The Narrative And Collectivity Of The Deradicalization Movement Regarding Terror Actions In Indonesia: A Twitter Analysis

Tawakkal Baharuddin, R. Widayat, Zuly Qodir, H. Jubba
{"title":"The Narrative And Collectivity Of The Deradicalization Movement Regarding Terror Actions In Indonesia: A Twitter Analysis","authors":"Tawakkal Baharuddin, R. Widayat, Zuly Qodir, H. Jubba","doi":"10.14710/jis.1.1.2021.95-110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is based on the events of acts of terrorism and the finding of radicalization efforts in Indonesia. This situation requires a response from many parties, including civil society, that is more participatory in supporting deradicalization efforts. This study aims to analyze the role of social media in influencing the narrative and interest of community collectivities in the deradicalization movement in Indonesia. The method used is quantitative discourse analysis. The data source is social media Twitter, with analysis tools using Nvivo 12 Plus. The study findings explain that Twitter social media can be an alternative in forming participatory, educative, and preventive narratives against deradicalization efforts in Indonesia. The use of social media Twitter can also influence the community's collective interest to get involved in opposing radicalism, whether online or in public space. The results of this research is that deradicalization efforts can also be carried out by utilizing social media, especially by maximizing hashtag and meme features. This finding is an essential argument that deradicalization efforts cannot be carried out with the same approach as shown by radicalism, in that deradicalization is not carried out with arrogance or violence but with a more educative participatory approach. This approach maximizes the potential of social media, which has proven to be more accommodating to reaching the wider community and is more participatory. The substance of this study is seen as a recommendation for maximizing the deradicalization movement in countering radicalism in Indonesia. The limitations of this study are in the research method, which only analyzes specific data sources, so further research is needed that can utilize data sources, especially in exploring data sources from other social media platforms. ","PeriodicalId":32069,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmu Sosial","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmu Sosial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/jis.1.1.2021.95-110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study is based on the events of acts of terrorism and the finding of radicalization efforts in Indonesia. This situation requires a response from many parties, including civil society, that is more participatory in supporting deradicalization efforts. This study aims to analyze the role of social media in influencing the narrative and interest of community collectivities in the deradicalization movement in Indonesia. The method used is quantitative discourse analysis. The data source is social media Twitter, with analysis tools using Nvivo 12 Plus. The study findings explain that Twitter social media can be an alternative in forming participatory, educative, and preventive narratives against deradicalization efforts in Indonesia. The use of social media Twitter can also influence the community's collective interest to get involved in opposing radicalism, whether online or in public space. The results of this research is that deradicalization efforts can also be carried out by utilizing social media, especially by maximizing hashtag and meme features. This finding is an essential argument that deradicalization efforts cannot be carried out with the same approach as shown by radicalism, in that deradicalization is not carried out with arrogance or violence but with a more educative participatory approach. This approach maximizes the potential of social media, which has proven to be more accommodating to reaching the wider community and is more participatory. The substance of this study is seen as a recommendation for maximizing the deradicalization movement in countering radicalism in Indonesia. The limitations of this study are in the research method, which only analyzes specific data sources, so further research is needed that can utilize data sources, especially in exploring data sources from other social media platforms. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于印尼恐怖行动的去极端化运动的叙事和集体性:推特分析
这项研究是基于恐怖主义行为的事件和印度尼西亚激进化努力的发现。这种情况需要包括民间社会在内的许多各方作出反应,更多地参与支持去极端化的努力。本研究旨在分析社交媒体在影响印度尼西亚去极端化运动中社区集体的叙事和利益方面的作用。使用的方法是定量语篇分析。数据来源是社交媒体Twitter,分析工具使用Nvivo 12 Plus。研究结果解释说,Twitter社交媒体可以成为印度尼西亚形成参与性、教育性和预防性叙事的另一种选择,以反对去激进化的努力。使用社交媒体Twitter也可以影响社区的集体利益,参与反对激进主义,无论是在网上还是在公共空间。本研究的结果是,去极端化的努力也可以通过利用社交媒体来进行,特别是通过最大化hashtag和meme的特征。这一发现是一个重要的论点,即去极端化的努力不能用激进主义所显示的相同方法进行,因为去极端化不是用傲慢或暴力进行的,而是用更具教育意义的参与方法进行的。这种方法最大限度地发挥了社交媒体的潜力,事实证明,社交媒体更容易接触到更广泛的社区,也更具参与性。这项研究的实质内容被视为在印度尼西亚最大限度地打击激进主义的去极端化运动的建议。本研究的局限性在于研究方法上,只分析了具体的数据源,需要进一步的研究来利用数据源,特别是挖掘其他社交媒体平台的数据源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Space Race Between China and India to Win Hegemony The Domestic Politics and Indonesia’s Tension with Malaysia on The Ambalat Case The Emerging Workcation Trend in Indonesia: A Preliminary Study on the Demographic Profiles, Motivations, and Experiences of Workcationers Infrastructure Development and Conflict: A Conflict Resolution in The Construction of An Oil Refinery Closing The Digital Gender Gap In Indonesia Through The Roles And Initiatives Of Civil Society Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1