Who gets to choose: a global perspective on gender, work and choice in the post-pandemic workplace

C. Dalessandro, Daniel Patterson, A. Lovell
{"title":"Who gets to choose: a global perspective on gender, work and choice in the post-pandemic workplace","authors":"C. Dalessandro, Daniel Patterson, A. Lovell","doi":"10.1108/edi-06-2022-0159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeCompared to the years prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, more workers today seemingly have choice over where, when and how they do their work. However, gender inequalities at work and at home persist, which may impact perceptions of choice. Thus, researchers must investigate the potential impact of gender and domestic responsibilities on perceptions of work-related options, including perceptions of workspace choice. Design/methodology/approachUsing an original dataset with workers in North America, South America, Europe and Asia (N = 3,147), the authors conducted logistic regression analyses to explore whether workers felt they had a choice in where they do their work (workspace choice). In addition to gender, the authors considered the effect of domestic responsibilities (childcare and housework) on worker perceptions of workspace choice.FindingsIn the paper's initial regression, the authors found that men (OR: 1.24; 95%CI 1.04–1.48) as well as workers reporting that a partner was responsible for all or most of the housework (OR: 1.80; 95%CI 1.34–2.40) and childcare (OR 1.51; 95%CI 1.09–2.09) reported feeling a greater sense of workspace choice. Simultaneously, follow-up regression analyses found that women and men whose partners had a greater share of domestic responsibility had amplified perceptions of choice. However, surprisingly, men who claimed primary responsibility for domestic work also reported more choice over workspace.Originality/valueUsing an international sample, the authors explore gender inequities in worker perceptions of workspace choice. The authors' findings suggest that domestic responsibilities interact with gender in interesting ways, leading to differences in perceptions of choice in the post-pandemic workplace.","PeriodicalId":72949,"journal":{"name":"Equality, diversity and inclusion : an international journal","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equality, diversity and inclusion : an international journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-06-2022-0159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeCompared to the years prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, more workers today seemingly have choice over where, when and how they do their work. However, gender inequalities at work and at home persist, which may impact perceptions of choice. Thus, researchers must investigate the potential impact of gender and domestic responsibilities on perceptions of work-related options, including perceptions of workspace choice. Design/methodology/approachUsing an original dataset with workers in North America, South America, Europe and Asia (N = 3,147), the authors conducted logistic regression analyses to explore whether workers felt they had a choice in where they do their work (workspace choice). In addition to gender, the authors considered the effect of domestic responsibilities (childcare and housework) on worker perceptions of workspace choice.FindingsIn the paper's initial regression, the authors found that men (OR: 1.24; 95%CI 1.04–1.48) as well as workers reporting that a partner was responsible for all or most of the housework (OR: 1.80; 95%CI 1.34–2.40) and childcare (OR 1.51; 95%CI 1.09–2.09) reported feeling a greater sense of workspace choice. Simultaneously, follow-up regression analyses found that women and men whose partners had a greater share of domestic responsibility had amplified perceptions of choice. However, surprisingly, men who claimed primary responsibility for domestic work also reported more choice over workspace.Originality/valueUsing an international sample, the authors explore gender inequities in worker perceptions of workspace choice. The authors' findings suggest that domestic responsibilities interact with gender in interesting ways, leading to differences in perceptions of choice in the post-pandemic workplace.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁来选择:大流行后工作场所性别、工作和选择的全球视角
与2019冠状病毒病大流行前的几年相比,如今更多的工人似乎可以选择在哪里、何时以及如何工作。然而,工作和家庭中的性别不平等仍然存在,这可能会影响人们对选择的看法。因此,研究人员必须调查性别和家庭责任对工作选择的潜在影响,包括对工作空间选择的看法。使用北美、南美、欧洲和亚洲员工的原始数据集(N = 3147),作者进行了逻辑回归分析,以探讨员工是否认为他们可以选择在哪里工作(工作空间选择)。除了性别之外,作者还考虑了家庭责任(照顾孩子和做家务)对员工对工作空间选择的影响。在论文的初始回归中,作者发现男性(OR: 1.24;95%可信区间1.04-1.48),以及报告伴侣负责全部或大部分家务的员工(or: 1.80;95%CI 1.34-2.40)和儿童保育(OR 1.51;95%(可信区间1.09-2.09)报告说,他们对工作场所的选择感更强了。与此同时,后续的回归分析发现,伴侣承担更多家庭责任的女性和男性都放大了选择的感知。然而,令人惊讶的是,声称主要负责家务的男性在工作空间上也有更多的选择。原创性/价值使用国际样本,作者探讨了员工对工作空间选择的看法中的性别不平等。作者的研究结果表明,家庭责任与性别以有趣的方式相互作用,导致大流行后工作场所对选择的看法存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Who gets to choose: a global perspective on gender, work and choice in the post-pandemic workplace What is there to be happy about? The impact of race and resilience in the United States A key to recovery for working mothers? Psychological detachment and the roles of relaxation, mastery and control on boundary violations Investigating the gender pay gap in the Maltese financial and insurance sector: a macro and micro approach The effects of national and international tourism on income inequality: evidence from Asia-Pacific economies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1