Berater im Spiegel des Feldes. Eine professionssoziologische Rekonstruktion ihrer Legitimierung in Verwaltungen und Universitäten

Tim Seidenschnur, Georg Krücken, Julia Galwa, Rick Vogel
{"title":"Berater im Spiegel des Feldes. Eine professionssoziologische Rekonstruktion ihrer Legitimierung in Verwaltungen und Universitäten","authors":"Tim Seidenschnur, Georg Krücken, Julia Galwa, Rick Vogel","doi":"10.5771/0038-6073-2018-1-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Business consulting has been very successful and has spread into almost every organizational field of society. Today, business consultants are very important for the diffusion of trends in management. However, in organizational fields outside the economic sector, consultants face institutional logics and settings that differ remarkably from economic ones. These logics shape the expectations of clients and thereby determine whether consultants are constructed as legitimate actors in consulting processes or not. This paper analyses how consultants are constructed as legitimate actors by referring to sociological research on professions. Based on that research, the categories knowledge , power , and image are central for our analysis. By making use of these categories, the paper analyses and discusses how consultants are legitimated in universities and public administrations. Empirically, the paper focus-ses on narratives in interviews with clients and consultants in the two fields at hand. The paper contributes to the understanding of how consulting processes are shaped by different institutional settings in which universities and public administrations are embedded. Furthermore, linkages between sociological research on professions and sociology’s new institutionalism are explored.","PeriodicalId":45144,"journal":{"name":"Soziale Welt-Zeitschrift Fur Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung Und Praxis","volume":"63 1","pages":"6-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soziale Welt-Zeitschrift Fur Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung Und Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/0038-6073-2018-1-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

: Business consulting has been very successful and has spread into almost every organizational field of society. Today, business consultants are very important for the diffusion of trends in management. However, in organizational fields outside the economic sector, consultants face institutional logics and settings that differ remarkably from economic ones. These logics shape the expectations of clients and thereby determine whether consultants are constructed as legitimate actors in consulting processes or not. This paper analyses how consultants are constructed as legitimate actors by referring to sociological research on professions. Based on that research, the categories knowledge , power , and image are central for our analysis. By making use of these categories, the paper analyses and discusses how consultants are legitimated in universities and public administrations. Empirically, the paper focus-ses on narratives in interviews with clients and consultants in the two fields at hand. The paper contributes to the understanding of how consulting processes are shaped by different institutional settings in which universities and public administrations are embedded. Furthermore, linkages between sociological research on professions and sociology’s new institutionalism are explored.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
军师在镜子里专业社会理论对其在行政部门和大学的权益构成
当前位置商务咨询非常成功,几乎已经渗透到社会的每一个组织领域。今天,商业顾问对管理趋势的传播非常重要。然而,在经济部门以外的组织领域,顾问面临着与经济部门明显不同的体制逻辑和环境。这些逻辑塑造了客户的期望,从而决定了顾问是否被构建为咨询过程中的合法参与者。本文通过对职业的社会学研究,分析了顾问作为合法行为者是如何被建构的。基于这一研究,知识、权力和形象是我们分析的核心。通过使用这些类别,本文分析和讨论了顾问如何在大学和公共管理中合法化。从经验上看,本文主要关注客户和顾问在这两个领域的访谈中的叙述。本文有助于理解咨询过程是如何被大学和公共管理机构所嵌入的不同制度环境所塑造的。此外,本文还探讨了职业社会学研究与社会学新制度主义之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Soziale Welt is one of the important journals within German sociology and is even read in foreign countries. It includes empirical and theoretical contributions from all areas of the subject and tries to portray the development of sociology and to give a new impetus. In addition to the quarterly published issues, there are special issues with a unified theme. The journal "Soziale Welt" is aimed at sociologists, social scientists, and at generally interested readers
期刊最新文献
Social Origin and Students’ Trajectory Patterns at German Universities. A Sequence-Analytical Approach (K)ein Platz für die Kunst und Kultur ethnischer Minderheiten? Zur Unterstützung der öffentlichen Förderung der Kunst und Kultur ethnischer Minderheiten in der deutschen Bevölkerung Zwischen Kontingenz und Curricula. Bewertungsprozesse in der universitären Lehre Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Homeoffice und suchthaftes Arbeiten in Deutschland. Sind Homeofficeintensität und betriebliche Regulierung von Bedeutung?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1