T. Singh, Hasham Sarwar, A. Hurtado, Ebtesam Islam
{"title":"Percutaneous tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 infection and acute respiratory failure","authors":"T. Singh, Hasham Sarwar, A. Hurtado, Ebtesam Islam","doi":"10.12746/swrccc.v11i48.1205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tracheostomy is often performed in patients who need prolonged intubation. COVID -19 brought unforeseen challenges, thus altering previously established norms. In this study, the outcomes of the patients undergoing tracheostomy for respiratory failure due to COVID -19 were studied. \nMethods: This is a single center retrospective observational cohort study of patients who underwent percutaneous tracheostomies between March 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021, due to respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19. Inclusion criteria included performance of percutaneous tracheostomies on patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. Exclusion criteria included patients undergoing surgical tracheostomies, extubation prior to the performance of a tracheotomy, and death prior to the performance of the tracheotomy. \nResults: The study included 49 patients after reviewing the records of 101 patients who underwent tracheostomies during the study period. The average age of the population was 59 ± 11years; 33 patients (67%) were men. The median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on admission was 2. The median duration of mechanical ventilation prior to tracheostomy was 18 days; the median positive end expiratory pressure was 10 cm H2O and the median fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) was 0.45. Two patients died during the procedure, one secondary to cardiac arrest and one secondary to bleeding. Eighteen patients (38%) died after the procedure during hospitalization; the median length of mechanical ventilation for all patients was 32.5 days. Eleven patients (22%) were eventually decannulated. Twenty patients (40%) were discharged to rehabilitation, and nine patients (18%) were discharged home. Eighteen patients (36%) were alive at the end of 90 days. Twelve patients (26%) were lost to follow up after discharge from the hospital. At the time of the tracheostomy, 16 patients (32%) had moderate ARDS as per the Berlin definition, and 12 (24%) had severe ARDS. \nConclusion: Tracheostomy is an important therapeutic intervention in critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation. The COVID-19 pandemic raised important concerns and uncertainties about the management of these patients and the safety of healthcare workers. In this study, 29 patients (59%) undergoing tracheostomies recovered enough to be discharged to rehabilitation or to their homes. The risks to patients and to healthcare workers seem reasonable, but the optimal timing is uncertain and is best tailored to each patient based on his/her clinical status and prognosis. \n \nKeywords: COVID-19, tracheostomy, mechanical ventilation, acute respiratory failure","PeriodicalId":22976,"journal":{"name":"The Southwest Respiratory and Critical Care Chronicles","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southwest Respiratory and Critical Care Chronicles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12746/swrccc.v11i48.1205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Tracheostomy is often performed in patients who need prolonged intubation. COVID -19 brought unforeseen challenges, thus altering previously established norms. In this study, the outcomes of the patients undergoing tracheostomy for respiratory failure due to COVID -19 were studied.
Methods: This is a single center retrospective observational cohort study of patients who underwent percutaneous tracheostomies between March 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021, due to respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19. Inclusion criteria included performance of percutaneous tracheostomies on patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. Exclusion criteria included patients undergoing surgical tracheostomies, extubation prior to the performance of a tracheotomy, and death prior to the performance of the tracheotomy.
Results: The study included 49 patients after reviewing the records of 101 patients who underwent tracheostomies during the study period. The average age of the population was 59 ± 11years; 33 patients (67%) were men. The median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on admission was 2. The median duration of mechanical ventilation prior to tracheostomy was 18 days; the median positive end expiratory pressure was 10 cm H2O and the median fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) was 0.45. Two patients died during the procedure, one secondary to cardiac arrest and one secondary to bleeding. Eighteen patients (38%) died after the procedure during hospitalization; the median length of mechanical ventilation for all patients was 32.5 days. Eleven patients (22%) were eventually decannulated. Twenty patients (40%) were discharged to rehabilitation, and nine patients (18%) were discharged home. Eighteen patients (36%) were alive at the end of 90 days. Twelve patients (26%) were lost to follow up after discharge from the hospital. At the time of the tracheostomy, 16 patients (32%) had moderate ARDS as per the Berlin definition, and 12 (24%) had severe ARDS.
Conclusion: Tracheostomy is an important therapeutic intervention in critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation. The COVID-19 pandemic raised important concerns and uncertainties about the management of these patients and the safety of healthcare workers. In this study, 29 patients (59%) undergoing tracheostomies recovered enough to be discharged to rehabilitation or to their homes. The risks to patients and to healthcare workers seem reasonable, but the optimal timing is uncertain and is best tailored to each patient based on his/her clinical status and prognosis.
Keywords: COVID-19, tracheostomy, mechanical ventilation, acute respiratory failure
背景:气管切开术常用于需要长时间插管的患者。COVID -19带来了无法预料的挑战,从而改变了先前建立的规范。本研究对新冠肺炎所致呼吸衰竭患者行气管切开术的结果进行研究。方法:这是一项单中心回顾性观察队列研究,研究对象是2020年3月1日至2021年9月30日期间因COVID-19继发呼吸衰竭接受经皮气管切开术的患者。纳入标准包括确诊为COVID-19的患者行经皮气管切开术。排除标准包括接受气管切开术、气管切开术前拔管和气管切开术前死亡的患者。结果:在回顾研究期间101例气管切开术患者的记录后,该研究纳入了49例患者。人口平均年龄59±11岁;33例(67%)为男性。入院时序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分中位数为2分。气管切开术前机械通气的中位持续时间为18天;中位呼气末正压为10 cm H2O,中位吸入氧分数(FiO2)为0.45。两名患者在手术过程中死亡,一名继发于心脏骤停,一名继发于出血。18例患者(38%)在住院期间手术后死亡;所有患者机械通气的中位时间为32.5天。11例患者(22%)最终进行了脱管。20例患者(40%)出院康复,9例患者(18%)出院回家。在90天结束时,18例患者(36%)存活。出院后失访12例(26%)。在气管切开术时,16例(32%)患者为中度ARDS(柏林定义),12例(24%)患者为重度ARDS。结论:气管切开术是需要机械通气的危重病人重要的治疗干预措施。COVID-19大流行引发了对这些患者管理和医护人员安全的重大担忧和不确定性。在本研究中,29名接受气管切开术的患者(59%)康复到可以出院或回家。对患者和医护人员的风险似乎是合理的,但最佳时机是不确定的,最好根据每个患者的临床状况和预后量身定制。关键词:COVID-19,气管造口术,机械通气,急性呼吸衰竭