Middle ageism: when social climate and perceived employability relate to attitudes and intent to hire middle-aged employees

Galy Binyamin, Yael Brender-Ilan
{"title":"Middle ageism: when social climate and perceived employability relate to attitudes and intent to hire middle-aged employees","authors":"Galy Binyamin, Yael Brender-Ilan","doi":"10.1108/edi-09-2021-0234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeAs the global workforce ages, organizations face unprecedented challenges, especially managing effective communication between generations. The phenomenon of middle ageism (i.e. discriminating against middle-aged employees based on their age) has become more prevalent. The authors examined how contextual settings and communication affect attitudes toward middle-aged employees and hiring intentions.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from 537 employees from various organizations, via questionnaires. The moderated mediation model was analyzed using Hayes' PROCESS models.FindingsResults showed that attitudes toward middle-aged employees mediated the relationship between social climate of shared codes and language and hiring intentions. Social climate was positively related to attitudes toward their adaptability, but negatively to attitudes toward their ability. Also, decision-makers' own perceived employability moderated the relationship between attitudes toward employees' adaptability and hiring intentions, and the indirect relationship between social climate and hiring intentions.Practical implicationsSince age diversity is expected to become one of the most dominant diversity classifications in the very near future, coping with middle ageism constitutes a growing challenge for managers and HR staff. The findings indicate that in order to enhance sustainable employment and prevent discrimination, organizations need not only maintain a supportive climate for older employees, as an affirmative action, but also ensure better communication in terms of sharing codes and language that enhance positive attitudes toward middle-aged colleagues.Originality/valueIn an era where diversity and inclusion dominate human resource management decision making, this study contributes to the literature on the underexplored domain of age diversity.","PeriodicalId":72949,"journal":{"name":"Equality, diversity and inclusion : an international journal","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equality, diversity and inclusion : an international journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-09-2021-0234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeAs the global workforce ages, organizations face unprecedented challenges, especially managing effective communication between generations. The phenomenon of middle ageism (i.e. discriminating against middle-aged employees based on their age) has become more prevalent. The authors examined how contextual settings and communication affect attitudes toward middle-aged employees and hiring intentions.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from 537 employees from various organizations, via questionnaires. The moderated mediation model was analyzed using Hayes' PROCESS models.FindingsResults showed that attitudes toward middle-aged employees mediated the relationship between social climate of shared codes and language and hiring intentions. Social climate was positively related to attitudes toward their adaptability, but negatively to attitudes toward their ability. Also, decision-makers' own perceived employability moderated the relationship between attitudes toward employees' adaptability and hiring intentions, and the indirect relationship between social climate and hiring intentions.Practical implicationsSince age diversity is expected to become one of the most dominant diversity classifications in the very near future, coping with middle ageism constitutes a growing challenge for managers and HR staff. The findings indicate that in order to enhance sustainable employment and prevent discrimination, organizations need not only maintain a supportive climate for older employees, as an affirmative action, but also ensure better communication in terms of sharing codes and language that enhance positive attitudes toward middle-aged colleagues.Originality/valueIn an era where diversity and inclusion dominate human resource management decision making, this study contributes to the literature on the underexplored domain of age diversity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中年歧视:当社会氛围和感知就业能力与雇用中年员工的态度和意图有关时
随着全球劳动力的老龄化,组织面临着前所未有的挑战,尤其是管理几代人之间的有效沟通。中年歧视(即基于年龄歧视中年员工)的现象越来越普遍。作者研究了环境设置和沟通如何影响对中年员工的态度和雇佣意图。设计/方法/方法通过问卷调查从不同组织的537名员工中收集数据。采用Hayes' s PROCESS模型对有调节的中介模型进行分析。结果表明,对中年员工的态度在共享代码和语言的社会氛围与招聘意向之间起中介作用。社会氛围与适应性态度正相关,与能力态度负相关。决策者自身的就业能力感知调节了员工适应性态度与招聘意向之间的关系,以及社会氛围与招聘意向之间的间接关系。由于年龄多样性有望在不久的将来成为最主要的多样性分类之一,因此应对中年歧视对管理人员和人力资源人员构成了越来越大的挑战。研究结果表明,为了促进可持续就业和防止歧视,组织不仅需要保持对老年员工的支持氛围,作为一种平权行动,还需要确保在共享代码和语言方面进行更好的沟通,以增强对中年同事的积极态度。在一个多元化和包容性主导人力资源管理决策的时代,本研究对年龄多样性这一尚未被充分探索的领域做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Who gets to choose: a global perspective on gender, work and choice in the post-pandemic workplace What is there to be happy about? The impact of race and resilience in the United States A key to recovery for working mothers? Psychological detachment and the roles of relaxation, mastery and control on boundary violations Investigating the gender pay gap in the Maltese financial and insurance sector: a macro and micro approach The effects of national and international tourism on income inequality: evidence from Asia-Pacific economies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1