Crack Closure Behavior on a Variety of Materials under High Stress Ratios and Kmax Test Conditions

Y. Yamada, J. Newman, S. Daniewicz, S. Dean
{"title":"Crack Closure Behavior on a Variety of Materials under High Stress Ratios and Kmax Test Conditions","authors":"Y. Yamada, J. Newman, S. Daniewicz, S. Dean","doi":"10.1520/JAI103973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fatigue-crack-growth-rate tests on compact specimens have been made on a variety of materials (2024-T3, 2324-T39, 7050-T7451, 4340 steel, and Inconel-718) over a wide range in stress ratios from 0.1 to 0.9 (and 0.95 in some cases) and several Kmax test conditions. Test data has been generated from threshold to near fracture using the compression precracking constant amplitude or compression precracking load reduction test methods in the threshold regime; and constant-amplitude loading at higher rates. A remote back-face strain (BFS) gage was used to monitor crack growth and to measure crack-opening loads. Local strain gages were also placed along and slightly off (about one-half thickness) the anticipated crack path to measure crack-opening loads. Elber’s load-against-reduced-strain method was used to determine crack-opening loads by means of visual inspection (equivalent to a 0 % compliance offset). For a particular material, the BFS and local strain gages produced essentially the same crack-opening loads at low stress ratio (R = 0.1) conditions. But at high stress ratios (R ≥ 0.7) and Kmax test conditions, the local gages produced significantly higher crack-opening loads than the BFS gage in the threshold and near-threshold regimes. Previous research had proposed that high stress ratios (R ≥ 0.7) and Kmax test conditions produce closure-free conditions based on crack-mouth-opening-displacement or BFS gages, and plasticity-induced crack-closure modeling. However, crack closure under high stress ratios (R ≥ 0.7) and Kmax test conditions is attributed to residual-plastic deformations, crack-surface roughness, and/or fretting-debris. From local crack-opening load measurements, the effective stress-intensity-factor range (ΔKeff) appears to be uniquely related to the crack-growth rate in the threshold and near-threshold regimes.","PeriodicalId":15057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Astm International","volume":"45 1","pages":"103973"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Astm International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI103973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Fatigue-crack-growth-rate tests on compact specimens have been made on a variety of materials (2024-T3, 2324-T39, 7050-T7451, 4340 steel, and Inconel-718) over a wide range in stress ratios from 0.1 to 0.9 (and 0.95 in some cases) and several Kmax test conditions. Test data has been generated from threshold to near fracture using the compression precracking constant amplitude or compression precracking load reduction test methods in the threshold regime; and constant-amplitude loading at higher rates. A remote back-face strain (BFS) gage was used to monitor crack growth and to measure crack-opening loads. Local strain gages were also placed along and slightly off (about one-half thickness) the anticipated crack path to measure crack-opening loads. Elber’s load-against-reduced-strain method was used to determine crack-opening loads by means of visual inspection (equivalent to a 0 % compliance offset). For a particular material, the BFS and local strain gages produced essentially the same crack-opening loads at low stress ratio (R = 0.1) conditions. But at high stress ratios (R ≥ 0.7) and Kmax test conditions, the local gages produced significantly higher crack-opening loads than the BFS gage in the threshold and near-threshold regimes. Previous research had proposed that high stress ratios (R ≥ 0.7) and Kmax test conditions produce closure-free conditions based on crack-mouth-opening-displacement or BFS gages, and plasticity-induced crack-closure modeling. However, crack closure under high stress ratios (R ≥ 0.7) and Kmax test conditions is attributed to residual-plastic deformations, crack-surface roughness, and/or fretting-debris. From local crack-opening load measurements, the effective stress-intensity-factor range (ΔKeff) appears to be uniquely related to the crack-growth rate in the threshold and near-threshold regimes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同材料在高应力比和Kmax试验条件下的裂纹闭合行为
在各种材料(2024-T3、2324-T39、7050-T7451、4340钢和Inconel-718)的应力比范围从0.1到0.9(在某些情况下为0.95)和几个Kmax测试条件下,对致密试样进行了疲劳裂纹扩展速率试验。采用阈值状态下的压缩预裂恒幅或压缩预裂减载试验方法,生成了从阈值到近断裂的试验数据;和更高速率的等幅加载。远程后面应变(BFS)计用于监测裂纹扩展和测量裂纹打开载荷。局部应变片也沿着预期裂纹路径放置,并稍微偏离(约一半厚度),以测量裂纹打开载荷。Elber的荷载-减小应变法用于通过目视检查(相当于0%的柔度偏移)来确定裂纹打开载荷。对于特定材料,在低应力比(R = 0.1)条件下,BFS和局部应变片产生的开裂载荷基本相同。但在高应力比(R≥0.7)和Kmax试验条件下,在阈值和近阈值条件下,局部应变应变产生的开裂载荷明显高于BFS应变应变。先前的研究提出,基于裂纹张开位移或BFS测量以及塑性裂纹闭合模型,高应力比(R≥0.7)和Kmax试验条件会产生无闭合条件。然而,在高应力比(R≥0.7)和Kmax试验条件下,裂纹闭合归因于残余塑性变形、裂纹表面粗糙度和/或微动碎屑。从局部裂纹打开载荷测量中,有效应力强度因子范围(ΔKeff)似乎与阈值和近阈值状态下的裂纹扩展速率唯一相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flame Retardant Emissions from Spray Polyurethane Foam Insulation Economic Impact of Improved Service-Life Prediction for Seams in Low-Slope EPDM Roofing The Economics of Residential Fire Sprinklers and the Potential Impact of Recent Code Changes Roller Profile Development for an Axially Loaded, Single Row Spherical Roller Bearing in an Oscillating Application Characterization of Adhesive Joints for Hybrid Steel-Glass Beams by Means of Simplified Small Scale Tests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1