Straw Mulching with Minimum Tillage Is the Best Method Suitable for Straw Application under Mechanical Grain Harvesting

Sci. Program. Pub Date : 2021-12-26 DOI:10.1155/2021/6878176
E. Lei, Chaobo Wang, Wen Xue Li, Y. Wang, Yong Bing Yang, Huabin Zheng, Qichen Tang
{"title":"Straw Mulching with Minimum Tillage Is the Best Method Suitable for Straw Application under Mechanical Grain Harvesting","authors":"E. Lei, Chaobo Wang, Wen Xue Li, Y. Wang, Yong Bing Yang, Huabin Zheng, Qichen Tang","doi":"10.1155/2021/6878176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mechanical grain harvesting is a crop production development direction. However, the residue management methods suitable for mechanical grain harvesting have been not established. In order to study the effect of residue management modes on maize yield formation and explore the best residue management methods for mechanical grain harvesting, four crop field surveys were carried out in Southwest China. Crops were mechanically harvested, and the residues were shredded and returned to the field using various straw application methods including straw deep burial with plowing (SDBP), straw shallow burial with rotary tillage (SSBRT), and straw mulching with minimum tillage (SMMT). The first-season rape residues were returned to the field, and the second-season maize yield under SDBP and SSBRT was significantly higher than that under SMMT. However, with the increase in rounds of residue application, compared with SDBP and SSBRT, SMMT continuously increased the soil moisture content in the 0–30 cm soil layer at the early stage of maize growth, increased the soil alkaline-hydrolyzed nitrogen content in the 0–20 cm and 40–60 cm layers, and reduced the soil compaction under 40 cm layer, which were more conducive to the root system growth. Maize yield with the SMMT increased by 5.4% compared with that of the previous season, while the yields with SDBP and SSBRT decreased by 16.7% and 12.7%, respectively, compared with those of the previous season. In conclusion, it is recommended to employ the SMMT method during crop mechanical harvesting, which is of great significance to improve soil quality and increase maize grain yield.","PeriodicalId":21628,"journal":{"name":"Sci. Program.","volume":"81 1","pages":"6878176:1-6878176:12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sci. Program.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6878176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Mechanical grain harvesting is a crop production development direction. However, the residue management methods suitable for mechanical grain harvesting have been not established. In order to study the effect of residue management modes on maize yield formation and explore the best residue management methods for mechanical grain harvesting, four crop field surveys were carried out in Southwest China. Crops were mechanically harvested, and the residues were shredded and returned to the field using various straw application methods including straw deep burial with plowing (SDBP), straw shallow burial with rotary tillage (SSBRT), and straw mulching with minimum tillage (SMMT). The first-season rape residues were returned to the field, and the second-season maize yield under SDBP and SSBRT was significantly higher than that under SMMT. However, with the increase in rounds of residue application, compared with SDBP and SSBRT, SMMT continuously increased the soil moisture content in the 0–30 cm soil layer at the early stage of maize growth, increased the soil alkaline-hydrolyzed nitrogen content in the 0–20 cm and 40–60 cm layers, and reduced the soil compaction under 40 cm layer, which were more conducive to the root system growth. Maize yield with the SMMT increased by 5.4% compared with that of the previous season, while the yields with SDBP and SSBRT decreased by 16.7% and 12.7%, respectively, compared with those of the previous season. In conclusion, it is recommended to employ the SMMT method during crop mechanical harvesting, which is of great significance to improve soil quality and increase maize grain yield.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
秸秆覆盖少耕是机械收获条件下秸秆施用的最佳方式
粮食机械收获是粮食生产的一个发展方向。然而,目前还没有建立适合机械化粮食收获的秸秆管理方法。为研究秸秆管理模式对玉米产量形成的影响,探索秸秆机械收获的最佳管理方式,在西南地区开展了4项作物田间调查。作物机械收获后,秸秆粉碎还田,采用秸秆深埋翻耕(SDBP)、秸秆浅埋旋耕(SSBRT)和秸秆少耕覆盖(SMMT)等多种秸秆施用方法。第1季油菜残茬还田后,SDBP和SSBRT处理的第2季玉米产量显著高于SMMT处理。但随着残茬施用轮次的增加,与SDBP和SSBRT相比,SMMT在玉米生长初期持续提高了0-30 cm土层的土壤含水量,提高了0-20 cm和40 - 60 cm土层的土壤碱水解氮含量,减少了40 cm土层下的土壤压实,更有利于根系生长。SMMT处理的玉米产量比前一季增加了5.4%,而SDBP和SSBRT处理的玉米产量分别比前一季减少了16.7%和12.7%。综上所述,建议在作物机械收获时采用SMMT方法,对改善土壤质量,提高玉米籽粒产量具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Liquid Democracy Enabled Blockchain-Based Electronic Voting System Bike-Sharing Fleet Allocation Optimization Based on Demand Gap and Cycle Rebalancing Strategies Research on the Intelligent Assignment Model of Urban Traffic Planning Based on Optimal Path Optimization Algorithm Online Teaching Wireless Video Stream Resource Dynamic Allocation Method considering Node Ability The Path of Film and Television Animation Creation Using Virtual Reality Technology under the Artificial Intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1