V. Tishchenko, V. Petriev, V. Krylov, O. Vlasova, P. Shegai, S. A. Ivanov, A. Kaprin
{"title":"Radiolabeled somatostatin analogs for cancer treatment. Review","authors":"V. Tishchenko, V. Petriev, V. Krylov, O. Vlasova, P. Shegai, S. A. Ivanov, A. Kaprin","doi":"10.21870/0131-3878-2022-31-2-76-96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, a specific action on tumor cells with minimal toxicity to healthy tissues is the main re-quirement for radionuclide therapy of cancer. The molecular target of selective antitumor therapy is determined by somatostatin receptors (SSTR) overexpression in various tumors and its metas-tases. Natural somatostatin cannot be used as a vector molecule for radionuclide delivery due to its short half-life in blood (1-3 min). Synthetic peptide somatostatin analogs labeled with thera-peutic radionuclides (radiopeptides) also have high affinity to SSTR and better pharmacokinetics compared to somatostatin and therefore they are of great interest for targeted cancer therapy, al-so called peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). The data about the most important to date somatostatin analogs labeled with In-111, Y-90, Lu-177 radionuclides for therapy of tumors over-expressing SSTR is presented. The results of treatment efficacy and toxicity profile of PRRT, which is administered with various generations of targeting SSTR radiopharmaceuticals, includ-ing the randomized controlled trial NETTER-1, is reviewed. In addition, some strategies for opti-mization of PRRT such as tandem therapy, intra-arterial administration of radiopharmaceuticals, their modification for better pharmacokinetic properties, and the development of new compounds containing alfa-emitting radionuclides or SSTR antagonist analogs are discussed.","PeriodicalId":6315,"journal":{"name":"\"Radiation and Risk\" Bulletin of the National Radiation and Epidemiological Registry","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"\"Radiation and Risk\" Bulletin of the National Radiation and Epidemiological Registry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21870/0131-3878-2022-31-2-76-96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Currently, a specific action on tumor cells with minimal toxicity to healthy tissues is the main re-quirement for radionuclide therapy of cancer. The molecular target of selective antitumor therapy is determined by somatostatin receptors (SSTR) overexpression in various tumors and its metas-tases. Natural somatostatin cannot be used as a vector molecule for radionuclide delivery due to its short half-life in blood (1-3 min). Synthetic peptide somatostatin analogs labeled with thera-peutic radionuclides (radiopeptides) also have high affinity to SSTR and better pharmacokinetics compared to somatostatin and therefore they are of great interest for targeted cancer therapy, al-so called peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). The data about the most important to date somatostatin analogs labeled with In-111, Y-90, Lu-177 radionuclides for therapy of tumors over-expressing SSTR is presented. The results of treatment efficacy and toxicity profile of PRRT, which is administered with various generations of targeting SSTR radiopharmaceuticals, includ-ing the randomized controlled trial NETTER-1, is reviewed. In addition, some strategies for opti-mization of PRRT such as tandem therapy, intra-arterial administration of radiopharmaceuticals, their modification for better pharmacokinetic properties, and the development of new compounds containing alfa-emitting radionuclides or SSTR antagonist analogs are discussed.