The role of libraries in promoting knowledge: How to make science truly open?

IF 0.2 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries Pub Date : 2022-10-04 DOI:10.33186/1027-3689-2022-9-15-32
A. E. Rykhtorova
{"title":"The role of libraries in promoting knowledge: How to make science truly open?","authors":"A. E. Rykhtorova","doi":"10.33186/1027-3689-2022-9-15-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"   The modern open science makes an ecosystem comprising open scientific knowledge, science infrastructure, dialogue with other systems of knowledge and engaged social actors. The latter is channelized through the concept of wide social involvement in scientific research – the civil science concept. Despite the libraries are mostly oriented toward the former two components, which is due to their information functions, they are also able to build themselves in the ecosystem through collaboration with civil science project. However, such projects have not become popular, which significantly narrows down the potentialities of open science.   The purpose of the article is to analyze the possibilities for libraries; entering the open science ecosystem through supporting is to open engagement of social players in science.   The author discusses the obstacles on the way of the citizen science as a part open science ecosystem, and libraries involvement. Thus, underdevelopment of civil science in Russia may be partially due to insufficient dissemination of scientific thinking in the non-scientific spheres, the closeness of scientific community and its low interest in communicating with the wider audience. The analysis of 431 websites of Russian research institutes proves that just about 42 % of them popularize scientific activities. Besides, many research institute are not so eager to disseminate instructions for developing the sphere of open and citizen science. Consequently, the libraries cannot jump to the collaboration with citizen science. As the first step, the author suggests to contribute to popularization of science and scientific system and in particular, the open science, and within its context, of the citizen science oriented on the community and researchers.","PeriodicalId":42851,"journal":{"name":"Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2022-9-15-32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

   The modern open science makes an ecosystem comprising open scientific knowledge, science infrastructure, dialogue with other systems of knowledge and engaged social actors. The latter is channelized through the concept of wide social involvement in scientific research – the civil science concept. Despite the libraries are mostly oriented toward the former two components, which is due to their information functions, they are also able to build themselves in the ecosystem through collaboration with civil science project. However, such projects have not become popular, which significantly narrows down the potentialities of open science.   The purpose of the article is to analyze the possibilities for libraries; entering the open science ecosystem through supporting is to open engagement of social players in science.   The author discusses the obstacles on the way of the citizen science as a part open science ecosystem, and libraries involvement. Thus, underdevelopment of civil science in Russia may be partially due to insufficient dissemination of scientific thinking in the non-scientific spheres, the closeness of scientific community and its low interest in communicating with the wider audience. The analysis of 431 websites of Russian research institutes proves that just about 42 % of them popularize scientific activities. Besides, many research institute are not so eager to disseminate instructions for developing the sphere of open and citizen science. Consequently, the libraries cannot jump to the collaboration with citizen science. As the first step, the author suggests to contribute to popularization of science and scientific system and in particular, the open science, and within its context, of the citizen science oriented on the community and researchers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图书馆促进知识的作用:如何使科学真正开放?
现代开放科学构建了一个生态系统,包括开放的科学知识、科学基础设施、与其他知识系统的对话以及参与其中的社会行动者。后者是通过社会广泛参与科学研究的理念——公民科学理念来引导的。尽管图书馆主要面向前两个组成部分,这是由于它们的信息功能,它们也能够通过与民间科学项目的合作在生态系统中建立自己。然而,这样的项目并没有流行起来,这大大缩小了开放科学的潜力。本文的目的是分析图书馆的可能性;通过支持进入开放的科学生态系统是开放的社会参与者参与科学。本文探讨了公民科学作为开放科学生态系统的组成部分,以及图书馆参与的障碍。因此,俄罗斯民间科学发展不足的部分原因可能是科学思想在非科学领域的传播不足,科学界的紧密性以及与更广泛的受众沟通的兴趣不高。通过对俄罗斯431家科研机构网站的分析,发现其中约42%的网站是科普网站。此外,许多研究机构并不急于传播发展开放和公民科学领域的指示。因此,图书馆不能直接与公民科学合作。作为第一步,笔者建议促进科学和科学体系的普及,特别是开放科学,以及在其背景下以社区和研究人员为导向的公民科学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Grouping and categorizing library services at the official websites of central libraries of RF constituent territories: The need for standardized diversification The review of scientific research conducted by libraries: What comes next? Verification of classification modernization solutions (the case study of Library Bibliographic Classification) The virtual reality technologies in the educational processes in Kemerovo State Institute of Culture Special components of society digital transformation to influence technological and behavioral models of modern libraries (Annual report at the Seventh World Professional Forum “SOCHI–2023”)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1