Blending Online Homework and Large Class Tutorials to Provide Learning Support for Introductory Organic Chemistry

L. Pilcher, M. Potgieter, L. Fletcher
{"title":"Blending Online Homework and Large Class Tutorials to Provide Learning Support for Introductory Organic Chemistry","authors":"L. Pilcher, M. Potgieter, L. Fletcher","doi":"10.1080/18117295.2022.2155771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The logistics and cost of running large class tutorials to improve learning for students in high enrolment courses raise questions about whether the associated effort and cost are worthwhile. The option to replace these class activities with online homework with its promise of built-in feedback is attractive. Using an activity theory lens and an experimental design, we compared the impact of class tutorials with online homework to support learning offered in face-to-face lectures on student performance. We found that there were no topics in the introductory organic chemistry syllabus in which students who had completed online homework instead of large class tutorials performed better. In contrast, for all topics except ‘Curved arrows in mechanisms’, the mean performance of students who had attended a large class tutorial was statistically significantly better than for those who completed online homework instead. This large quantitative study with a sample of 667 students demonstrated the advantage conferred by face-to-face tutorials with peer learning and personal feedback even in a large class setting with only three sessions per student. Our recommendation is that an online homework system in blended courses should not replace face-to-face tutorials for topics reliant on personalised instruction and feedback. We advocate for investing resources and effort to provide face-to-face problem-solving sessions in high-enrolment introductory organic chemistry courses to improve performance.","PeriodicalId":44353,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science and Technology Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science and Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2022.2155771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The logistics and cost of running large class tutorials to improve learning for students in high enrolment courses raise questions about whether the associated effort and cost are worthwhile. The option to replace these class activities with online homework with its promise of built-in feedback is attractive. Using an activity theory lens and an experimental design, we compared the impact of class tutorials with online homework to support learning offered in face-to-face lectures on student performance. We found that there were no topics in the introductory organic chemistry syllabus in which students who had completed online homework instead of large class tutorials performed better. In contrast, for all topics except ‘Curved arrows in mechanisms’, the mean performance of students who had attended a large class tutorial was statistically significantly better than for those who completed online homework instead. This large quantitative study with a sample of 667 students demonstrated the advantage conferred by face-to-face tutorials with peer learning and personal feedback even in a large class setting with only three sessions per student. Our recommendation is that an online homework system in blended courses should not replace face-to-face tutorials for topics reliant on personalised instruction and feedback. We advocate for investing resources and effort to provide face-to-face problem-solving sessions in high-enrolment introductory organic chemistry courses to improve performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合在线作业和大班教程,为入门有机化学提供学习支持
为提高高入学率课程学生的学习水平而开设大班辅导课的后勤和成本引发了一个问题:相关的努力和成本是否值得?用在线作业取代这些课堂活动的选择很有吸引力,因为它承诺内置反馈。运用活动理论和实验设计,我们比较了课堂辅导和在线作业对学生表现的影响,以支持面对面讲座提供的学习。我们发现,在有机化学入门课程的教学大纲中,没有哪一个主题能让完成在线作业的学生比完成大班辅导的学生表现得更好。相比之下,除了“机械中的弯曲箭头”之外,在所有主题中,参加大班辅导的学生的平均表现在统计上明显好于那些完成在线作业的学生。这项以667名学生为样本的大型定量研究表明,即使在每个学生只有三节课的大班环境中,面对面辅导与同伴学习和个人反馈所带来的优势。我们的建议是,混合式课程的在线作业系统不应取代依赖个性化指导和反馈的面对面课程。我们提倡投入资源和精力,在高入学率的有机化学入门课程中提供面对面解决问题的课程,以提高成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The editorial policy of'' the African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (AJRMSTE) is to disseminate, as widely as possible, high quality research findings and well written articles on Curriculum Studies; Teacher Education; Education for Development; Mathematics Education; Science Education; Design & Technology Education and Computer Education. Articles that promote the understanding of curricular policy and diverse socio-cultural issues and those which stimulate epistemological and methodological debates are welcome. The editorial board welcomes articles that will contribute to the overall development of science, mathematics, technology and environmental education in Africa.
期刊最新文献
Decolonising Technology Education: Integrating Indigenous Knowledge for Sustainable Development in Electrical and Mechanical Systems and Control Teachers’ Perceptions of and Suggestions for Embedding Entrepreneurship in Technology Education Ethnomathematics in Intermediate Phase: Reflections on the Morabaraba Game as Indigenous Mathematical knowledge Secondary School Life Sciences Teachers’ Understanding of Indigenous Knowledge in Relation to their Views on its Integration into their Classroom Practice Teachers’ Experiences with the Use of Virtual Laboratories in the Teaching of Physics in Rwandan Secondary Schools: A Survey Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1