H. A. Zeid, Giuseppe Salfi, Reem M A Mansour, M. N. Jardak, H. Khan, M. Abuassi, Tara Boustany, Somtochukwu Onwuzo, A. Boustany
{"title":"Differentiating Between Mass-forming Chronic Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Challenging Clinical Approach","authors":"H. A. Zeid, Giuseppe Salfi, Reem M A Mansour, M. N. Jardak, H. Khan, M. Abuassi, Tara Boustany, Somtochukwu Onwuzo, A. Boustany","doi":"10.38179/ijcr.v3i1.244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a tumor of the pancreas that has a 5-year survival rate as low as 7.8%. In cases of chronic pancreatitis, it is sometimes challenging to rule out neoplastic changes, as mass-forming pancreatitis (MFCP) that can occur secondary to long-lasting inflammation can commonly mimic the presentation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The clinical picture, laboratory, and radiological imaging of PDAC and MFCP may sometimes overlap, resulting in a higher incidence of misdiagnosis and unnecessary surgery.\n Aim: We aim to describe the various tools available to help physicians distinguish between mass-forming chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.\nMethods: A literature search was conducted on “PubMed” using the following terms: pancreatic carcinoma, mass-forming chronic pancreatitis, and pancreatic mass. Several articles discussing imaging modalities including ultrasound, CT-scan, and MRI; and laboratory markers including cancer antigen 19–9 (CA 19-9), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), glypican-1 (GP-1), low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), and K-RAS, were reviewed.\nDiscussion: Despite their similar presentations, the management of MFCP and PDAC is very different. The similarity in history, clinical symptoms, and imaging findings can lead to unnecessary procedures. In this review, we examined several modalities that physicians might use to avoid any misdiagnosis.\n Conclusion: Although none of these tests alone has been shown to be superior to the others, a potential suggestion might be to use a combination of these tests to allow a reliable diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":73437,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical research & trials","volume":"128 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical research & trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38179/ijcr.v3i1.244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a tumor of the pancreas that has a 5-year survival rate as low as 7.8%. In cases of chronic pancreatitis, it is sometimes challenging to rule out neoplastic changes, as mass-forming pancreatitis (MFCP) that can occur secondary to long-lasting inflammation can commonly mimic the presentation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The clinical picture, laboratory, and radiological imaging of PDAC and MFCP may sometimes overlap, resulting in a higher incidence of misdiagnosis and unnecessary surgery.
Aim: We aim to describe the various tools available to help physicians distinguish between mass-forming chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Methods: A literature search was conducted on “PubMed” using the following terms: pancreatic carcinoma, mass-forming chronic pancreatitis, and pancreatic mass. Several articles discussing imaging modalities including ultrasound, CT-scan, and MRI; and laboratory markers including cancer antigen 19–9 (CA 19-9), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), glypican-1 (GP-1), low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), and K-RAS, were reviewed.
Discussion: Despite their similar presentations, the management of MFCP and PDAC is very different. The similarity in history, clinical symptoms, and imaging findings can lead to unnecessary procedures. In this review, we examined several modalities that physicians might use to avoid any misdiagnosis.
Conclusion: Although none of these tests alone has been shown to be superior to the others, a potential suggestion might be to use a combination of these tests to allow a reliable diagnosis.
胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)是一种胰腺肿瘤,其5年生存率低至7.8%。在慢性胰腺炎病例中,有时很难排除肿瘤改变,因为继发于长期炎症的团块形成性胰腺炎(MFCP)通常可以模仿胰腺导管腺癌的表现。PDAC和MFCP的临床、实验室和影像学有时可能重叠,导致更高的误诊发生率和不必要的手术。目的:我们的目的是描述各种可用的工具,以帮助医生区分肿块形成的慢性胰腺炎和胰腺导管腺癌。方法:在“PubMed”中检索文献,使用以下术语:胰腺癌、形成肿块的慢性胰腺炎和胰腺肿块。几篇讨论成像方式的文章,包括超声、ct扫描和MRI;并对癌抗原19-9 (CA 19-9)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、甘聚糖-1 (GP-1)、低密度脂蛋白受体(LDLR)、K-RAS等实验室标志物进行了综述。讨论:尽管他们的表现相似,但MFCP和PDAC的管理非常不同。病史、临床症状和影像学表现的相似性可能导致不必要的手术。在这篇综述中,我们研究了医生可能用来避免误诊的几种模式。结论:虽然这些测试中没有一个单独优于其他测试,但一个潜在的建议可能是使用这些测试的组合来进行可靠的诊断。