Expecting justice: struggling with the indeterminate between ideals and practices

Heike Drotbohm, Eva Riedke
{"title":"Expecting justice: struggling with the indeterminate between ideals and practices","authors":"Heike Drotbohm, Eva Riedke","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2018.1556441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This commentary contextualizes Jacobs’ study as a contribution to a body of anthropological research concerned with theorizing the state, and more importantly concerned with closing the analytical gap between the study of state images (representations) on the one hand, and practices (everyday experiences of the state) on the other. The commentary sketches three further analytical dimensions that stand in relation thereto: an investigation of historical trajectories of state images and practices; the significant but methodologically difficult move of studying affective registers as constitutive of the political; and an analytical perspective which goes beyond centers of state power and turns to the appearance of state effects in sites not readily seen as belonging to the political.","PeriodicalId":44432,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2018.1556441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This commentary contextualizes Jacobs’ study as a contribution to a body of anthropological research concerned with theorizing the state, and more importantly concerned with closing the analytical gap between the study of state images (representations) on the one hand, and practices (everyday experiences of the state) on the other. The commentary sketches three further analytical dimensions that stand in relation thereto: an investigation of historical trajectories of state images and practices; the significant but methodologically difficult move of studying affective registers as constitutive of the political; and an analytical perspective which goes beyond centers of state power and turns to the appearance of state effects in sites not readily seen as belonging to the political.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
期待正义:在理想与实践的不确定性中挣扎
这篇评论将雅各布斯的研究置于背景中,将其视为对国家理论化的人类学研究的贡献,更重要的是,雅各布斯的研究缩小了国家形象(表征)研究与实践(国家的日常经验)研究之间的分析差距。评论概述了与此相关的三个进一步的分析维度:对国家形象和实践的历史轨迹的调查;将情感语域作为政治语言的组成部分进行研究是一项重要但方法论上困难的举措;这是一种超越国家权力中心的分析视角转向国家在不容易被视为属于政治的地方所产生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: As the pioneering journal in this field The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law (JLP) has a long history of publishing leading scholarship in the area of legal anthropology and legal pluralism and is the only international journal dedicated to the analysis of legal pluralism. It is a refereed scholarly journal with a genuinely global reach, publishing both empirical and theoretical contributions from a variety of disciplines, including (but not restricted to) Anthropology, Legal Studies, Development Studies and interdisciplinary studies. The JLP is devoted to scholarly writing and works that further current debates in the field of legal pluralism and to disseminating new and emerging findings from fieldwork. The Journal welcomes papers that make original contributions to understanding any aspect of legal pluralism and unofficial law, anywhere in the world, both in historic and contemporary contexts. We invite high-quality, original submissions that engage with this purpose.
期刊最新文献
Construing the transformed property paradigm of South Africa’s water law: new opportunities presented by legal pluralism? Wait, what are we fighting about? – Kelsen, Ehrlich and the reconciliation of normative jurisprudence and sociology of law Interview article: water movements’ defense of the right to water. From the European arena to the Dutch exception Scientific versus folk legal pluralism An exploration of legal pluralism, power and custom in South Africa. A conversation with Aninka Claassens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1