CoPSE: A methodological intervention towards gentle more-than-human relations

IF 2.1 2区 社会学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Area Pub Date : 2019-10-06 DOI:10.1111/area.12593
Suzanne Hocknell
{"title":"CoPSE: A methodological intervention towards gentle more-than-human relations","authors":"Suzanne Hocknell","doi":"10.1111/area.12593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>One meaning of ‘gentle’ is consideration for others. However, as Derrida has illustrated, it is impossible for one individual to consider all such others. Here I demonstrate that this impasse arises from the reproduction of self–other binaries. In the case of food, framing eating as consumption co-produces eater and eaten as different kinds of things. Within this framing, even as the eater endeavours to be considerate to eaten others, there are limits to their hospitality. Yet pertinent to this is a second connotation of gentle, that of being easily controlled. Relating and caring with and for others are always negotiated with and in the trajectories we have become implicated in. Recreating otherwise necessitates shifts in the ways in which others are encountered in the here and now. To this end, in this paper I introduce the methodological intervention of ‘CoPSE.’ CoPSE draws on three principles: Collective doings, Playful practices, and prefigurative Strange Encounters, and on Spinoza's concept of the composite individual. Here, I outline how CoPSE was used to gently disrupt situated norms, momentarily making space for embodied investigations of the world-making of self–other relations. I demonstrate that such practices are micro-resistances to social norms that in reproducing self–other binaries co-create hierarchies of care. I argue that through rehearsal, through repetition and difference, such micro-resistances have the chance to become generative micro-refrains that prefigure embodied relations of more-than-human subjectivities and outlive the moment in ways that might just take hold.</p><p>In this essay I introduce the methodological intervention of CoPSE. CoPSE draws on three principles: Collective doings, Playful practices, and prefigurative Strange Encounters, and on Spinoza's concept of the composite individual. Here, I outline how CoPSE was used to gently disrupt situated norms, momentarily making space for embodied investigations of the world-making of self–other relations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8422,"journal":{"name":"Area","volume":"57 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Area","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/area.12593","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One meaning of ‘gentle’ is consideration for others. However, as Derrida has illustrated, it is impossible for one individual to consider all such others. Here I demonstrate that this impasse arises from the reproduction of self–other binaries. In the case of food, framing eating as consumption co-produces eater and eaten as different kinds of things. Within this framing, even as the eater endeavours to be considerate to eaten others, there are limits to their hospitality. Yet pertinent to this is a second connotation of gentle, that of being easily controlled. Relating and caring with and for others are always negotiated with and in the trajectories we have become implicated in. Recreating otherwise necessitates shifts in the ways in which others are encountered in the here and now. To this end, in this paper I introduce the methodological intervention of ‘CoPSE.’ CoPSE draws on three principles: Collective doings, Playful practices, and prefigurative Strange Encounters, and on Spinoza's concept of the composite individual. Here, I outline how CoPSE was used to gently disrupt situated norms, momentarily making space for embodied investigations of the world-making of self–other relations. I demonstrate that such practices are micro-resistances to social norms that in reproducing self–other binaries co-create hierarchies of care. I argue that through rehearsal, through repetition and difference, such micro-resistances have the chance to become generative micro-refrains that prefigure embodied relations of more-than-human subjectivities and outlive the moment in ways that might just take hold.

In this essay I introduce the methodological intervention of CoPSE. CoPSE draws on three principles: Collective doings, Playful practices, and prefigurative Strange Encounters, and on Spinoza's concept of the composite individual. Here, I outline how CoPSE was used to gently disrupt situated norms, momentarily making space for embodied investigations of the world-making of self–other relations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CoPSE:一种对温和的、超越人类的关系的方法论干预
“温柔”的一个含义是为他人着想。然而,正如德里达所说明的,一个人不可能考虑所有这样的其他人。在这里,我证明了这种僵局源于自我-他人二元对立的再现。在食物的例子中,将“吃”定义为“消费”会共同产生“吃”和“吃”这两种不同的东西。在这一框架下,即使食客们努力为他人着想,他们的好客也是有限度的。然而,与此相关的是“温柔”的第二个含义,即容易控制。与他人建立关系、关心他人、关爱他人,总是在我们已经卷入的轨迹中进行协商。否则,重新创造就必须改变他人在此时此地遇到的方式。为此,本文介绍了CoPSE的方法论干预。“CoPSE借鉴了三个原则:集体行为、有趣的实践和预示性的奇怪相遇,以及斯宾诺莎的复合个体概念。”在这里,我概述了CoPSE是如何被用来轻轻地打破现有的规范,暂时为自我与他人关系的世界建构的具体调查创造空间。我证明,这种做法是对社会规范的微观抵制,在复制自我-他人二元对立的过程中,共同创造了护理的等级制度。我认为,通过排练,通过重复和差异,这种微小的抵抗有机会成为生成性的微小克制,预示着超越人类主体性的具体关系,并以可能会根深蒂固的方式超越当下。在本文中,我介绍了CoPSE的方法干预。CoPSE借鉴了三个原则:集体行为、有趣的实践和预示性的奇怪遭遇,以及斯宾诺莎的复合个体概念。在这里,我概述了CoPSE是如何被用来轻轻地打破现有的规范,暂时为自我与他人关系的世界建构的具体调查创造空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Area
Area GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Area publishes ground breaking geographical research and scholarship across the field of geography. Whatever your interests, reading Area is essential to keep up with the latest thinking in geography. At the cutting edge of the discipline, the journal: • is the debating forum for the latest geographical research and ideas • is an outlet for fresh ideas, from both established and new scholars • is accessible to new researchers, including postgraduate students and academics at an early stage in their careers • contains commentaries and debates that focus on topical issues, new research results, methodological theory and practice and academic discussion and debate • provides rapid publication
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Gender and Rewilding: Introduction to the Special Section Rewilding Gender: Towards Relational Understandings of ‘the Wild’ Participatory historical geographies: Introduction Youth-led theatre for climate resilience and action at COP26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1