The effect of Peer instructor teaching and clinical supervision on the status and stressors of clinical nursing education

K. Nasiriani, mohammad zare reshkoeyeh, matin arman, S. Mirzaei
{"title":"The effect of Peer instructor teaching and clinical supervision on the status and stressors of clinical nursing education","authors":"K. Nasiriani, mohammad zare reshkoeyeh, matin arman, S. Mirzaei","doi":"10.18502/JMED.V15I2.4229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Peer instructor teaching is an educational model in which senior students teach to their classmates or junior students. Clinical supervision is a formal, systematic, and continuous that the inexperienced person reviews and improves their performance by receiving advice from a supervisor or expert. Clinical education is a vital component of the medical science curriculum and the quality and control of its stressors are important. The purpose of this study was to combine peer instructor training model with clinical supervision on the status and stressors of clinical nursing education. \nMethods: This is a quasi-experimental study in which a combined Peer instructor teaching and clinical supervision program was implemented. The research samples were 60 nursing students of Yazd nursing and Midwifery College who were studying in third and sixth semesters. They were selected by purposive sampling method. Data gathering tools included a four-part questionnaire including demographic characteristics, a questionnaire for assessing instructor performance in clinical education, a standard questionnaire for clinical stressors, a course satisfaction questionnaire and a clinical supervisor completed by self-report. Data analysis was done using SPSS 16 software. \nResult: on the finding the mean score of peer instructor evaluation was 56.42 ± 9.38 and mean score of clinical stressors was 38.72 ± 5.6. Peer instructor in most cases agreed with the peer instructor program and clinical supervision program. \nConclusion: From the learners' point of view, peer instructor performance is at a good level, as well as clinical stressors at the boundary level between moderate and weak, although both results are satisfactory but there is a need for more careful planning and more training by peer educators and more accurate clinical supervision.","PeriodicalId":30509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/JMED.V15I2.4229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Peer instructor teaching is an educational model in which senior students teach to their classmates or junior students. Clinical supervision is a formal, systematic, and continuous that the inexperienced person reviews and improves their performance by receiving advice from a supervisor or expert. Clinical education is a vital component of the medical science curriculum and the quality and control of its stressors are important. The purpose of this study was to combine peer instructor training model with clinical supervision on the status and stressors of clinical nursing education. Methods: This is a quasi-experimental study in which a combined Peer instructor teaching and clinical supervision program was implemented. The research samples were 60 nursing students of Yazd nursing and Midwifery College who were studying in third and sixth semesters. They were selected by purposive sampling method. Data gathering tools included a four-part questionnaire including demographic characteristics, a questionnaire for assessing instructor performance in clinical education, a standard questionnaire for clinical stressors, a course satisfaction questionnaire and a clinical supervisor completed by self-report. Data analysis was done using SPSS 16 software. Result: on the finding the mean score of peer instructor evaluation was 56.42 ± 9.38 and mean score of clinical stressors was 38.72 ± 5.6. Peer instructor in most cases agreed with the peer instructor program and clinical supervision program. Conclusion: From the learners' point of view, peer instructor performance is at a good level, as well as clinical stressors at the boundary level between moderate and weak, although both results are satisfactory but there is a need for more careful planning and more training by peer educators and more accurate clinical supervision.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同伴指导教学与临床督导对临床护理教育现状及压力源的影响
导读:同伴指导员教学是高年级学生对高年级同学或低年级学生进行教学的一种教育模式。临床监督是一个正式的、系统的和持续的过程,没有经验的人通过接受主管或专家的建议来评估和提高他们的表现。临床教育是医学课程的重要组成部分,其压力源的质量和控制非常重要。本研究的目的是将同伴辅导员培训模式与临床督导相结合,探讨临床护理教育的现状及压力源。方法:采用同伴指导教学与临床督导相结合的准实验研究方法。研究样本为亚兹德护理与助产学院大三、六学期的60名护生。采用目的抽样法进行抽样。数据收集工具包括人口统计学特征问卷、临床教育教师绩效评估问卷、临床压力源标准问卷、课程满意度问卷和临床督导自述问卷。数据分析采用SPSS 16软件。结果:发现同伴指导员评价平均分为56.42±9.38分,临床应激源平均分为38.72±5.6分。同伴指导员在大多数情况下同意同伴指导员计划和临床监督计划。结论:从学习者的角度来看,同伴教育者的表现处于良好水平,临床压力源处于中等和较弱的边界水平,虽然两者的结果都令人满意,但需要同伴教育者更仔细的计划和更多的培训,以及更准确的临床监督。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Game-Based Learning for Soft Skills Using the Peer Learning Method in the E-learning Process: Creating a Support-Motivational Mechanism for the Parasitology MS Students in Shahid Sadougi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd E-learning Quality Assessment Indicators: A Narrative Review ChatGPT in writing scientific articles: friend or foe? Explaining Medical Students' Experiences of the Challenges of Clinical Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Qualitative Content Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1