him, with a small element of truth, that I taught him the only real Chemistry course that he had at Toronto.</p><p>After Alex left Toronto after his B.Sc., I only reconnected with him in the late 1970s when he returned to Ontario. The first strong recollection that I have occurred at the June 1980 meeting of the Canadian Chemical Society in Ottawa. Although Alex wasn't due to start with Bruker until July, Martin Smith, the President of Bruker Canada, had invited him to come to meet Bruker customers. One evening, several of us decided to go over the Ottawa River to Hull in Quebec for dinner at a French restaurant called “Oncle Tom's” (French Canadian soul food?). The meal was superb and the bill was about $300, a huge sum for that time. Since I was short of cash, I paid the bill with a credit card and the rest gave me their shares in cash. On the way back, someone (probably me) suggested that Alex should play a joke on Martin Smith, who was known to be tight-fisted when buying meals for customers, by handing him the bill and saying ‘I hope that you don't mind, I took some of your customers out for dinner’. When Alex, naively, did as suggested, Martin first looked surprised and then stunned when he saw the size of the bill. He shoved in under the counter, muttered in an angry tone “You haven't heard the last of this” and disappeared into the bathroom before anyone could say anything. Sensing that the joke had gone bad, we all waited outside the bathroom door and, as soon as he came out, assured Martin that it was a joke and that we had all paid for our own dinners. Thus, Alex avoided being fired before he even started at Bruker.</p><p>Two of the papers that Alex published at Bruker were particularly useful for me in using 2D NMR. One was the already-mentioned paper on designing phase cycles. The second was with Tim Allman (JMR, 1986, Vol. 68, pp. 533-539), explaining the impact of digital resolution on COSY cross-peak intensity. That allowed me to understand why I was seeing relatively strong COSY correlations even though the actual long-range couplings were barely resolved in a 1D spectrum. However, it was a conversation with him that first led me to realize how valuable Alex could be in my research. I was puzzled by a <sup>13</sup>C spectrum of a fluorobenzene derivative since one of the components of the 1-bond C-F doublet was only half as intense as the other. After very brief thought, Alex's explanation was that it was likely due to cross-relaxation between dipolar relaxation and chemical shift anisotropy, where the two effects were of the same sign for one of the doublet peaks but opposite for the other. Thus, Alex had anticipated the TROSY effect, long before it became popular in protein NMR.</p><p>When the McMaster Chemistry Department wanted to bring Alex back, they had a problem in that their only approval for a new hire was for an Analytical Chemist. However, they somehow managed to convince higher University levels that Alex was qualified to fill the position. I remember that Alex was quite amused by the thought that he was an Analytical Chemist, although I suppose that his emphasis on accurate measurement of exchange rates and other NMR parameters could vaguely qualify as “analytical”.</p><p>After Alex explained my C-F mystery, he became my go-to person for help in resolving other NMR mysteries. We also co-authored three papers, two on artifacts in 2D NMR and one giving a full explanation of BIRD pulses in place of the simple vector explanations I had used in 2D pulse sequence development. We would also often meet socially. For a number of years, his wife, Janet Rossant, was carrying out research in Toronto, first at Mount Sinai Hospital and later as director of Research at Sick Children's Hospital, so they lived in west end Toronto. Particularly after Alex retired from McMaster, the two of us would get together for a pub lunch several times per year. The last time was in October 2016, when I, along with a mutual Mexican friend, Raul Enriquez, met with Alex for lunch. While Alex was his usual cheerful, outgoing, self, both Raul and I were shocked by how much weaker he appeared than the last time that we had seen him. Thus, while saddened, I was not really surprised when, a month later, I got an email from Alex, saying that he had, at most, a few more months to live. Immediately on hearing the bad news, Lewis Kay and several of Alex's McMaster colleagues set out to organize a symposium in his honor. This was held on Dec. 13, 2016 in Toronto and was extremely well attended by many of his friends and several of us gave speeches in his honor. Alex clearly enjoyed seeing so many old friends and managed to give a short speech. However, for the rest of us, it was a bittersweet occasion, knowing that it was very likely the last time that we would ever see him. This was unfortunately confirmed when we heard from Janet that Alex died just after Christmas, 2016.</p><p>My final memory of Alex concerns the hat that he is wearing in his photo. This was a Tilley Endurable hat that he always wore in public. It made him very easy to pick out in crowds at NMR conferences. Tilley Endurables is a Toronto company that manufactures rugged travel clothes. They are so confident in the durability of the Tilley Endurable hat that they guarantee a free replacement if one ever wears out. However, they obviously underestimated Alex's devotion to his hat. At the memorial service for Alex, his brother mentioned that Alex had worn out a number of his Tilley hats over many years (he suggested ten), each time getting his free replacement.</p><p>I don't remember when I first met Alex, but it could have been in 1988 when I took a mini-sabbatical with Bill Reynolds at the University of Toronto. I met many Canadian NMR spectroscopists during that 4-month stay, and occasionally Alex dropped by for lunch. It was obvious to me, very early on, that Alex was a very bright individual and possessed a substantial breadth of NMR Knowledge.</p><p>I had developed a considerable interest in the nuclear Overhauser effect and was intrigued by the maximum magnitude that NOEs might attain in a 2-spin system that was devoid of additional protons that could provide competing relaxation. In 1997, I was given a sample of 1,5-dimethoxy-2,4-dichlorobenzene by a colleague in our Industrial Chemicals Branch. Having an isolated proton that was relaxed solely by six equivalent protons, this molecule appeared to be an excellent candidate for maximum-NOE studies.</p><p>I determined some quick NOEs by irradiating the two equivalent methoxyl groups and observing their combined effect on H-6, which was situated between them. The NOEs were greater than 40% without degassing, and subsequent, more carefully determined NOEs in degassed solutions were close to the theoretical maximum of 50%. At that point, I was concerned with cross-correlation relaxation, which usually has very small, if any, detectable effects on measured NOEs. However, if one is pursuing a maximum NOE, even small effects, like cross correlation, could be a problem. I subsequently discussed this matter with Alex, probably at an ENC, and he was very much interested in this chase for a maximum NOE. We had many other discussions at the meeting and then later when we got home. We ultimately decided that, with the sensitivity of our instruments, a maximum 49% NOE seemed reasonable (<i>Magn. Reson. Chem</i>., 1998, <b>36</b>, 403).</p><p>What impressed me so much on both the above deliberations and in listening to Alex discuss NMR in general with students and colleagues, was what an exceedingly decent person and scholar he was. Every question that was posed, and some were considerably better than others, was answered in a kindly and respectable manner. I don't believe that I ever heard Alex say anything remotely unkind about anyone, although he did find one particular former administrator at McMaster University somewhat amusing.</p><p>I was first attracted to Alex's research when I noticed a paper dealing with relaxation in coupled nuclear spin systems. It was a 22-page paper, “The Relaxation Matrices for AX<sub>2</sub> and AX<sub>3</sub> Nuclear Spin Systems” published in <i>Molecular Physics</i> by Alex and his Ph.D. supervisor, Ruth Lynden-Bell. This was the first time that I had read about superoperator representations, Liouville space, etc. and must confess that I found it challenging to follow. Nevertheless, there were many practical examples illustrating the results which I could readily appreciate because of experiments that I had done while a Postdoc with Ted Becker, 1972-74. If you read Alex's beautiful paper, you will understand one of his favorite sayings, “Everything is a sum of exponentials”.</p><p>After his Ph.D. studies at Cambridge, Alex returned to Canada to work with my former colleague, John S. Martin at the University of Alberta. Alex applied his theoretical expertise to tackle several problems in collaboration with John, for example, FT NMR of non-equilibrium states of complex spin systems. It was during that time that I first remember meeting Alex. I had just started my academic career at the University of Winnipeg. In the fall of 1977, Alex and his wife, Janet Rossant, moved to Ontario where Alex took an appointment at McMaster University and Janet accepted one at Brock University. Being adventurous, they drove from Edmonton to Hamilton, stopping over in Winnipeg to spend a memorable visit with my wife Valerie and me, along with my former Ph.D. supervisor, Ted Schaefer. Both Alex and Ted had been recipients of prestigious Shell Canada Fellowships to study at Cambridge and Oxford, respectively, and Janet had studied at both Oxford and Cambridge, so there was a lot of common ground, including magnetic resonance.</p><p>In the summer of 1980, I started a 1-year sabbatical with Colin Fyfe at the University of Guelph. Alex was in the process of moving from McMaster to Bruker Spectrospin (Canada) in Milton where he worked as an applications scientist (1980-1987). During my time in Colin's lab, Alex helped to organize regular meetings of the NMR groups working in the Toronto, Hamilton, Guelph and Kitchener-Waterloo region. At one of these get-togethers, I remember trying to convince Alex that it was worth working out how to interpret NMR spectra of spin ½ nuclei that were spin-spin coupled to quadrupolar nuclei in solids. I had several examples. eg <sup>31</sup>P coupled to <sup>63/65</sup>Cu that had complex line shapes that I did not know how to deal with at the time. Toward the end of his career, Alex became a world expert on dealing with quadrupolar nuclei in solids. However, in the 1980s, he was busy making major contributions in two-dimensional NMR, the design of phase cycling procedures, etc. It was these first discussion groups that we held in 1980-81 that led to the Annual MOOT Conference (MOntreal-Ottawa-Toronto, a name apparently coined by Mike Bernstein). That began in Montreal in October 1981. The first meeting was largely organized by Alex and Charlie Rodgers from Bruker and was modeled on the long-established NMR Discussion Group in Britain. The meeting has been held annually for the last 30+ years now! It was always great to meet Alex at MOOT, when I could attend, or at the Chemical Society of Canada annual meeting, which both of us attended on a regular basis. Alex was a sounding board, interested in discussing any research problem(s) that one had. We always made a point of getting together in a quiet corner to chat about what we doing, problems that we were having, etc.</p><p>After Alex retired from McMaster, he often came to Edmonton to visit his brother so this provided an opportunity for us to get together. Alex spent many hours in my lab, chatting with students, giving us informal seminars, etc. The last talk that he gave at Alberta was last March 8, “Theory is Easy.” The audience enjoyed his interesting sense of humor, “Life is an eigenvalue problem,” “Programs can be mostly boilerplate—don't write it if you can steal it,” etc.</p><p>Alex will always be remembered as an outstanding scholar and independent thinker. His manuscripts were well written pedagogically and generally addressed fundamental questions or problems, eg “What is a transition.” “From NMR to NQR: The complete range of quadrupolar interactions,” “Liouvillians in NMR, the direct method revisited,” “Origins of spin noise,” “Introduction to Floquet theory,” etc. His family, friends, and the NMR community at large greatly miss Alex.</p>","PeriodicalId":55216,"journal":{"name":"Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A","volume":"45A 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cmr.a.21421","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cmr.a.21421","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The NMR community lost one of its most brilliant and original thinkers when Alex Bain died in late 2016. Many of his friends and former colleagues felt that Alex deserved some form of special recognition in view of his many contributions to NMR, both in Canada and elsewhere. Since Alex had published a number of important articles in Concepts in Magnetic Resonance and also served on the Editorial Board of Concepts, it was decided that a special issue of this journal in his honor would be an appropriate form of recognition of Alex's accomplishments, and three of us agreed to be Guest Editors for the issue.

Alex Bain graduated with a double Honors B.Sc. in Mathematics and Chemistry from the University of Toronto in 1970. He then received a National Research Council of Canada Fellowship for M.Sc. studies at the University of British Columbia where he carried out research on photoelectron spectroscopy. Next, he received a Shell Canada Fellowship for Ph.D. studies at Cambridge University. There he began his NMR career, working with Dr. Ruth Lynden-Bell. Returning to Canada in 1974, a time when full-time academic positions in Chemistry were few and far between, he first had an NRC Postdoctoral Fellowship with Professor John Martin at the University Alberta, followed by a series of limited term appointments at McMaster University and the Scarborough Campus of the University of Toronto. Finally, in 1980, Bruker Canada hired him as research scientist with particular responsibility for NMR programming, including for 2D NMR. He remained there until 1987 when McMaster attracted him back as an Associate Professor and later he became a Full Professor. In 2008, due to health concerns, he opted for early retirement to become an Emeritus Professor. However, he still kept very active in research, both at McMaster and as an unpaid research associate in Lewis Kay's group at Toronto. His contributions there are described in the article by Lewis.

Alex's research combined a strong desire to fully understand complex NMR phenomena with a knowledge and depth of understanding of advanced mathematical methods relevant to NMR that very few in the NMR community could match. Thus, use of Liouvillian operators, Floquet theory and sparse matrices featured prominently in his research. His Ph.D. research included elucidation of alternative relaxation pathways in heteronuclear AX2 and AX3 spin systems, knowledge that is still used today by Lewis Kay and others in designing 3D and 4D pulse sequences for protein NMR research. His Postdoctoral research included the use of Liouvillian operators to calculate NMR transitions. During his first spell at McMaster, he pioneered the use of Superspin to simulate 2D spectra. He also programmed a borrowed computer from a Nicolet FT-IR spectrometer to acquire and process 2D data on a Bruker spectrometer. This is what likely led to his job offer from Bruker. While at Bruker, he published a very useful paper describing a straightforward procedure for designing phase cycling for multi-pulse sequences. The continuing importance of this paper is well-described in the article by Lewis Kay.

After his return to McMaster, Alex focused on methods for highly accurate measurements of kinetic processes by NMR. This included development of a program, called MEXICO, which went beyond earlier programs by allowing analysis of multi-site exchange processes involving singlet peaks and two-site exchange between coupled spin systems. He also published a series of articles that provided a detailed understanding of the NMR and NQR spectra of quadrupolar nuclei. Finally, he also was fascinated by NMR exotica, such as the use of spin noise to generate an NMR spectrum without RF pulses. In addition to his own research, Alex was also very generous in sharing his expertise in NMR with McMaster colleagues, leading to many joint publications. This is well-described in the article by Giuseppe Mancini and co-authors from McMaster, along with a description of the many other ways that he contributed to life at McMaster. Alex was equally generous in providing help and advice to the broader NMR community, particularly on mathematical aspects of NMR.

Alex was a modest and very personable individual who particularly went out of his way to encourage younger scientists early in their careers. His modesty likely worked to his disadvantage in terms of wider recognition of his important work since he never boasted about or promoted his contributions to NMR. Nevertheless, those of us who were fortunate to know Alex well had tremendous respect for both him and his research. He is sorely missed.

My first interaction with Alex was in the spring term of 1966-67. Alex was enrolled in the first year of the Maths, Physics and Chemistry program at Toronto.

This was an extremely rigorous program that each year attracted about 300 of the top Science and Maths students from all over Ontario. The courses were far more advanced than typical first year University courses. At the start of that year, the Chemistry and Physics Departments had come up with an unusual arrangement for splitting teaching responsibilities, one that Physics later regretted. The agreement was that Physics would teach a course in Classical Mechanics while Chemistry taught a course in Quantum Mechanics. John Polanyi taught the first half of the Chemistry course, covering fairly hard-core quantum mechanics. I was surprised, as a very junior staff member, to be asked to give the second term lectures. I covered the approximation methods that chemists used at that time to describe structure and bonding for molecules. At the start of 1967-68, we were pleased to discover that more students than usual had opted for one of the Chemistry options in second year, likely because of the impression from first year that Chemistry was more modern than Physics. A number opted for a combined Physics/Chemistry program but only Alex opted for the Maths/Chemistry program. Few before him had attempted that combination and even fewer had succeeded. Nevertheless, Alex not only succeeded but also had an incredibly strong academic record. However, since his Chemistry courses beyond first year were mostly Physical Chemistry, I later used to tease him, with a small element of truth, that I taught him the only real Chemistry course that he had at Toronto.

After Alex left Toronto after his B.Sc., I only reconnected with him in the late 1970s when he returned to Ontario. The first strong recollection that I have occurred at the June 1980 meeting of the Canadian Chemical Society in Ottawa. Although Alex wasn't due to start with Bruker until July, Martin Smith, the President of Bruker Canada, had invited him to come to meet Bruker customers. One evening, several of us decided to go over the Ottawa River to Hull in Quebec for dinner at a French restaurant called “Oncle Tom's” (French Canadian soul food?). The meal was superb and the bill was about $300, a huge sum for that time. Since I was short of cash, I paid the bill with a credit card and the rest gave me their shares in cash. On the way back, someone (probably me) suggested that Alex should play a joke on Martin Smith, who was known to be tight-fisted when buying meals for customers, by handing him the bill and saying ‘I hope that you don't mind, I took some of your customers out for dinner’. When Alex, naively, did as suggested, Martin first looked surprised and then stunned when he saw the size of the bill. He shoved in under the counter, muttered in an angry tone “You haven't heard the last of this” and disappeared into the bathroom before anyone could say anything. Sensing that the joke had gone bad, we all waited outside the bathroom door and, as soon as he came out, assured Martin that it was a joke and that we had all paid for our own dinners. Thus, Alex avoided being fired before he even started at Bruker.

Two of the papers that Alex published at Bruker were particularly useful for me in using 2D NMR. One was the already-mentioned paper on designing phase cycles. The second was with Tim Allman (JMR, 1986, Vol. 68, pp. 533-539), explaining the impact of digital resolution on COSY cross-peak intensity. That allowed me to understand why I was seeing relatively strong COSY correlations even though the actual long-range couplings were barely resolved in a 1D spectrum. However, it was a conversation with him that first led me to realize how valuable Alex could be in my research. I was puzzled by a 13C spectrum of a fluorobenzene derivative since one of the components of the 1-bond C-F doublet was only half as intense as the other. After very brief thought, Alex's explanation was that it was likely due to cross-relaxation between dipolar relaxation and chemical shift anisotropy, where the two effects were of the same sign for one of the doublet peaks but opposite for the other. Thus, Alex had anticipated the TROSY effect, long before it became popular in protein NMR.

When the McMaster Chemistry Department wanted to bring Alex back, they had a problem in that their only approval for a new hire was for an Analytical Chemist. However, they somehow managed to convince higher University levels that Alex was qualified to fill the position. I remember that Alex was quite amused by the thought that he was an Analytical Chemist, although I suppose that his emphasis on accurate measurement of exchange rates and other NMR parameters could vaguely qualify as “analytical”.

After Alex explained my C-F mystery, he became my go-to person for help in resolving other NMR mysteries. We also co-authored three papers, two on artifacts in 2D NMR and one giving a full explanation of BIRD pulses in place of the simple vector explanations I had used in 2D pulse sequence development. We would also often meet socially. For a number of years, his wife, Janet Rossant, was carrying out research in Toronto, first at Mount Sinai Hospital and later as director of Research at Sick Children's Hospital, so they lived in west end Toronto. Particularly after Alex retired from McMaster, the two of us would get together for a pub lunch several times per year. The last time was in October 2016, when I, along with a mutual Mexican friend, Raul Enriquez, met with Alex for lunch. While Alex was his usual cheerful, outgoing, self, both Raul and I were shocked by how much weaker he appeared than the last time that we had seen him. Thus, while saddened, I was not really surprised when, a month later, I got an email from Alex, saying that he had, at most, a few more months to live. Immediately on hearing the bad news, Lewis Kay and several of Alex's McMaster colleagues set out to organize a symposium in his honor. This was held on Dec. 13, 2016 in Toronto and was extremely well attended by many of his friends and several of us gave speeches in his honor. Alex clearly enjoyed seeing so many old friends and managed to give a short speech. However, for the rest of us, it was a bittersweet occasion, knowing that it was very likely the last time that we would ever see him. This was unfortunately confirmed when we heard from Janet that Alex died just after Christmas, 2016.

My final memory of Alex concerns the hat that he is wearing in his photo. This was a Tilley Endurable hat that he always wore in public. It made him very easy to pick out in crowds at NMR conferences. Tilley Endurables is a Toronto company that manufactures rugged travel clothes. They are so confident in the durability of the Tilley Endurable hat that they guarantee a free replacement if one ever wears out. However, they obviously underestimated Alex's devotion to his hat. At the memorial service for Alex, his brother mentioned that Alex had worn out a number of his Tilley hats over many years (he suggested ten), each time getting his free replacement.

I don't remember when I first met Alex, but it could have been in 1988 when I took a mini-sabbatical with Bill Reynolds at the University of Toronto. I met many Canadian NMR spectroscopists during that 4-month stay, and occasionally Alex dropped by for lunch. It was obvious to me, very early on, that Alex was a very bright individual and possessed a substantial breadth of NMR Knowledge.

I had developed a considerable interest in the nuclear Overhauser effect and was intrigued by the maximum magnitude that NOEs might attain in a 2-spin system that was devoid of additional protons that could provide competing relaxation. In 1997, I was given a sample of 1,5-dimethoxy-2,4-dichlorobenzene by a colleague in our Industrial Chemicals Branch. Having an isolated proton that was relaxed solely by six equivalent protons, this molecule appeared to be an excellent candidate for maximum-NOE studies.

I determined some quick NOEs by irradiating the two equivalent methoxyl groups and observing their combined effect on H-6, which was situated between them. The NOEs were greater than 40% without degassing, and subsequent, more carefully determined NOEs in degassed solutions were close to the theoretical maximum of 50%. At that point, I was concerned with cross-correlation relaxation, which usually has very small, if any, detectable effects on measured NOEs. However, if one is pursuing a maximum NOE, even small effects, like cross correlation, could be a problem. I subsequently discussed this matter with Alex, probably at an ENC, and he was very much interested in this chase for a maximum NOE. We had many other discussions at the meeting and then later when we got home. We ultimately decided that, with the sensitivity of our instruments, a maximum 49% NOE seemed reasonable (Magn. Reson. Chem., 1998, 36, 403).

What impressed me so much on both the above deliberations and in listening to Alex discuss NMR in general with students and colleagues, was what an exceedingly decent person and scholar he was. Every question that was posed, and some were considerably better than others, was answered in a kindly and respectable manner. I don't believe that I ever heard Alex say anything remotely unkind about anyone, although he did find one particular former administrator at McMaster University somewhat amusing.

I was first attracted to Alex's research when I noticed a paper dealing with relaxation in coupled nuclear spin systems. It was a 22-page paper, “The Relaxation Matrices for AX2 and AX3 Nuclear Spin Systems” published in Molecular Physics by Alex and his Ph.D. supervisor, Ruth Lynden-Bell. This was the first time that I had read about superoperator representations, Liouville space, etc. and must confess that I found it challenging to follow. Nevertheless, there were many practical examples illustrating the results which I could readily appreciate because of experiments that I had done while a Postdoc with Ted Becker, 1972-74. If you read Alex's beautiful paper, you will understand one of his favorite sayings, “Everything is a sum of exponentials”.

After his Ph.D. studies at Cambridge, Alex returned to Canada to work with my former colleague, John S. Martin at the University of Alberta. Alex applied his theoretical expertise to tackle several problems in collaboration with John, for example, FT NMR of non-equilibrium states of complex spin systems. It was during that time that I first remember meeting Alex. I had just started my academic career at the University of Winnipeg. In the fall of 1977, Alex and his wife, Janet Rossant, moved to Ontario where Alex took an appointment at McMaster University and Janet accepted one at Brock University. Being adventurous, they drove from Edmonton to Hamilton, stopping over in Winnipeg to spend a memorable visit with my wife Valerie and me, along with my former Ph.D. supervisor, Ted Schaefer. Both Alex and Ted had been recipients of prestigious Shell Canada Fellowships to study at Cambridge and Oxford, respectively, and Janet had studied at both Oxford and Cambridge, so there was a lot of common ground, including magnetic resonance.

In the summer of 1980, I started a 1-year sabbatical with Colin Fyfe at the University of Guelph. Alex was in the process of moving from McMaster to Bruker Spectrospin (Canada) in Milton where he worked as an applications scientist (1980-1987). During my time in Colin's lab, Alex helped to organize regular meetings of the NMR groups working in the Toronto, Hamilton, Guelph and Kitchener-Waterloo region. At one of these get-togethers, I remember trying to convince Alex that it was worth working out how to interpret NMR spectra of spin ½ nuclei that were spin-spin coupled to quadrupolar nuclei in solids. I had several examples. eg 31P coupled to 63/65Cu that had complex line shapes that I did not know how to deal with at the time. Toward the end of his career, Alex became a world expert on dealing with quadrupolar nuclei in solids. However, in the 1980s, he was busy making major contributions in two-dimensional NMR, the design of phase cycling procedures, etc. It was these first discussion groups that we held in 1980-81 that led to the Annual MOOT Conference (MOntreal-Ottawa-Toronto, a name apparently coined by Mike Bernstein). That began in Montreal in October 1981. The first meeting was largely organized by Alex and Charlie Rodgers from Bruker and was modeled on the long-established NMR Discussion Group in Britain. The meeting has been held annually for the last 30+ years now! It was always great to meet Alex at MOOT, when I could attend, or at the Chemical Society of Canada annual meeting, which both of us attended on a regular basis. Alex was a sounding board, interested in discussing any research problem(s) that one had. We always made a point of getting together in a quiet corner to chat about what we doing, problems that we were having, etc.

After Alex retired from McMaster, he often came to Edmonton to visit his brother so this provided an opportunity for us to get together. Alex spent many hours in my lab, chatting with students, giving us informal seminars, etc. The last talk that he gave at Alberta was last March 8, “Theory is Easy.” The audience enjoyed his interesting sense of humor, “Life is an eigenvalue problem,” “Programs can be mostly boilerplate—don't write it if you can steal it,” etc.

Alex will always be remembered as an outstanding scholar and independent thinker. His manuscripts were well written pedagogically and generally addressed fundamental questions or problems, eg “What is a transition.” “From NMR to NQR: The complete range of quadrupolar interactions,” “Liouvillians in NMR, the direct method revisited,” “Origins of spin noise,” “Introduction to Floquet theory,” etc. His family, friends, and the NMR community at large greatly miss Alex.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纪念已故的亚历克斯·d·贝恩教授(1948-2016)的特刊
当Alex Bain于2016年底去世时,NMR社区失去了一位最杰出、最具独创性的思想家。他的许多朋友和前同事都认为Alex应该得到某种形式的特别认可,因为他在加拿大和其他地方对NMR做出了许多贡献。由于亚历克斯在《磁共振概念》杂志上发表了许多重要的文章,同时也在《概念》杂志的编辑委员会任职,我们决定以他的名义专门出版一期杂志,以表彰他的成就,这是对亚历克斯成就的一种适当的认可,我们三人同意担任这期杂志的客座编辑。Alex Bain于1970年毕业于多伦多大学,获得数学和化学双荣誉学士学位。随后,他获得了加拿大国家研究委员会奖学金,在不列颠哥伦比亚大学进行了光电子能谱的研究。随后,他获得了壳牌加拿大奖学金,在剑桥大学攻读博士学位。在那里,他开始了他的核磁共振生涯,与露丝·林登-贝尔博士一起工作。1974年,他回到加拿大,当时化学领域的全职学术职位很少,他首先在阿尔伯塔大学获得了约翰·马丁教授的NRC博士后奖学金,随后在麦克马斯特大学和多伦多大学斯卡伯勒校区获得了一系列有期限的任命。最后,在1980年,布鲁克加拿大公司聘请他为研究科学家,专门负责核磁共振编程,包括二维核磁共振。他在那里一直呆到1987年,麦克马斯特大学邀请他回来担任副教授,后来他成为正教授。2008年,由于健康问题,他选择提前退休,成为名誉教授。然而,他仍然非常积极地从事研究,无论是在麦克马斯特大学,还是在多伦多的刘易斯·凯(Lewis Kay)的团队里担任无薪研究助理。刘易斯在文章中描述了他在那里的贡献。Alex的研究结合了强烈的愿望,充分了解复杂的核磁共振现象,并对核磁共振相关的高级数学方法有深入的了解,这在核磁共振界是很少有人能匹敌的。因此,刘维廉算子、Floquet理论和稀疏矩阵的使用在他的研究中占有突出地位。他的博士研究包括阐明异核AX2和AX3自旋系统中的可选弛豫途径,这些知识至今仍被Lewis Kay和其他人用于设计用于蛋白质核磁共振研究的3D和4D脉冲序列。他的博士后研究包括使用柳维安算子来计算核磁共振跃迁。在麦克马斯特大学的第一段时间里,他率先使用超旋来模拟二维光谱。他还编写了一台从尼科莱红外光谱仪借来的计算机的程序,以获取和处理布鲁克光谱仪上的二维数据。这可能就是布鲁克给他提供工作机会的原因。在布鲁克工作期间,他发表了一篇非常有用的论文,描述了设计多脉冲序列相位循环的简单程序。刘易斯·凯在文章中很好地描述了这篇论文的持续重要性。回到麦克马斯特后,亚历克斯专注于通过核磁共振对动力学过程进行高精度测量的方法。这包括开发一个名为MEXICO的程序,它超越了早期的程序,允许分析涉及单线态峰和耦合自旋系统之间的两个位点交换的多位点交换过程。他还发表了一系列文章,详细介绍了四极核的NMR和NQR谱。最后,他还着迷于核磁共振的新奇事物,比如使用自旋噪声来产生没有射频脉冲的核磁共振光谱。除了他自己的研究,Alex也非常慷慨地与麦克马斯特的同事分享他在核磁共振方面的专业知识,导致许多联合出版物。Giuseppe Mancini和麦克马斯特大学的合著者在文章中很好地描述了这一点,同时还描述了他对麦克马斯特大学生活的许多其他贡献。Alex同样慷慨地为更广泛的NMR社区提供帮助和建议,特别是在NMR的数学方面。亚历克斯是一个谦虚而非常有风度的人,他特别不遗余力地鼓励年轻的科学家在他们的职业生涯早期。他的谦虚可能对他的重要工作的广泛认可产生不利影响,因为他从来没有吹嘘或促进他对NMR的贡献。然而,我们这些有幸了解亚历克斯的人对他和他的研究都怀有极大的敬意。我们非常想念他。我与亚历克斯的第一次接触是在1966-67年的春季学期。亚历克斯参加了多伦多大学数学、物理和化学课程的第一年学习。这是一个非常严格的项目,每年吸引大约300名来自安大略省各地的顶尖科学和数学学生。 这些课程比典型的大学一年级课程要高级得多。那年年初,化学系和物理系提出了一个不同寻常的分配教学职责的办法,物理系后来对此感到后悔。协议是物理教授经典力学课程,化学教授量子力学课程。约翰·波兰尼教授化学课程的前半部分,涵盖了相当核心的量子力学。我很惊讶,作为一个非常初级的职员,被要求给第二学期讲课。我介绍了当时化学家用来描述分子结构和成键的近似方法。在1967-68年初,我们很高兴地发现,在第二年选择化学课程的学生比平时多,可能是因为第一年给人的印象是化学比物理更现代。许多人选择了物理/化学组合课程,但只有亚历克斯选择了数学/化学课程。在他之前,很少有人尝试过这种结合,成功的人就更少了。然而,亚历克斯不仅成功了,而且学习成绩也非常好。然而,由于他第一年以后的化学课程主要是物理化学,我后来常常开玩笑说,我教的是他在多伦多唯一一门真正的化学课程。亚历克斯获得学士学位后离开多伦多,直到上世纪70年代末他回到安大略省时,我才与他重新联系上。我第一次深刻的回忆发生在1980年6月在渥太华举行的加拿大化学学会会议上。虽然亚历克斯要到7月才能开始在布鲁克工作,但布鲁克加拿大公司的总裁马丁·史密斯邀请他去见布鲁克的客户。一天晚上,我们几个人决定横渡渥太华河去魁北克的赫尔,在一家名叫“汤姆叔叔”的法国餐馆吃晚饭(法式加拿大灵魂食品?)这顿饭非常棒,账单大约是300美元,这在当时是一笔巨款。因为手头没有现金,所以我用信用卡支付了账单,其他人用现金支付了他们的股份。在回来的路上,有人(可能是我)建议亚历克斯和马丁·史密斯开个玩笑,马丁·史密斯在为顾客买单时是出了名的吝啬,亚历克斯把账单递给他,说:“希望你不要介意,我带了你的一些顾客出去吃饭。”当亚历克斯天真地按照他的建议去做时,马丁一开始感到惊讶,然后当他看到账单的大小时,他惊呆了。他从柜台底下钻了进去,生气地嘟囔着:“你还没听清楚呢。”没等别人开口,他就消失在浴室里了。我们都感觉到这个玩笑出了岔子,就在浴室门外等着。马丁一出来,我们就向他保证说这是个玩笑,我们都自己付了饭钱。因此,亚历克斯在进入布鲁克之前就避免了被解雇。Alex在Bruker发表的两篇论文对我使用二维核磁共振特别有用。一个是已经提到的设计相位循环的论文。第二次是与Tim Allman (JMR, 1986, Vol. 68, pp. 533-539)合作,解释了数字分辨率对COSY交叉峰强度的影响。这让我明白了为什么我看到了相对较强的COSY相关性,尽管实际的远程耦合在一维光谱中几乎没有得到解决。然而,正是与他的一次谈话让我第一次意识到Alex在我的研究中是多么有价值。我对氟苯衍生物的13C光谱感到困惑,因为1键C-F双联态的一个组分的强度只有另一个的一半。经过短暂的思考,亚历克斯的解释是,这可能是由于偶极弛豫和化学位移各向异性之间的交叉弛豫,其中两个效应在一个双峰中具有相同的符号,而在另一个峰中则相反。因此,早在TROSY效应在蛋白质核磁共振中流行之前,亚历克斯就预料到了它的存在。当麦克马斯特化学系想把亚历克斯请回来时,他们遇到了一个问题,因为他们唯一批准的新员工是分析化学家。然而,他们设法让大学高层相信亚历克斯有资格担任这个职位。我记得Alex对自己是一名分析化学家的想法很感兴趣,尽管我认为他对汇率和其他核磁共振参数的精确测量的强调可以模糊地称为“分析”。在亚历克斯解释了我的碳氟化合物之谜之后,他成了我解决其他核磁共振之谜的求助对象。我们还共同撰写了三篇论文,两篇关于二维核磁共振中的伪影,一篇给出了BIRD脉冲的完整解释,而不是我在二维脉冲序列开发中使用的简单矢量解释。我们也经常在社交场合见面。 多年来,他的妻子珍妮特·罗森特(Janet Rossant)一直在多伦多进行研究,先是在西奈山医院(Mount Sinai Hospital),后来在儿童医院(Sick Children’s Hospital)担任研究主任,所以他们住在多伦多西区。特别是在亚历克斯从麦克马斯特退休后,我们俩每年都会在酒吧吃几次午餐。最后一次是在2016年10月,我和我们共同的墨西哥朋友劳尔·恩里克斯(Raul Enriquez)一起与亚历克斯共进午餐。虽然亚历克斯还是像往常一样开朗、外向,但劳尔和我都惊讶地发现,他比上次见到他时要虚弱得多。因此,一个月后,当我收到亚历克斯的电子邮件,说他最多只能再活几个月的时候,虽然我很难过,但我并不感到惊讶。听到这个坏消息后,刘易斯·凯和亚历克斯在麦克马斯特大学的几位同事立即着手组织了一场向他致敬的研讨会。这是2016年12月13日在多伦多举行的,他的许多朋友都出席了,我们几个人也为他发表了演讲。亚历克斯显然很高兴见到这么多老朋友,并成功地发表了简短的演讲。然而,对于我们其他人来说,这是一个苦乐参半的时刻,因为我们知道这很可能是我们最后一次见到他。不幸的是,当我们从珍妮特那里得知亚历克斯在2016年圣诞节后去世时,这一点得到了证实。我对亚历克斯最后的记忆是他在照片中戴的那顶帽子。这是一顶蒂利耐久牌的帽子,他在公共场合总是戴着。这让他在核磁共振会议的人群中很容易被认出来。Tilley durable是一家多伦多公司,生产坚固耐用的旅行服装。他们对蒂利耐久帽的耐用性非常有信心,如果有一顶帽子磨损了,他们保证免费更换。然而,他们显然低估了亚历克斯对帽子的热爱。在为亚历克斯举行的追悼会上,他的哥哥提到亚历克斯多年来已经磨损了好几顶蒂利帽子(他建议是十顶),每次都得到了免费的新帽子。我不记得我第一次见到亚历克斯是什么时候,但可能是在1988年,当时我和比尔·雷诺兹在多伦多大学休了一个小长假。在那4个月的时间里,我遇到了许多加拿大的核磁共振光谱专家,偶尔亚历克斯也会过来吃午饭。很明显,很早的时候,我就发现Alex是一个非常聪明的人,拥有丰富的核磁共振知识。我对核Overhauser效应产生了相当大的兴趣,并对在没有额外质子提供竞争弛豫的2自旋系统中NOEs可能达到的最大量级产生了兴趣。1997年,我们工业化学品分部的一位同事给了我一个1,5-二甲氧基-2,4-二氯苯的样品。该分子具有一个单独的质子,仅被6个等效质子放松,似乎是最大noe研究的绝佳候选者。我通过照射两个等效的甲氧基并观察它们对位于它们之间的H-6的综合影响,确定了一些快速NOEs。在不脱气的情况下,NOEs大于40%,随后,更仔细地测定脱气溶液中的NOEs接近理论最大值50%。在那一点上,我关注的是相互关联松弛,它通常对测量的noe有非常小的(如果有的话)可检测的影响。然而,如果一个人追求最大的NOE,即使是很小的影响,如相互关系,也可能是一个问题。我随后与Alex讨论了这个问题,可能是在ENC,他对追求最大NOE非常感兴趣。我们在会上进行了很多其他的讨论,然后我们回到家。我们最终决定,以我们仪器的灵敏度,最大49%的NOE似乎是合理的。的原因。化学。, 1998, 36, 403)。让我印象深刻的是,无论是上述讨论,还是听亚历克斯与学生和同事讨论核磁共振,他是一个非常体面的人和学者。提出的每一个问题,有些比其他的好得多,都得到了亲切而可敬的回答。我相信我从未听亚历克斯说过任何对任何人不友善的话,尽管他确实觉得麦克马斯特大学的一位前任管理人员有点好笑。我第一次被Alex的研究吸引是在我注意到一篇关于耦合核自旋系统弛豫的论文时。这是一篇22页的论文,“AX2和AX3核自旋系统的松弛矩阵”,由Alex和他的博士导师Ruth Lynden-Bell发表在《分子物理学》上。这是我第一次读到关于超级算子表示、刘维尔空间等,我必须承认,我发现它具有挑战性。尽管如此,还是有许多实际的例子说明了我很容易理解的结果,因为我在1972年至1974年跟随泰德·贝克尔做博士后时所做的实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A brings together clinicians, chemists, and physicists involved in the application of magnetic resonance techniques. The journal welcomes contributions predominantly from the fields of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), but also encourages submissions relating to less common magnetic resonance imaging and analytical methods. Contributors come from academic, governmental, and clinical communities, to disseminate the latest important experimental results from medical, non-medical, and analytical magnetic resonance methods, as well as related computational and theoretical advances. Subject areas include (but are by no means limited to): -Fundamental advances in the understanding of magnetic resonance -Experimental results from magnetic resonance imaging (including MRI and its specialized applications) -Experimental results from magnetic resonance spectroscopy (including NMR, EPR, and their specialized applications) -Computational and theoretical support and prediction for experimental results -Focused reviews providing commentary and discussion on recent results and developments in topical areas of investigation -Reviews of magnetic resonance approaches with a tutorial or educational approach
期刊最新文献
Density Matrix of Two Spin-1/2 Particles: Pure and Mixed States Electron Spin Resonance Spin Probe Technique for Investigating Non-TEMPO Radicals Dispersed in Nanospaces of a Crystalline Zn Complex Simulated Annealing Method for the Automated Simulation of DNA Dynamics in the HhaI Protein Binding Site Comfortable Nursing in the Intraoperative MRI Evaluation Combined with Microsurgery in the Treatment of Functional Area Glioma Effect of Early Nursing Intervention under Amplitude-Integrated Electroencephalography and Magnetic Resonance Images on Brain Injury in Premature Infants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1