You can’t beat the feeling: How emotional responses to exemplars in news stories affect perceptions of expert sources and the message of the news story

IF 0.4 Q4 COMMUNICATION Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.1386/ajms_00048_1
L. Heiselberg, Morten Skovsgaard
{"title":"You can’t beat the feeling: How emotional responses to exemplars in news stories affect perceptions of expert sources and the message of the news story","authors":"L. Heiselberg, Morten Skovsgaard","doi":"10.1386/ajms_00048_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Journalists include ordinary people as exemplars – also known as case sources – in news stories to illustrate the general issue through their personal accounts. These accounts from exemplars tend to evoke emotions in the audience and carry greater weight than base rate information when people form perceptions or attitudes on the problem at hand. In this study, drawing on a news story in which an expert source and an exemplar provide conflicting information, we explore viewers’ emotional response to the exemplar and their perceptions of the expert source and the main message of the news story. We do this by presenting participants with two versions of a television news story – one with and one without an exemplar. We measure participants’ emotional response through a combination of open-ended and close-ended self-reports and directly through electrodermal activity, and we explore their perception of sources and the message of the story through open-ended questions. We find that viewers experience increased arousal when they watch the personal account of an exemplar, and that they tend to interpret the base rate information in the light of the exemplar’s account. Furthermore, some respondents tend to delegitimize the expert source that contradicts the account of the exemplar. We discuss the implications that these results have for journalists and provide tentative advice on which measures journalists can take to counter such effects.","PeriodicalId":43197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00048_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Journalists include ordinary people as exemplars – also known as case sources – in news stories to illustrate the general issue through their personal accounts. These accounts from exemplars tend to evoke emotions in the audience and carry greater weight than base rate information when people form perceptions or attitudes on the problem at hand. In this study, drawing on a news story in which an expert source and an exemplar provide conflicting information, we explore viewers’ emotional response to the exemplar and their perceptions of the expert source and the main message of the news story. We do this by presenting participants with two versions of a television news story – one with and one without an exemplar. We measure participants’ emotional response through a combination of open-ended and close-ended self-reports and directly through electrodermal activity, and we explore their perception of sources and the message of the story through open-ended questions. We find that viewers experience increased arousal when they watch the personal account of an exemplar, and that they tend to interpret the base rate information in the light of the exemplar’s account. Furthermore, some respondents tend to delegitimize the expert source that contradicts the account of the exemplar. We discuss the implications that these results have for journalists and provide tentative advice on which measures journalists can take to counter such effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你无法抗拒这种感觉:对新闻故事中的范例的情绪反应如何影响对专家来源的看法和新闻故事的信息
记者在新闻报道中选取普通人作为范例——也被称为案例来源——通过他们的个人描述来说明一般问题。当人们对手头的问题形成看法或态度时,这些来自范例的叙述往往会引起听众的情绪,比基本比率信息更有分量。在本研究中,我们选取了一个新闻故事,其中专家来源和范例提供了相互矛盾的信息,我们探讨了观众对范例的情感反应,以及他们对专家来源和新闻故事主要信息的看法。我们通过向参与者展示两种版本的电视新闻故事——一种是有范例的,另一种是没有范例的。我们通过开放式和封闭式自我报告的结合以及直接通过皮肤电活动来测量参与者的情绪反应,我们通过开放式问题来探索他们对来源和故事信息的感知。我们发现,当观众观看一个榜样的个人账户时,他们会体验到更多的兴奋,并且他们倾向于根据榜样的账户来解释基本利率信息。此外,一些受访者倾向于使与范例的叙述相矛盾的专家来源失去合法性。我们讨论了这些结果对记者的影响,并就记者可以采取哪些措施来应对这种影响提供了初步建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Manufacturing foreign news from afar: Views from an editor’s desk Pressure, compromise and overwork: How Australian regional journalists gain job satisfaction through community service News Values from an Audience Perspective Mediatization(s): Theoretical Conversations between Europe and Latin America, Carlos A. Scolari, José L. Fernández and Joan R. Rodríguez-Amat (Eds) (2021) Assessing adherence to guidelines of media reporting on suicide based on the Precaution Adoption Process Model and Agenda-Setting Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1