{"title":"PECS II block: clarifications sought on nomenclature.","authors":"Raghuraman M Sethuraman, Vidhya Narayanan","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2022-103623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21046,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","volume":"103 1","pages":"450"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2022-103623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PECS II块:寻求对命名法的澄清。
我们读了关于各种区域麻醉技术的命名法的文章,发现它非常有用。我们非常感谢专家们的努力,并尊重他们对各种区域麻醉技术命名的建议。我们坚信专家组建议的命名法肯定会避免混淆,并希望对PECS II阻滞(胸肌阻滞II)的命名法进行澄清。据我们所知,“PECS II”是区域麻醉术语中常用的误解术语之一。Blanco等人将PECS II(修改后的PECS I)描述为两种技术的结合,默认包含PECS I。不幸的是,它通常被误解为一种单一的技术,因此一些作者错误地将其描述为“PECS I+PECS II”,正如Woodworth等人在他们关于乳房解剖和局部技术的“发人深省”的评论文章中指出的那样。专家们(尽管只有53%)同意将PECS II命名为“Pectoserratus plane block”。然而,这需要澄清,因为PECS I建议的术语“胸间平面块”尚未添加到PECS II的拟议命名中。我们认为如果在PECS II中建议使用“胸间肌+胸serratus平面阻滞”的统称会更好,以使其更清晰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。