The Use and Plagiarism of Descartes’s Traité de l’homme by Henricus Regius: A Reassessment

Q1 Arts and Humanities Perspectives on Science Pub Date : 2023-04-14 DOI:10.1162/posc_a_00587
Andrea Strazzoni
{"title":"The Use and Plagiarism of Descartes’s Traité de l’homme by Henricus Regius: A Reassessment","authors":"Andrea Strazzoni","doi":"10.1162/posc_a_00587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article I discuss a particular aspect of the Dutch reception of the ideas of René Descartes, namely the use of his Traité de l’homme by Henricus Regius. I analyze the use that Regius made of the theory of the movement of muscles, passions, hunger, and more generally of the neurophysiology expounded by Descartes in his book (not printed until 1662–1664). In my analysis, I reconstruct the internal evolution of Regius’s neurophysiology, I illustrate its sources beyond Descartes (i.e., Jean Fernel and Santorio Santorio), and I show that he was certainly acquainted with some of its contents as early as 1641 (when he used it with the mediation of Descartes), before relying on it—as variously discussed in secondary literature—in his Fundamenta physices (1646), when he appropriated from it without Descartes’s authorization.","PeriodicalId":19867,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Science","volume":"13 1","pages":"627-683"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In this article I discuss a particular aspect of the Dutch reception of the ideas of René Descartes, namely the use of his Traité de l’homme by Henricus Regius. I analyze the use that Regius made of the theory of the movement of muscles, passions, hunger, and more generally of the neurophysiology expounded by Descartes in his book (not printed until 1662–1664). In my analysis, I reconstruct the internal evolution of Regius’s neurophysiology, I illustrate its sources beyond Descartes (i.e., Jean Fernel and Santorio Santorio), and I show that he was certainly acquainted with some of its contents as early as 1641 (when he used it with the mediation of Descartes), before relying on it—as variously discussed in secondary literature—in his Fundamenta physices (1646), when he appropriated from it without Descartes’s authorization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亨利库斯·雷古斯对笛卡儿《人物论》的使用与抄袭:再评
在这篇文章中,我将讨论荷兰人接受笛卡尔思想的一个特殊方面,即亨利库斯·雷古斯(Henricus Regius)对他的《人物论》的使用。我分析了雷吉乌斯对肌肉运动、激情、饥饿理论的运用,以及更广泛地运用了笛卡尔在他的书(1662-1664年才出版)中所阐述的神经生理学。在我的分析中,我重建了雷吉乌斯神经生理学的内部进化,我说明了它的来源超越笛卡尔(即Jean Fernel和Santorio Santorio),我表明他肯定早在1641年就熟悉其中的一些内容(当他在笛卡尔的介导下使用它时),在他的基础物理学(1646)中依赖它之前,在第二手文献中有各种讨论,当他未经笛卡尔授权挪用它时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives on Science
Perspectives on Science Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Emancipation from Metaphysics? Natural History, Natural Philosophy and the Study of Nature from the Late Renaissance to the Enlightenment The Racialization of Killer Whales: An Application of Gene-Culture Coevolutionary Theory Preface: Virtual Entities in Science Conflicting results and statistical malleability: embracing pluralism of empirical results Between mind and body? Psychoneuroimmunology, psychology, and cognitive science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1