Of Binding Provisions and Trust Marks; Roadmap to a Global Legal Framework for the Digital Economy

A. Willems, M. Kamau
{"title":"Of Binding Provisions and Trust Marks; Roadmap to a Global Legal Framework for the Digital Economy","authors":"A. Willems, M. Kamau","doi":"10.54648/leie2019014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The digital economy is dynamic, fast expanding, and truly global. The legal framework that currently applies to the digital economy is either divided, fragmented, ad hoc, out of date, or nonexistent. Some legal initiatives quixotically aim at stopping cross-border data flows, reflecting consumer fears regarding privacy and security or government fears about losing tax revenue. The fragmented regulatory environment does not help companies ‘scale up’ digital technologies; in turn, this hampers innovation and global economic growth. In addition, some less digitally developed actors complain that current rules allow or even foster unfair competition.   This article proposes a new and global legal framework for the digital economy: structured cooperation between states and companies under the administration of an autonomous body. States may resist giving up sovereignty, and citizens may fear erosion of their legal rights. However, uniform, consistent, and enforceable rules would benefit both states and citizens. Tax revenue could be fairly assessed and distributed, for example, and citizens and businesses would no longer face divergent privacy and security rules. Regulation would become more legitimate because both public and private stakeholders would participate in rulemaking, including smaller players and digital latecomers. Companies that subscribe to the framework would receive a global ‘trust mark’ that would boost consumer confidence. In sum, a global legal framework, as contemplated, would match the global character of activities in the digital economy","PeriodicalId":42718,"journal":{"name":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2019014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The digital economy is dynamic, fast expanding, and truly global. The legal framework that currently applies to the digital economy is either divided, fragmented, ad hoc, out of date, or nonexistent. Some legal initiatives quixotically aim at stopping cross-border data flows, reflecting consumer fears regarding privacy and security or government fears about losing tax revenue. The fragmented regulatory environment does not help companies ‘scale up’ digital technologies; in turn, this hampers innovation and global economic growth. In addition, some less digitally developed actors complain that current rules allow or even foster unfair competition.   This article proposes a new and global legal framework for the digital economy: structured cooperation between states and companies under the administration of an autonomous body. States may resist giving up sovereignty, and citizens may fear erosion of their legal rights. However, uniform, consistent, and enforceable rules would benefit both states and citizens. Tax revenue could be fairly assessed and distributed, for example, and citizens and businesses would no longer face divergent privacy and security rules. Regulation would become more legitimate because both public and private stakeholders would participate in rulemaking, including smaller players and digital latecomers. Companies that subscribe to the framework would receive a global ‘trust mark’ that would boost consumer confidence. In sum, a global legal framework, as contemplated, would match the global character of activities in the digital economy
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有约束力的条款与信任标志数字经济全球法律框架路线图
数字经济是动态的、快速发展的、真正全球化的。目前适用于数字经济的法律框架要么是分裂的、碎片化的、临时的、过时的,要么是不存在的。一些法律举措不切实际地旨在阻止跨境数据流动,反映出消费者对隐私和安全的担忧,或政府对税收损失的担忧。分散的监管环境无助于企业“扩大”数字技术的规模;这反过来又阻碍了创新和全球经济增长。此外,一些数字化程度较低的参与者抱怨说,现行规则允许甚至助长了不公平竞争。本文为数字经济提出了一个新的全球法律框架:在一个自治机构的管理下,国家和公司之间的结构化合作。国家可能拒绝放弃主权,公民可能担心他们的合法权利受到侵蚀。然而,统一、一致和可执行的规则将使国家和公民都受益。例如,税收可以公平地评估和分配,公民和企业将不再面临不同的隐私和安全规则。监管将变得更加合法,因为公共和私人利益相关者都将参与规则制定,包括较小的参与者和数字后来者。认购该框架的公司将获得全球“信任标记”,这将提振消费者信心。总而言之,一个全球法律框架,正如所设想的那样,将与数字经济活动的全球特征相匹配
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
The EU’s Anti-coercion Instrument: A Return of Unlawful Unilateral Trade Countermeasures in Disguise? Editorial: Investment Protection in an Integrated Europe – The Non-Enforcement of Intra-EU Investment Arbitration Awards as the Ultimate Test Case for Strasbourg’s Deference Doctrines Why Do (High-Income) Countries Wish to Green Their Trade Agreements? The Application of Regulation 452/2019 in Response to Chinese Foreign Direct Investment The ESM Reform and Its Missing Legitimacy in Non-Euro Area Member States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1