AJAX AND OTHER OBJECTS: HOMER'S VIBRANT MATERIALISM

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 0 CLASSICS RAMUS-CRITICAL STUDIES IN GREEK AND ROMAN LITERATURE Pub Date : 2015-11-27 DOI:10.1017/rmu.2015.4
A. Purves
{"title":"AJAX AND OTHER OBJECTS: HOMER'S VIBRANT MATERIALISM","authors":"A. Purves","doi":"10.1017/rmu.2015.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ἕρϰος Ἀχαιῶν: ἔμψυχον τεῖχος τῶν Ἑλλήνων. Bulwark of the Achaeans: living wall of the Greeks. Schol. D. Il. 6.5 (on Ajax) Now, still breathing, he is simply matter… Simone Weil, ‘The Iliad or the Poem of Force’ The two quotations at the start of this paper, one from the D scholion on the Iliad and the other from Simone Weil's famous essay on force, both make of the Homeric warrior a kind of ‘breathing material’. Two references, then, to the liveliness of objects, but each meaning very different things. For the scholiast places man on the same side as materiality, as if humans and things can equally be infused with life and can exist in a sort of continuum, but Weil argues that a human who is reduced to mere matter, even if he is a still a thing that breathes, is as good as nothing. Unlike the scholiast, Weil's interpretation is predicated on a strong belief in the duality of body and soul in the structure of human life, and since objects do not have souls they are, for her, essentially dead. Throughout her essay, Weil visits again and again the materiality of Homeric man and his propensity to turn, under the crushing power of force, into what she calls alternately a ‘thing’, ‘inert matter’, ‘stone’, and even ‘nothingness’. But for the D scholiast, the comparison of Ajax to stone does not subjugate him or turn him into a ‘mere’ or ‘inert’ object. On the contrary, the gloss ἔμψυχον τεῖχος speaks instead to the lively and permeable boundary between human and nonhuman in early Greek epic, one that suggests that objects can have their own life form, their own energy, vitality, and even creativity.","PeriodicalId":43863,"journal":{"name":"RAMUS-CRITICAL STUDIES IN GREEK AND ROMAN LITERATURE","volume":"59 1","pages":"75 - 94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAMUS-CRITICAL STUDIES IN GREEK AND ROMAN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/rmu.2015.4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

ἕρϰος Ἀχαιῶν: ἔμψυχον τεῖχος τῶν Ἑλλήνων. Bulwark of the Achaeans: living wall of the Greeks. Schol. D. Il. 6.5 (on Ajax) Now, still breathing, he is simply matter… Simone Weil, ‘The Iliad or the Poem of Force’ The two quotations at the start of this paper, one from the D scholion on the Iliad and the other from Simone Weil's famous essay on force, both make of the Homeric warrior a kind of ‘breathing material’. Two references, then, to the liveliness of objects, but each meaning very different things. For the scholiast places man on the same side as materiality, as if humans and things can equally be infused with life and can exist in a sort of continuum, but Weil argues that a human who is reduced to mere matter, even if he is a still a thing that breathes, is as good as nothing. Unlike the scholiast, Weil's interpretation is predicated on a strong belief in the duality of body and soul in the structure of human life, and since objects do not have souls they are, for her, essentially dead. Throughout her essay, Weil visits again and again the materiality of Homeric man and his propensity to turn, under the crushing power of force, into what she calls alternately a ‘thing’, ‘inert matter’, ‘stone’, and even ‘nothingness’. But for the D scholiast, the comparison of Ajax to stone does not subjugate him or turn him into a ‘mere’ or ‘inert’ object. On the contrary, the gloss ἔμψυχον τεῖχος speaks instead to the lively and permeable boundary between human and nonhuman in early Greek epic, one that suggests that objects can have their own life form, their own energy, vitality, and even creativity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿贾克斯和其他物体:荷马充满活力的物质主义
ς ρϰοςἈχαι ν ν τε ν χος τ ν νἙλλ ν ν ν。亚该亚人的堡垒:希腊人的活墙。Schol。现在,他还在呼吸,他只是物质……西蒙娜·薇依,《伊利亚特》或《力之诗》本文开头的两段引文,一段出自《伊利亚特》的学者,另一段出自西蒙娜·薇依著名的《力之诗》,都把荷马战士比作一种“会呼吸的物质”。这两种说法都是指物体的活力,但每一种都有不同的含义。因为经院学者把人与物质性放在同一方面,仿佛人和物都可以同样地注入生命,都可以存在于某种连续体中,但韦尔认为,人被简化为纯粹的物质,即使他仍然是一个呼吸的东西,也与虚无无异。与经院学者不同,韦尔的解释是基于对人类生命结构中肉体和灵魂二元性的坚定信念,因为物体没有灵魂,对她来说,它们本质上是死亡的。在她的整篇文章中,韦尔一次又一次地谈到了荷马时代的人的物质性,以及他在力量的碾压下变成她所说的“物”、“惰性物质”、“石头”甚至“虚无”的倾向。但对于D学者来说,把阿贾克斯比作石头并没有使他屈服,也没有把他变成一个“纯粹的”或“惰性的”物体。相反,ς μψ ον τε ο χος这个词表达的是早期希腊史诗中人类与非人类之间生动而可渗透的界限,这表明物体可以有自己的生命形式,自己的能量、活力,甚至创造力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
CONFLICT, TRAGEDY, AND INTERRACIALITY: BOB THOMPSON PAINTS VERGIL'S CAMILLA THE THIRD LIFECYCLE OF PHILOKLEON IN ARISTOPHANES’ WASPS METAGENRE AND THE COMPETENT AUDIENCE OF PLAUTUS’ CAPTIVI ERASING THE AETHIOPIAN IN CICERO'S POST REDITUM IN SENATU RMU volume 51 issue 2 Cover and Back matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1