The Sources and Meaning of the Term Decency in the Writings of Prince Dmitry Golitsyn on Fine Arts

IF 0.1 N/A HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Iskusstvovedenie Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.21638/spbu15.2022.407
A. Sechin
{"title":"The Sources and Meaning of the Term Decency in the Writings of Prince Dmitry Golitsyn on Fine Arts","authors":"A. Sechin","doi":"10.21638/spbu15.2022.407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author focuses on one of the most important terms of normative aesthetics and art, decency, which occupies a prominent place in the writings of Prince Dmitry Golitsyn (1734–1803), devoted to the issues of architecture and fine arts. A detailed study of the origins of decency and the meaning of this concept leads to the identification of three stages in its development, consistently considered with the involvement of both source texts and the works of modern scholars. The first stage was the flourishing of classical ancient Greek art, which corresponds to the concept of τὸ πρέπον, formed in the consciousness and rhetorical culture of Athens. In relation to the fine arts, its importance cannot be overestimated, since decency was not conceived without an adequate and eye-catching external expression of typical images, including their social status and ethical content. Under its influence, a system of canons of European art was born in ancient Greece. The second stage is associated with the Renaissance, when the idea of convenevolezza arises. It was focused on the Classical Antiquity and the appropriate iconographic tradition and therefore had a pronounced retrospective character. Finally, the classicism of the Enlightenment era, or neoclassicism, the time of Golitsyn’s life and work, picks up the baton of the norm in art and the deviations from it made by nature itself. Golitsyn’s interpretation of decency in his treatises and its correct understanding by art historians are important, since these works formed the basis of the Russian doctrine of normative, primarily academic art. Decency in the understanding of the ancient Greeks, Italians of the Renaissance and enlighteners of the 18th century did not completely dissolve in the works of the great and ordinary masters of those distant times. It is invariably revived when it comes to the visualization of traditions, proprieties and various norms within artistic culture, about the artist’s service to the model, the canon.","PeriodicalId":40378,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Iskusstvovedenie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Iskusstvovedenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu15.2022.407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author focuses on one of the most important terms of normative aesthetics and art, decency, which occupies a prominent place in the writings of Prince Dmitry Golitsyn (1734–1803), devoted to the issues of architecture and fine arts. A detailed study of the origins of decency and the meaning of this concept leads to the identification of three stages in its development, consistently considered with the involvement of both source texts and the works of modern scholars. The first stage was the flourishing of classical ancient Greek art, which corresponds to the concept of τὸ πρέπον, formed in the consciousness and rhetorical culture of Athens. In relation to the fine arts, its importance cannot be overestimated, since decency was not conceived without an adequate and eye-catching external expression of typical images, including their social status and ethical content. Under its influence, a system of canons of European art was born in ancient Greece. The second stage is associated with the Renaissance, when the idea of convenevolezza arises. It was focused on the Classical Antiquity and the appropriate iconographic tradition and therefore had a pronounced retrospective character. Finally, the classicism of the Enlightenment era, or neoclassicism, the time of Golitsyn’s life and work, picks up the baton of the norm in art and the deviations from it made by nature itself. Golitsyn’s interpretation of decency in his treatises and its correct understanding by art historians are important, since these works formed the basis of the Russian doctrine of normative, primarily academic art. Decency in the understanding of the ancient Greeks, Italians of the Renaissance and enlighteners of the 18th century did not completely dissolve in the works of the great and ordinary masters of those distant times. It is invariably revived when it comes to the visualization of traditions, proprieties and various norms within artistic culture, about the artist’s service to the model, the canon.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
戈利琴亲王美术作品中“体面”一词的来源与意义
作者专注于规范美学和艺术中最重要的术语之一,体面,这在德米特里·戈利琴亲王(1734-1803)的著作中占有突出地位,致力于建筑和美术问题。对体面的起源和这一概念的含义进行详细研究,可以确定其发展的三个阶段,并始终考虑到源文本和现代学者的作品的参与。第一阶段是古希腊古典艺术的兴盛,这与雅典意识和修辞文化中形成的τ ο πρ ον概念相对应。就美术而言,它的重要性怎么估计都不为过,因为如果没有典型图像的充分和引人注目的外部表达,包括它们的社会地位和伦理内容,体面就不会被构想出来。在它的影响下,古希腊诞生了一套欧洲艺术经典体系。第二阶段与文艺复兴时期有关,当时出现了“集会”的概念。它专注于古典古代和适当的图像传统,因此具有明显的回顾性特征。最后,启蒙时代的古典主义,或新古典主义,戈利岑生活和工作的时代,拿起了艺术规范的接力棒,以及自然本身对它的偏离。戈利琴在他的论文中对体面的解释以及艺术史学家对它的正确理解是重要的,因为这些作品构成了俄罗斯规范的、主要是学院派艺术的学说的基础。古希腊人、文艺复兴时期的意大利人和18世纪的启蒙者所理解的正派,并没有完全溶解在那个遥远时代的伟大和普通大师的作品中。当涉及到艺术文化中的传统、礼仪和各种规范的可视化,以及艺术家对模型和经典的服务时,它总是会复活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
50.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Sources of Figurenlehren of the Baroque Era in Musicology of the German Language Space Reproduction Technology. From Replica to Brand The Pragmatics of Romanticism. Edmund Burke as Art Theorist The Pavan in English Music of the 16th–17th Centuries Tapestry Art in Buryatia: Experience and Perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1