Legitimar psiquiatras antes que curar pacientes. Las terapias de shock en Buenos Aires, Argentina (1930-1970)

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Asclepio-Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia Pub Date : 2017-06-30 DOI:10.3989/ASCLEPIO.2017.08
Aída Alejandra Golcman
{"title":"Legitimar psiquiatras antes que curar pacientes. Las terapias de shock en Buenos Aires, Argentina (1930-1970)","authors":"Aída Alejandra Golcman","doi":"10.3989/ASCLEPIO.2017.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to explain the theoretical and clinical use of shock therapies in Argentine psychiatric field, particularly in the province of Buenos Aires between 1930 and 1970. \nIt is argued that it is necessary to study the theoretical and clinical psychiatric work, in order to learn how psychiatrists interpreted mental pathology. Thus two distinct scenarios are analyzed: first academia, emphasizing on medical texts expressing discussions held at congresses, conferences, university chairs, and secondly in hospital settings, represented by a population of chronic patients in a hospital on the outskirts of the Capital Federal, the Esteves Hospital of Lomas de Zamora. \nThe use of shock therapy in the hands of psychiatrists, changed the way of understanding madness and transformed the daily course of hospitals. Therefore, the presence of such therapies was relevant to legitimize the discipline, regardless of the “effectiveness” with patients.","PeriodicalId":44082,"journal":{"name":"Asclepio-Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asclepio-Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/ASCLEPIO.2017.08","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This research aims to explain the theoretical and clinical use of shock therapies in Argentine psychiatric field, particularly in the province of Buenos Aires between 1930 and 1970. It is argued that it is necessary to study the theoretical and clinical psychiatric work, in order to learn how psychiatrists interpreted mental pathology. Thus two distinct scenarios are analyzed: first academia, emphasizing on medical texts expressing discussions held at congresses, conferences, university chairs, and secondly in hospital settings, represented by a population of chronic patients in a hospital on the outskirts of the Capital Federal, the Esteves Hospital of Lomas de Zamora. The use of shock therapy in the hands of psychiatrists, changed the way of understanding madness and transformed the daily course of hospitals. Therefore, the presence of such therapies was relevant to legitimize the discipline, regardless of the “effectiveness” with patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合法化精神病医生而不是治疗病人。阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯的休克疗法(1930-1970)
本研究旨在解释休克疗法在阿根廷精神病学领域的理论和临床应用,特别是在1930年至1970年之间的布宜诺斯艾利斯省。认为有必要研究精神病学的理论和临床工作,以了解精神科医生如何解释精神病理。因此,分析了两种不同的情况:第一种是学术界,强调医学文本表达在大会、会议、大学主持会议上举行的讨论,第二种是医院环境,以首都联邦郊区医院的慢性病患者为代表,Lomas de Zamora的Esteves医院。精神科医生使用休克疗法,改变了人们对疯狂的理解,也改变了医院的日常治疗。因此,不管对患者的“有效性”如何,这种疗法的存在与该学科的合法性有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
El “darwinismo puro” de Alfred Russel Wallace: aportaciones a la teoría evolutiva moderna Los cuerpos indígenas entre textos y silencios. El caso de una niña Aché De asilo a hospital dos Tifosos: O caso do asilo António Almeida da Costa na primeira metade do século XX. Génese, dinâmicas e funcionalidades Los Médicos irlandeses y las ideas (pre)ilustradas: Raymond Everard (1675-1754) Piezas owenianas en el rompecabezas darwiniano
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1